"Israel, Similar to Apartheid": Ekos Canada Poll

[shack]

No, you have never replied.

And then you quote my reply:


shack said:
I can't read their minds. Asking us what other countries will agree to is total speculation.

Why don't you show us a map of the land you think the state of Israel is entitled to.

Guaranteed that you won't give a direct answer even though there is zero speculation as to what your own personal opinion is.

This will be the first time you won't give us your opinion because you don't think that Israel should exist at all but are too afraid to actually say so.

Do you realize how stupid your argument is?

It may not be the reply you were looking for or the type of reply but it is undeniably a reply. I responded back to you directly about your query. I did not turtle and totally ignore your post. I replied.

Let me help you.

From the Oxford Dictionary:

REPLY:

verb

"say something in response to something someone has said"

Go take it up with Oxford. Once you see that you're losing that debate, you'll call them liars and pro-apartheid.

I've clearly made my point, but I know that you always, always, always need to get in the last word. Unfortunately, it does mean that you are correct. It just means you can't accept losing. That's some serious character flaw.

Instead, you will just spew your typical garbage and use your usual political talking points, but that has nothing to do with what "reply" means. I replied and you quoted my reply.

I'll wait for your apology/admission that you were wrong. C'mon, be a mensch Potfooter. Hahahahahahaha.

 

[Klatuu]

[

And then you quote my reply:


shack said:
I can't read their minds. Asking us what other countries will agree to is total speculation.

Why don't you show us a map of the land you think the state of Israel is entitled to.

Guaranteed that you won't give a direct answer even though there is zero speculation as to what your own personal opinion is.

This will be the first time you won't give us your opinion because you don't think that Israel should exist at all but are too afraid to actually say so.

Do you realize how stupid your argument is?

It may not be the reply you were looking for or the type of reply but it is undeniably a reply. I responded back to you directly about your query. I did not turtle and totally ignore your post. I replied.

Let me help you.

From the Oxford Dictionary:

REPLY:

verb

"say something in response to something someone has said"

Go take it up with Oxford. Once you see that you're losing that debate, you'll call them liars and pro-apartheid.

I've clearly made my point, but I know that you always, always, always need to get in the last word. Unfortunately, it does mean that you are correct. It just means you can't accept losing. That's some serious character flaw.

Instead, you will just spew your typical garbage and use your usual political talking points, but that has nothing to do with what "reply" means. I replied and you quoted my reply.

I'll wait for your apology/admission that you were wrong. C'mon, be a mensch Potfooter. Hahahahahahaha.

Sad Shack has already answered. His reputation as an anti Palestinian racist is well earned and documented.

There would be no pali state regardless of who'd won.

 

[shack]

Shack has already answered.

Thanks for agreeing with me "little buddy". Clearly I replied to his post.

 

[Klatuu]

Thanks for agreeing with me "little buddy". Clearly I replied to his post.

Oh I’m not agreeing with you, you Shack of Sit. Actually that was a reply to another post in the past. Sorry to burst your bubble. You just can’t be honest about it and say what your position was. You are just an empty headed anti Palestinian racist.

Are you going to declare victory and run away soon? That’s your usual strategy when you get cornered.

 

[Klatuu]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705241447635522034

 

[shack]

Oh I’m not agreeing with you, you Shack of Sit. Actually that was a reply to another post in the past. Sorry to burst your bubble. You just can’t be honest about it and say what your position was. You are just an empty headed anti Palestinian racist.

Are you going to declare victory and run away soon? That’s your usual strategy when you get cornered.

Your greatest ability is hurling insults. Not having honest debates.

Once I've made my point why rehash it when you guys keep repeating the same lies. Listen closely little buddy:

 

[Frankfooter]

Hardly surprising coming from the biggest liar on the board. You are the pot calling the kettle black.
You lie every time you are losing a debate. BTW, I don't lie on the board. What for? It's anonymous.

And we were talking about whether I responded to a post of yours. That, in and of itself, is not political yet you manage to do your normal political, anti-Semitic, apartheid diatribe/verbal diarrhea. Why do you have so much hate.

I predicted what would happen. Potfooter has been exposed again for his lack of morality.

Shack.
Prove I lied or retract your statement.
If you're not acting like a troll, prove it.

 

[Frankfooter]

And then you quote my reply:


shack said:
I can't read their minds. Asking us what other countries will agree to is total speculation.

Why don't you show us a map of the land you think the state of Israel is entitled to.

Guaranteed that you won't give a direct answer even though there is zero speculation as to what your own personal opinion is.

This will be the first time you won't give us your opinion because you don't think that Israel should exist at all but are too afraid to actually say so.

Do you realize how stupid your argument is?

It may not be the reply you were looking for or the type of reply but it is undeniably a reply. I responded back to you directly about your query. I did not turtle and totally ignore your post. I replied.

Let me help you.

From the Oxford Dictionary:

REPLY:

verb

"say something in response to something someone has said"

Go take it up with Oxford. Once you see that you're losing that debate, you'll call them liars and pro-apartheid.

I've clearly made my point, but I know that you always, always, always need to get in the last word. Unfortunately, it does mean that you are correct. It just means you can't accept losing. That's some serious character flaw.

Instead, you will just spew your typical garbage and use your usual political talking points, but that has nothing to do with what "reply" means. I replied and you quoted my reply.

I'll wait for your apology/admission that you were wrong. C'mon, be a mensch Potfooter. Hahahahahahaha.

Shack, you didn't answer.
You challenged me to give you a direct answer. I gave you a direct answer.

You did not, you replied with a non-answer.

I can't read their minds. Asking us what other countries will agree to is total speculation.

This was in response to me asking you to provide a map of Israel and a map of what you think the two state solution could be.
Not only are you totally unable to even define the borders of the country you defend here, you are unable to even suggest a proposal for the only solution you back, the two state solution.
Instead you gave a non answer response.

I did what you requested, then you called me a liar.
You refused to answer directly and then called me a liar for saying you didn't answer directly.

Why can't you even tell us where the borders of Israel lie?

No wonder you and Israel get this kind of response from the world.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705305632771830161

 

[Frankfooter]

Your greatest ability is hurling insults. Not having honest debates.

Once I've made my point why rehash it when you guys keep repeating the same lies. Listen closely little buddy:

Netanyahu just did what you refused, he defined what he thinks the border of Israel is at the UN.
According to him and you, there is no state of Palestine.
Which leaves only apartheid Israel.

There was a bigger crowd and more Jewish support outside on the street than there was at the UN.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705358709432496435

 

[shack]

Shack.
Prove I lied or retract your statement.
If you're not acting like a troll, prove it.

I don't have to. I've done it on previous occasions and attempted (unsuccessfully) to sleaze your way out of it. You have no moral ethics.

As to this topic people can read and judge for themselves.

I proved you didn't know what you were talking about earlier in this thread. I made a very fair open and honest challenge and you chicken-shitted out of it the only way a liar can and that's by calling others a liar. Maybe you went to Trump University and learned how to major in lying.

I'll wait for your apology.

 

[Frankfooter]

I don't have to. I've done it on previous occasions and attempted (unsuccessfully) to sleaze your way out of it. You have no moral ethics.

As to this topic people can read and judge for themselves.

I proved you didn't know what you were talking about earlier in this thread. I made a very fair open and honest challenge and you chicken-shitted out of it the only way a liar can and that's by calling others a liar. Maybe you went to Trump University and learned how to major in lying.

I'll wait for your apology.

Same old, shack.
You come on with veiled threats about 'watching' people of my 'ilk', make loud and vague accusations and then you run away for another 6 months after your tactics are exposed.

So sure, you don't have to prove anything you say.
You can act like a troll if you like.
Just expect to be treated like a racist, apartheid loving troll.

And let me show you what good, moral Jews are doing.
These people I support.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1704256238341537803

 

[basketcase]

I don't care what a settler colonial apartheid supporter like you thinks of BDS.
...

Because you have zero interest in any peace plan that lets Israel and the Jewish population exist in any sense.

And since you know you can't say that too directly, you resort to idiotic name calling to defend your immoral, pro-violence, racist world view.

 

[basketcase]

Olmert wouldn't give Abbas a map stating what he was offering.
There was no deal and no state.

But I'm curious, are you saying you would support using Olmert's map as the basis of a two state solution?

What pure bullshit. Abbas was shown a detailed map. And more importantly, he could have easily chose to engage, negotiating what in Olmert's offer he felt reasonable and what he would want changed. Instead he walked away from the offer, simply because he profits more from the status quo than he would from a Palestinian state.

Of course you don't even want to discuss the details of the offer because you simply reject the concept of peace and would rather violence continue, as long as you can find a way to blame Jews for it.

 

[Frankfooter]

Because you have zero interest in any peace plan that lets Israel and the Jewish population exist in any sense.

And since you know you can't say that too directly, you resort to idiotic name calling to defend your immoral, pro-violence, racist world view.

Ending apartheid and letting both peoples live with full human rights, including the vote, is the only peace plan left now.
But of course the racists think that will lead to genocide because of their hatred of one people.

 

[basketcase]

A trope?
...

Yes, your use of anti-semitic tropes is one of the many aspects of antisemitism you have displayed. Thankfully I live in a country that condemns your hateful world view, your promotion of violence, and your vile racism.

 

[basketcase]

Lmao says the guy who didn't even read his own source for the correct numbers

Wow your posts are becoming incoherent. I posted the image of the actual questions while you wanted to rely on secondary analysis and made up alleged peace offers.

 

[basketcase]

Ending apartheid and letting both peoples live with full human rights, including the vote, is the only peace plan left now.
But of course the racists think that will lead to genocide because of their hatred of one people.

BDS does not endorse peace no matter how many excuses you want to make.

 

[basketcase]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705241447635522034

Yet you guys celebrate Palestinian maps that do the same. No racist double standard there.

At least Netanyahu can legitimately say that the map is the current area of Israeli control, not a plan for the future.

 

[Frankfooter]

What pure bullshit. Abbas was shown a detailed map. And more importantly, he could have easily chose to engage, negotiating what in Olmert's offer he felt reasonable and what he would want changed. Instead he walked away from the offer, simply because he profits more from the status quo than he would from a Palestinian state.

Of course you don't even want to discuss the details of the offer because you simply reject the concept of peace and would rather violence continue, as long as you can find a way to blame Jews for it.

You don't even find it sad that the best peace offer you think Israel ever gave didn't include a map.
Oh, of course not.

My mistake.

You, shack and every other Israel supporter don't do maps. You can't provide a map of what you think Israel is and you can't suggest a two state solution on a map.
Israel supporters don't do maps.

But Netanyahu did.
Netanyahu just showed the map of the one state apartheid solution you back but won't admit you back.
Its out in the open now.
There is no Palestine, only apartheid Israel.

Congrats.

You don't ever feel like this, do you?

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1705307100816023659

 

[Frankfooter]

BDS does not endorse peace no matter how many excuses you want to make.

BDS campaigns to end apartheid.
Why are you so against the peaceful end of apartheid?