INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE: LATEST

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113
They are following the process and S. Africa's arguments look like got put through a food processor.
You really are delusional.

However, you are right in that USA, UK and Canada will shield Israel from any consequences of its actions.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,111
113
Toronto
The court went as far as they could in ruling against the US and Israel.....
...considering S. Africa's case was torn to shreds. BTW, was the US actually mentioned in the ruling or are you spreading more lies? Was the US mentioned in the complaint?

They found evidence that Israel is committing genocide
They did not and would have clearly said so if that was the case.

and the trial will happen,
In a mere 3-7 years. LOL

in the meantime they ordered Israel to stop committing genocide.
Another big fat lie.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,261
113
...considering S. Africa's case was torn to shreds. BTW, was the US actually mentioned in the ruling or are you spreading more lies? Was the US mentioned in the complaint?
'torn to shreds'?
They found the case that Israel is committing genocide right now plausible and ordered Israel to cease anything that looks like genocide, arrest those who are inciting genocide and report back in a month on how they've stopped the genocide.

 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,483
4,902
113

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,111
113
Toronto
Are you trying to argue that a 16-2 vote was a win for Israel?
Another lie. The post said that the only 2 judges who actually experienced genocide said that there was no genocide here.

15 of 17 agreed with only imposing a couple of mean-nothing and toothless provisional measures. Yes, Israel won big time.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,111
113
Toronto
The ICJ are a bunch of mincing cowards more interested in lining their pockets than meting out justice.

The tragedy is the Knesset is being controlled by religious fanatics who want the return of Old Testament Judea. The clown Netanyahu is being led by the ear by them, he does what he's told. The Oct 7th attack was not random, the Orthodox settlers were on a campaign to split The West Bank...they were going full Book of Joshua on the West Bank Palestinians. Hamas had to act or be branded as yellow-bellies by the greater Palestinian community. Unfortunately they put their rectums in their mouths by taking hostages, breaking the Geneva Convention.
Is this a review of an Al-Jazeera produced movie. Who directed it and how many stars did it get? Can you post the trailer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leimonis

Klatuu

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2022
5,742
3,357
113
A total misrepresentation of what they said.

They said that certain things were getting close but no real evidence of actual genocide...even by their standards. And since they clearly ruled that there has been no genocide, it would be ludicrous to say that are ordering a stop to something that they say does not exist. All they are saying to Israel, is to be careful as to how they proceed. Basically, they said "You haven't committed genocide, so feel free to keep doing what you've been doing. Go get those Hamas vermin."

A far cry from what you were predictlng. ICJ. ICJ. You just wait. You were the only one making bold predictions and everybody else was saying "we'll see". Now you are the only one that looks like a complete fool. You can use your Palestinian flag to wipe the tears pouring down your face. Are you going to the Hague to protest? Hahahahaha.

Like I said, nobody takes you seriously and this is why.
Delusional
 
  • Like
Reactions: danmand

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,261
113
Another lie. The post said that the only 2 judges who actually experienced genocide said that there was no genocide here.

15 of 17 agreed with only imposing a couple of mean-nothing and toothless provisional measures. Yes, Israel won big time.
The ICJ thinks Israel is committing genocide and they told them to cut it out and report back in a month.
You think that's a win for Israel?

 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,111
113
Toronto
You are getting more and more pathetic, little fat boy.
A loser needs to resort to insults.

Posting on Terb will not help you get a gig defending Canada when charges are brought to the ICJ for complicity in genocide.
How many years is that going to take? LOL.

It sounds exactly like frank. "Wait till Friday. Wait till Friday." Well, we waited and I guess the saying that "good things are worth waiting for" was correct. Keep waiting while Israel finishes the job of eradicating Hamas with the ICJ/UN blessing.

Go eat some herring in the meantime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,111
113
Toronto
As many observers say the directives cannot be met without a ceasefire.
A unilateral Hamas surrender would be even faster. There you go. No negotiations needed and more Gazan lives saved. Who could possibly be opposed to that?
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,719
10,111
113
Toronto
Funny how all the people are claiming victory for Israel...except Netanboohoo is OUTRAGED!!! lol
That's for public display. He's gotta be happy. It actually helps the IJC in saying that they were even-handed. Neither side is satisfied.

He did the IJC a solid. Well-played.
 

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,555
2,458
113
Let me explain this to you like I would to a 5 year old.

If someone tells you - "Don't do XYZ". It means they think you currently do XYZ.

Using that theorem, because the ICJ told Israel - "Don't do genocide and don't incite genocide" - it consequently means, that they acknowledge that Israel is currently engaged in genocide and incitement of genocide.
Don’t murder or rape someone.
does that mean you are murdering and raping people?

Don’t discriminate. Good to know I can think you’re a racist
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar

Not getting younger

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2022
4,555
2,458
113
If it comes from a court of law after examining evidence, then sure.
what does the law tell you? See above plus a whole lot more.

“f someone tells you - "Don't do XYZ". It means they think you currently do XYZ.”

Given the present situation we can take it as a mild rebuke. That said…
“Barn doors”?
 

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
9,697
9,437
113
what does the law tell you? See above plus a whole lot more.

“f someone tells you - "Don't do XYZ". It means they think you currently do XYZ.”
our team hamas is losing it lol
1706381128026.png
 
Toronto Escorts