As will not finding Israel guilty. Finding Israel guilty would be the best thing that happened to Israel. Without it, the payback is going to be horrendous.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST
- Thread starter niniveh
- Start date
While there may be a little more merit to that. If you don’t like the western world and want it to fail…unlike most ME nations that treat many of its citizens as little more than chattel…and maybe that partly explains why the west…
it’s a free world…
They absolutely did not make a specific designation as such. Show me where the phrase "Israel must stop the genocide" or "we have determined that Israel has committed genocide" appears in their statement.
There is plausibility that you are a raving anti-Semite and want the Jews ethnically cleansed from Israel.
They were told to not commit any acts that contravene the Genocide Convention.
We know you don't believe there is genocide going on but the entire world does and sees this as Israel must stop committing genocide.
Read the ruling and tell me where it says Israel can keep doing what its doing exactly the same way.
Read the I.C.J. ruling
The International Court of Justice issued a preliminary ruling in a case accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza.
Israel was told to not destroy any evidence of genocide for trial, report in 30 days on what they've changed and arrest those who incite genocide.
They were also told to allow all aid in and instead Israel worked to block funding for the UNRWA.
Israel will go to trial for genocide.
congrats
zionism = genocide and will forever be remembered as fondly as nazis.
To quote your KKK buddies when they attempt to justify Oct. 7, they like to say "things happen for a reason" or "things don't happen in a vacuum".
Well, there's a reason that these countries were pouring in millions and millions in aid, but have now suddenly stopped. It didn't happen in a vacuum and it had nothing to do with supporting genocide, otherwise they'd have pulled funding long ago. UNWRA fucked themselves by reneging on their mandate.
Correct. It is a clear statement. But you cannot extrapolate that to mean anything else.
It is truly fascinating what will happen. Clearly, the case for genocide is getting stronger, as Israel if anything is stepping up ethnic cleansing, and the pause of funding for UNWRA is strengthening the famine and health problems in Gaza.
I think it may be the end of UN as we know it. A genocide verdict will be ignored by the west, and UN will be meaningless. A no genocide verdict will make UN meaningless.
There will be big consequences.
Israel has been trying to kill the UNRWA for years.
They want to accelerate the genocide.
The ICJ ruled that South Africa's case that Israel is committing genocide to be 'plausible' and ordered Israel to stop genocide, provide aid, save all evidence for trial and report back in a month.
Israel could have stopped the genocide and likely stopped the ICJ genocide trial.
Instead they upped it.
Instead they upped it.
They do not give cryptic rulings that need to be interpreted. If they felt there was genocide they'd have clearly said so. But they didn't. You're farting in the wind
No they haven't.
It just shows Israel is still torturing Palestinians and trying to commit more genocide.
Five Palestinians arrested by Israeli forces in Jenin allege torture
Five Palestinians arrested by the Israeli military during a raid on the city of Jenin in the occupied West Bank on Monday say that they were tortured in custody, Wafa reports.
The men were taken to an Israeli settlement called Mabu Dothan south of Jenin, where they say soldiers handcuffed, blindfolded and beat them over the course of 10 hours. Israeli soldiers also submerged them in cold water, the men said.
The men were transferred to the Ibn Sina Hospital in Jenin on their release.
Why did the ICJ order Israel to save all evidence of possible genocide?
Why did the ICJ order Israel to report back in 30 days if there was no genocide?
Ethnic cleansing and genocide has always been Israel's goal.
Maybe, as someone recently pointed, you have problems with English as your second language.
They told Israel not to engage in certain activities. They did NOT tell Israel to STOP said activities.
Or maybe your English is fine. You just prefer lying instead.
Well, whatever class this is, you're getting a failing grade. "Do not engage in genocidal activities" is a prohibition, not a condemnation. You might have to crack open a dictionary for these terms.
None of which changes the fact they DID NOT state that Israel has committed genocide.
All you have are your biased interpretations of what you think is a cryptic message from ICJ. If true, they would have unequivocally said "Israel has committed genocide." No interpretations or analysis would be required.
Keep looking, but it's nowhere to be found in their ruling.
