Context?Can you provide context?
I think it's reasonable to remove an "aid NGO" that funnels money to a major terrorist group and facilitates its control of a power base of over 2M people.
And this idea that Palestinians are still "refugees" when their grandparents were forced out of their homes 75 years ago is dumb and simply gets in the way of finding a way forward.
Will you honestly read and discuss the context?
1) Israel has a history of trying to label NGO's as 'terrorist', for instance they labelled Defence For Children International 'terrorists' along with 7 other NGO's. The UN had to have them revoke this but it took months for them to do a proper investigation.
2) Israel has a long history of trying to attack the UNRWA based on the UNRWA being the repository for the documentation for 5 million Palestinian refugees outside of Israel, including supporting them with aid and documenting their claims.
3) The UNRWA is an agency of the UN that was created out of pressure from the US and Israel to separated dealing with Palestinian refugees.
4) Israel's accusations against the UNRWA have changed from 12 people to 4 people who took part in Oct 7.
5) The 'evidence' has not been shared but appears to come from Hamas captured on Oct 7 and likely tortured.
6) There is no other agency that has the infrastructure and workers to support feeding and sheltering the 2 million homeless Palestinians starving in Gaza right now.
Feel free to read the Israeli paper Haaretz's take.
And compare that to Al Jazeera's.
What is UNRWA and why is it important for Palestinians?
The UN agency, which supports 6 million Palestinian refugees, is the main aid provider in Gaza amid Israeli bombardment.
www.aljazeera.com