INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,290
6,133
113

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,884
10,262
113
Toronto
If genocide in fact happen, ICJ would simply state "genocide has occured" i have not seen them state that....that would be straight to the point and clear "even a 5 year old" would understand....
That doesn't work for somebody who is attempting to gaslight.

He reminds me of the doublespeak in "1984".

Big Brother says:
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

Cutya' says:
Not Saying Stop Means Stop

It's moronic. Does he think everybody is stupid. Does anybody but fringie agree with him?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: richaceg

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,884
10,262
113
Toronto
They did. They said stop incitement, prevent genocide and stop the army from committing said genocide. There is no reason to say that to a country that wasnt inciting and committing genocide. They would have just said they were innocent if that was the case. But they didnt. They didnt because Israel is guilty. Guess for being a professor of logic your comprehension skills are still grade 1. Or maybe you just fudged your credentials.
You got owned everytime. You've been totally unable to show any flaws in my line of thought. Instead of that all you have is insults, lies, gaslighting and doublespeak. (See above)

Ignorance is Strength (LOL. Are you trying to show us how strong you are?)
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery

And now we have:
Not Saying Stop Means Stop

Nobody is buying your idiocy.

What's next?:
ICJ says return the hostages means keep the hostages.

BTW, did you notice how direct they were with that order? "Return the hostages." ZERO interpretation required. According to you, they would have said "prevent the hostages from not being returned". And according to you that would be interpreted as the remaining 130 hostages Hamas has have already been returned.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,884
10,262
113
Toronto
Its not blood, those are scars from phosphorus burns.
From Israel's use in 2021
Hahahaha.

How do you KNOW that they're from 2021? Do you even know who she is? If you know her medical history, what's her name? You're lying.
Those "scars" are still bright blood-red after 3 years. Every kid you show has bright red phosphorus "scars". LOL
Some of the kids are under 3 years old. They weren't even alive in 2021.

You are just a desperate bullshitter who is losing at everything.

Losing on the battlefield.
Losing in the courts.
Losing in the halls of power.
At least you're not losing your credibility. You completely lost it a long time ago.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,884
10,262
113
Toronto
And if genocide did not happen, they would have unequivocally acquitted Israel. dumb.
Dumb is right. You and frank have told us that the session the other Friday was not intended to render a guilty or innocent verdict.

More gaslighting.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,884
10,262
113
Toronto
On the other hand, I have repeatedly shown you that your arguments lack thought. You have pwned yourself, by resorting to childish logic, and "hanging on by a thread". In each case, your arguments were turned back on you, further causing you to pretzel yourself, earning yourself various debious titles such as Mr. Apartheid, White supremacist, "Professor of Logic" and most recently Dr. Apartheid 😂 . I wouldn't consider these "wins" but for someone who relies on thoughtlessness and childishness in arguments, I guess it is par for the course.

PS: The hostages are not important. Israel does not care about them either. That is why they shot 3 of them when they came out with their hands up, in their underwear. The Israelis know this too, and that is why they stormed the parliament the other day.

Palestinian civilians > Israeli hostages.
Palestinian civilians > Hamas
Palestinian civilians > Israel's military objectives.

Imagine that. If the court did not convene to render a guilty or innocent verdict, and YET ruled that Israel needs to stop incitement and genocidal actions. It couldn't be clearer that Israel is guilty of genocide. Incitement + action = genocide. By the way it is only gas lighting because you are full of hot air. Not facts. 😂

You can stop talking about it if you'd like. But for people who actually know a thing or two about this conflict, it is irrefutably acknowledged, that the 75 year occupation and the resulting conflict, IS the actual issue.
It would take me about 10 pages to address all the BS, lies and gaslighting. This is like an anti-Semitic manifesto. Pure hate speech.

The hostages are not important.
Because the ICJ ordered the hostages to be returned and you, just like frank, have no response. It's your classic "that's irrelevant" when you're cornered like a rat.

Nobody needs to read anything else from you and they know 100% that you hate ALL Jews and would love to see another Holocaust.

You are sick.
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,775
22,864
113
You're read the ruling and yet you interpret it far from what it was....you can spin it however you want...it will only mean one thing...
Yes, it will mean you are afraid to look at the ruling, will never read it and will still declare yourself more knowledgable.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,775
22,864
113
You got owned everytime. You've been totally unable to show any flaws in my line of thought. Instead of that all you have is insults, lies, gaslighting and doublespeak. (See above)

Ignorance is Strength (LOL. Are you trying to show us how strong you are?)
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery

And now we have:
Not Saying Stop Means Stop

Nobody is buying your idiocy.

What's next?:
ICJ says return the hostages means keep the hostages.

BTW, did you notice how direct they were with that order? "Return the hostages." ZERO interpretation required. According to you, they would have said "prevent the hostages from not being returned". And according to you that would be interpreted as the remaining 130 hostages Hamas has have already been returned.
And yet you are afraid to read the report and can't rebut the direct quotes.
Instead you act like rich and claim you are right without reading or understanding the ruling.
But that's all that's left when you back genocide, you are too afraid of reality now.
You deny everything, reports, ICJ rulings, polls, photos and videos.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,860
6,827
113
It is incredibly racist to ...
You have already said you think Hamas is too low to criticize. Thanks.
And you obviously think ICJ rulings shouldn't have to apply to them. Sorry but hamas is the only group unambiguously violating the ICJ right now.




Just as racist as your pretence that Canada's Indigenous are happy with their state in life.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,860
6,827
113
It is pure hate speech to support Zionist genocide of the Palestinians. Case closed.

I am not saying the hostages are not relevant....
Hmm

...

PS: The hostages are not important...
Just like when you demanded Jews "go back" to where the came from because you think Israel is colonial while you chose to come here to a clearly colonial enterprise.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,775
22,864
113
Just like when you demanded Jews "go back" to where the came from because you think Israel is colonial while you chose to come here to a clearly colonial enterprise.
Is that like where you demanded that zionists get to keep any land they stole?

There should be a negotiated two state peace but there is no giving "back" land.
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts