Garden of Eden Escorts

E Jean Carroll woman of the year!

Previous Thread Next Thread
mandrill

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,027
90,511
113
mitchell76 said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1752429824474304559
Click to expand...
That would be denied and likely cost Habba her law licence.

Members of the Bar have personal contact all the time. They meet at Bench and Bar social events. They attend educationals together. They sometimes work at the same law firms or act as co counsel at the same trial. It takes a significant personal association to raise any presumption of impropriety.

Being in the same 1,000 partner NYC law firm 30 years ago isn't close to cutting it. The motion will be perceived as malpractice and unethical and an unwarranted personal attack on the judge.

Habba is probably on professional thin ice already. She was massively sanctioned for $900k in another Trump debacle. She clowned her way through both the Engoron and Kaplan trials, making numerous mistakes and running her mouth like a 2-bit punk during recess.

The next fuck-up she creates will likely be her last.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer and mitchell76
K

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,584
8,277
113
Room 112
toguy5252 said:
I say this respectfully and the appellate court may agree with you but you do not understand legal procedure. The defence wanted to relitigate the issue about eherth he has assaulted her. That issue had already been decided and this was just an assessment of damages. His remedy if he didn’t like the previous decision was to appeal which I believe he has. But it is not open to any litigant to relitigate the issue of liability in an assessment trial. Her statements are just legally wrong and she is playing to him and his base. If she is right the appellate court will set it aside. Time will tell. I do think they will reduce the award.
Click to expand...
This was actually damages in relation to Trump defending himself in 2019 from the allegations she went public with. Defending your name is now punishable by tens of millions of dollars in damages. What a farce.
The civil trial back in the spring concluded that Trump was liable for sexual abuse and not the rape that she claimed. That judgement is currently under appeal. And will likely be overturned.
This woman is an utter disgrace. You see her on the talk shows gloating. Sure sounds like a victim of rape to me :rolleyes:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar, squeezer and mitchell76
mandrill

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,027
90,511
113
K Douglas said:
This was actually damages in relation to Trump defending himself in 2019 from the allegations she went public with. Defending your name is now punishable by tens of millions of dollars in damages. What a farce.
The civil trial back in the spring concluded that Trump was liable for sexual abuse and not the rape that she claimed. That judgement is currently under appeal. And will likely be overturned.
This woman is an utter disgrace. You see her on the talk shows gloating. Sure sounds like a victim of rape to me :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Guess the jury didn't agree with you, huh?... Either time.

That's the crazy thing about our justice system. We go with what the jury says, not with what randos say. Strange, huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar and squeezer
K

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,163
7,278
113
Again, djt had an attorney. They were allowed to dismiss biased jurors. He was able to put on a defence. He lost. Thus his inability to put on a defense thats being passed around is just not true. He did. He lost. He wants to put on a defense during the penalty phase. Not allowed, except relevant to the damages, not the factual finding. But he won't do that under oath because he'd rather flood the zone with shit not under oath.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar, squeezer and mandrill
T

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
K Douglas said:
This was actually damages in relation to Trump defending himself in 2019 from the allegations she went public with. Defending your name is now punishable by tens of millions of dollars in damages. What a farce.
The civil trial back in the spring concluded that Trump was liable for sexual abuse and not the rape that she claimed. That judgement is currently under appeal. And will likely be overturned.
This woman is an utter disgrace. You see her on the talk shows gloating. Sure sounds like a victim of rape to me :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
There is no problem defending one’s name as long as you do it without defaming someone else. You are just repeating the narrative the former sexual abuser in chief would like you to believe which of course has nothing to do with the facts or the law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar, squeezer and mandrill
mandrill

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,027
90,511
113
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer and mitchell76
T

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
mitchell76 said:
No, it's the dumbest and most bias law ever created, with the sole purpose to "get Trump." Without the creation of this "dumb" law, E Jean wouldn't have had a case-----LOL
Click to expand...
your real complaint is that he should not be subject to the laws that mere mortals are.
 
T

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
mitchell76 said:
No, it's the dumbest and most bias law ever created, with the sole purpose to "get Trump." Without the creation of this "dumb" law, E Jean wouldn't have had a case-----LOL
Click to expand...
That’s the thing about laws. Sometimes you like them sometimes you don’t but laws apply to everyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill
mandrill

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,027
90,511
113
mitchell76 said:
Nope, my complaint is the statute of limitations part of this new law.
Click to expand...
But the law could also have been used against Joe Biden, right?

Except Joe Biden didn't rape anyone and then lie about her.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer
You must log in or register to reply here.
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom