I think the Tater is an asshole, but he's entitled to a fair trial.Typically, courts of law go far beyond 10 second YouTube clips for evidence of serious charges.
That may shock you, and even Mandrill, who says he's a lawyer. LMAO!
The fact that Mandrill is so committed to the narrative of guilt just because Tate is an asshole, is enough reason to remain firmly on the opposite side of that position.
What I object to is the continual false narrative where the Tater-People claim that the entire process is tainted and corrupt and oppressive with no facts to back up their tater-chatter.
No one here knows what the evidence will be at trial.
Your problem is you assume people you dislike have silly, prejudiced opinions without actually finding out what they really believe.
If the Tater gets found not guilty, I'll shrug and say "an asshole got off". And then I'll go read something else on the net. If Tate gets found guilty, you will spend the next 3 weeks ranting about how he was railroaded and screwed and framed. Because you're pretty invested in this whole issue. And I'm not.
Last edited: