I dont know where you get your numbers...Israel don't want Palestinians....they want hamas....you sound racist if uou think all Palestinians ate hamas / terrorists.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST
- Thread starter niniveh
- Start date
Historical revisionism.
Israel started it by being sneak attacked by Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon and Syria?
I don't think you've told frank that? How come? He's called for a ceasefire thousands of times.
Because a ceasefire is the first step towards ending apartheid and the occupation, shack.
You need to start somewhere.
They did not tell Israel to stop. Their rulings are clearly written and need no interpretation. You have no legal background but claim to know how to write rulings better. Your incoherent ramblings are less than worthless.
By your Bizarro logic, this means you've committed hate speech.
Mod99
Moderator
Feb 19, 202121
Hate speech will not be tolerated.
Last edited:
Wrong again, shack.
The court ordered Israel must prevent 'killing members of the group'.
That means no more killing Palestinians.
Ceasefire is the only way to do that.
The Court indicates provisional measures
In its Order, which has binding effect, the Court indicates the following provisional measures:
“(1) By fifteen votes to two,
The State of Israel shall, in accordance with its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, in relation to Palestinians in Gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II of this Convention, in particular:
(a) killing members of the group;
(b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and
Keep lying as much as you want. The ICJ's ruling is in black and white. No interpretation required.
I predicted that you'd lie. You have no options when you've been overmatched. You do the same thing over and over when you lose. Which is a lot.
...Hamas breaking another one.
Ceasefires are fragile and temporary. A surrender is much less so. And faster.
So you're saying that the ICJ are dummies who do not know how write to write rulings.
Who's the real dummy?
With comments like that, you are conceding that you've been lying.
More of the reckoning
www.theguardian.com
CNN staff say network’s pro-Israel slant amounts to ‘journalistic malpractice’
Insiders say pressure from the top results in credulous reporting of Israeli claims and silencing of Palestinian perspectives
www.theguardian.com
Yes, Israel and its military are ordered to 'prevent' killing Palestinians in Gaza.
End of story.
The Court indicates provisional measures
In its Order, which has binding effect, the Court indicates the following provisional measures:
“(1) By fifteen votes to two,
The State of Israel shall, in accordance with its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, in relation to Palestinians in Gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II of this Convention, in particular:
(a) killing members of the group;
(b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and
What bunch of racist shit, showing you consider the Palestinians so far beneath you that the government of Gaza can't be criticized even though they're the one who launched this war.
Unlike you, I don't take the posts of random people as having much significance.
It would be black and white is if they actually said what you pretend they said. Alas, such is not the case and you are simply bullshitting. There WAS NOTHING THAT THEY EXPLICITLY TOLD ISRAEL TO STOP. You cannot find anything remotely close to that. Your laughable interpretations mean squat, They are Orwellian double speak.
Very different than not killing Hamas and very different than not being able to avoid Gazan citizens being used as human shields. Those are war crimes that lie at the hands of Hamas.
Said group refers to non-combatant civilians. That excludes Hamas.
Said group refers to non-combatant civilians. That excludes Hamas.
Said group refers to non-combatant civilians. That excludes Hamas.
They have as much significance as random posts from you.
This is what you are backing.
No, the order says Israel must prevent killing 'Palestinians in Gaza', regardless of whether you think they are in Hamas or not.
The Court indicates provisional measures
In its Order, which has binding effect, the Court indicates the following provisional measures:
“(1) By fifteen votes to two,
The State of Israel shall, in accordance with its obligations under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, in relation to Palestinians in Gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II of this Convention, in particular:
(a) killing members of the group;
(b) causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; and
How idiotic.
I keep posting the text and a link to the text and you keep refusing to read it.
That makes you sound like a moron, a fool, some blowhard who thinks he knows the law but won't ever read it.
