There's nothing racist about what I said. It's security analysis.
Israel gave Gaza to the Palis.
They 'gave' them a tiny part of what is supposed to be Palestine, where 75% of the population are stateless refugees?
That's fucked up, how incredibly colonialist that you think Israel was being generous in giving the indigenous people a giant concentration camp on a tiny sliver of their homeland.
They held an election and chose Hamas, knowing that Hamas' Charter had a mission statement of destruction of Israel. There was an armed conflict between Hamas and the PA and Hamas won, after throwing various rivals off apartment building roofs.
Hamas has attacked Israel consistently since that time. On 7 October, a line was crossed. Hamas has become too dangerous and vicious to be tolerated any longer and must be stamped out. It's a matter of self defence for Israel.
Does Israel take the risk of allowing another election in Gaza and having a Hamas clone win again?..... Of course not. Who would take that risk??!?!?
Israel's longterm goal has been to divide the Palestinians into Hamas and Fatah in order to avoid facing a unified Palestinian opposition, which is why Netanyahu funded them and considered them necessary. Hamas is consistently more popular than Abbas, who is seen as a witless sycophant and stooge of Israel.
Now you are arguing that there should be zero Palestinian government and it should be total apartheid with an even harder military edge.
That turns Israel into a pariah state, nice work. Without the pretence of the two state solution its just a much more evil form of South African apartheid.
You argue that Palestinians don't deserve elections, rights, safety and now argue that you just need more military force to keep them in place.
And you don't see that as racist?