Blessed silence...weird why you're afraid to actually refer or quote things to buttress your argument.
Next you'll say, "watch this youtube video" like the tinfoil hat guy you are.
In the 21st century, anti-Zionism means anti-Semitism
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
Next you'll say, "watch this youtube video" like the tinfoil hat guy you are.I gave you the link and the paragraph #.Blessed silence...weird why you're afraid to actually refer or quote things to buttress your argument.
You really are afraid to read it, aren't you?
Oh no, I know the reason why you refuse to cut and paste the references to your arguments.
We ALL know you'll take it out of context, mis-interpret it and we'll have a GREAT time mocking you for being so...you. You can't help yourself.
However, it's great that you're beginning to realize your...what should we call it.... your "limitations".
Sigh.Oh no, I know the reason why you refuse to cut and paste the references to your arguments.
We ALL know you'll take it out of context, mis-interpret it and we'll have a GREAT time mocking you for being so...you. You can't help yourself.
However, it's great that you're beginning to realize your...what should we call it.... your "limitations".
Lazy supremacists....
20. Hamas believes that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. However, without compromising its rejection of the Zionist entity and without relinquishing any Palestinian rights, Hamas considers the establishment of a fully sovereign and independent Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital along the lines of the 4th of June 1967, with the return of the refugees and the displaced to their homes from which they were expelled, to be a formula of national consensus.
Are you always this easy to manipulate? Gosh are you...you.
It only took a few posts to get you to do what I wanted.
Man, I bet I could get you to agree for me to fuck your ass in about 8 posts. I bet I could go bare in you with about 10 posts.
No wonder you hold the political opinions and thoughts you do. They can't be yours and must be someone else's.
I feel for you if this is how you live your life.
Last edited:
You acted like an asshole on purpose and think that proves anything but you being an asshole?Are you always this easy to manipulate? Gosh are you...you.
It only took a few posts to get you to do what I wanted.
Man, I bet I could get you to agree for me to fuck your ass in about 8 posts. I bet I could go bare in you with about 10 posts.
No wonder you hold the political opinions and thoughts you do. They can't be yours and must be someone else's.
I feel for you if this is how you live your life.
Show me a single post where you unambiguously condemned Hamas for their attack that specifically targeted civilians.
Your posts are compulsive attempts to blame Jews for Hamas' terror.
And you still refuse to even admit that Hamas butchered the elderly, women, and children in their terror campaign last week so all you can do is post emotionally laden tweets.
Shack is committing ethnic cleansing and genocide? You've really lost the plot.
Two groups of terrorists spend the year attacking each other and nearby civilians so you think that justifies Hamas' well coordinated slaughter of people in another pert of the country? And you wonder why everyone considers you an antisemite.
He pulls out the 'elected' as just another justification. Of course he also condemns Israelis for electing Netanyahu; no racist double standard there.
What he is unintentionally doing is reminding us that a good chunk of Palestinians support the Hamas terrorists. I definitely don't look forward to the next round of Palestinian polling where I fear that Hamas' actions will only make them more popular.
As a temporary measure. They say if Israel meets every demand of the PA, they will still reject any recognition of Israel.
BTW. You keep obsessing that Israel defines itself as the homeland of Jews yet you casually ignore Hamas wanting the entire region to be an Islamic state.
Definitely not at you.
It is for frank in particular and in general to bring attention to how disruptive he is to the mood of the TERB community. It is generally a fun place with a lot of interesting discussions.
Sure there are some heated arguments, but the level of animosity, hate and ill-will that frank brings is at a different level. He has a horrible influence on the overall mood of the board, brings nothing of value to board and the board would be better off without him. I'm sure many people think that, but I don't think that it's actually been said. I just wanted it typed down so it is said out loud.
I'm curious what other people think. I understand about free speech but would TERB be a better place without frank?
He incessantly spews hate speech. He wants the Jews driven into the sea but just uses code. He promotes hate as long as it's hate of the Jews.
Hamas and all Palestinians have the legal right to self defence against an illegal occupation.
Israel does not have the right of self defence inside Palestine any more than Russia can claim self defence in Ukraine.
Neither side is allowed to target civilians.
But Israel does it way more often.
Your Palestinian brand of Islamaphobia now has you defending genocide.
Sorry to bum out your day for noting how evil it is to support bombing children, starving 2.2 million people and a little genocide.
I'll try to keep it cheerier with some nice kid photos for you.
Enjoy the handiwork of your favourite apartheid government!
[Shack]Definitely not at you.
I figured it wasn't but just checking...
[Shack]It is for frank in particular and in general to bring attention to how disruptive he is to the mood of the TERB community. It is generally a fun place with a lot of interesting discussions.
Meh, everyone is entitled to their wrong opinions. I'd like it if he wasn't such an obvious troll but hey, can't have everything.
[Shack]Sure there are some heated arguments, but the level of animosity, hate and ill-will that frank brings is at a different level. He has a horrible influence on the overall mood of the board, brings nothing of value to board and the board would be better off without him. I'm sure many people think that, but I don't think that it's actually been said. I just wanted it typed down so it is said out loud.
[Shack]Not meant to be a personal criticism, but if you (generically, not specifically you.) get heated, it's not the other person's fault, it's your (generically, not specifically you.) fault. We are the only ones to choose how we react and thus we need to take responsibility for the actions we decide to take. This is true for this and many other aspects of life that are controversial.
[Shack]I'm curious what other people think. I understand about free speech but would TERB be a better place without frank?
Free thought/speech/ideas is very very tough in practice and this is a good example of it. Everyone mouths the principle but very few stand by it particularly those who state they are caring and inclusive. A LOT of people do not like what he does, he's obviously not that well read, has no depth and he brings little actual value to ANY subject, but I'd prefer for him not to be banned because of the necessity of free and open exchange of ideas. MAYBE 1 out of 50 posts he has is useful so I'd hate to miss that.
It's a little off-topic but it still applies...
I figured it wasn't but just checking...
[Shack]It is for frank in particular and in general to bring attention to how disruptive he is to the mood of the TERB community. It is generally a fun place with a lot of interesting discussions.
Meh, everyone is entitled to their wrong opinions. I'd like it if he wasn't such an obvious troll but hey, can't have everything.
[Shack]Sure there are some heated arguments, but the level of animosity, hate and ill-will that frank brings is at a different level. He has a horrible influence on the overall mood of the board, brings nothing of value to board and the board would be better off without him. I'm sure many people think that, but I don't think that it's actually been said. I just wanted it typed down so it is said out loud.
[Shack]Not meant to be a personal criticism, but if you (generically, not specifically you.) get heated, it's not the other person's fault, it's your (generically, not specifically you.) fault. We are the only ones to choose how we react and thus we need to take responsibility for the actions we decide to take. This is true for this and many other aspects of life that are controversial.
[Shack]I'm curious what other people think. I understand about free speech but would TERB be a better place without frank?
Free thought/speech/ideas is very very tough in practice and this is a good example of it. Everyone mouths the principle but very few stand by it particularly those who state they are caring and inclusive. A LOT of people do not like what he does, he's obviously not that well read, has no depth and he brings little actual value to ANY subject, but I'd prefer for him not to be banned because of the necessity of free and open exchange of ideas. MAYBE 1 out of 50 posts he has is useful so I'd hate to miss that.
It's a little off-topic but it still applies...
Last edited:
