Rosewall won at 37.The original "Big 3" plus Murray are all north of 30, 35, etc.
I did a survey once and I think the oldest to win a major were Sampas and Ashe at age 31. Not sure about Agassi.
Jimmy Connors | 1983 | US Open | 31y 0m 9d | |
174 | Pete Sampras | 2002 | US Open | 31y 0m 27d |
175 | Rod Laver | 1969 | US Open | 31y 1m 0d |
176 | Arthur Ashe | 1975 | Wimbledon | 31y 11m 25d |
177 | Andre Agassi | 2003 | Australian | 32y 8m 28d |
178 | Ken Rosewall | 1968 | Roland Garros | 33y 7m 7d |
179 | Andres Gimeno | 1972 | Roland Garros | 34y 10m 1d |
180 | Ken Rosewall | 1970 | US Open | 35y 10m 11d |
181 | Ken Rosewall | 1971 | Australian | 36y 2m 12d |
182 | Ken Rosewall | 1972 | Australian | 37y 2m 1d |
Wrong! Medvedev was up 2 sets on Nadal at the AO final exactly 2 years ago and then Rafa came back to beat him. Exactly what Sinner just did today. LOLA stupefying match, Medvedez has never lost when he's he's up two sets.
60 times is hardly very rare.It is still true that winning a major after age 31 is very rare.
Telling us that younger tennis players/athletes have better results than older ones is hardly a revelation. It's like, D'UH, you're not telling us something that all of us didn't already know. It happens in every sport. Picking an arbitrary age as some kind artificial cut off means nothing. What does it prove? What are we learning? Because there are always exceptions.If 60 is not rare after age 31 than how many did they win before turning 31? Did they win any after age 31?
Novak Djokovic is now 36. How many more (if any) majors in his future? Age, wear and tear. Younger opponents. He may very well never win another Slam.
If history is any guide, age 31 seems to be the cut-off. At least it was for Connors, Ashe, Sampas, Agassi (32), Borg retired at 26.