Climate Change

[Frankfooter]

carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. plants need carbon dioxide



Dr. Tim Ball Defeats Michael Mann’s Climate Lawsuit (climatechangedispatch.com)

So?

1) A totally irrelevant statement to the climate change discussion
2) Ball was an idiot, does he have any peer assessed papers and a counter theory? Any evidence?

More places with wet bulb temps.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687979180326256640

More bleaching.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687873169074647040

CBC notes what Canada has experienced.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/climate-change-something-changed-summer-2023-canada-1.6929271

 

[canada-man]

So?

1) A totally irrelevant statement to the climate change discussion
2) Ball was an idiot, does he have any peer assessed papers and a counter theory? Any evidence?

More places with wet bulb temps.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687979180326256640

The Arabian Peninsula HAS A HOT ARID AND DRY DESERT CLIMATE!!!!


last year you posted something about a "drought" in Somalia that has a similar arid desert climate trying to blame "climate change"

 

[Frankfooter]

The Arabian Peninsula HAS A HOT ARID AND DRY DESERT CLIMATE!!!!


last year you posted something about a "drought" in Somalia that has a similar arid desert climate trying to blame "climate change"

That's the best you can do?
State the obvious and ignore the point?

You are the frog in the pot of water.

 

[canada-man]

That's the best you can do?
State the obvious and ignore the point?

You are the frog in the pot of water.

pot meets kettle all you do is quote fearmongering climate alarmist nonsense and ignore stuff that disagree. and resort to trolling when debunked. the earth had heatwaves like this in the 1930s and in the past before temperature records. and the so called recent global heat wave are caused by recent volcanic eruptions that spew out water vapor

i won't bother waste time post sources that you refuse to read

 

[Frankfooter]

pot meets kettle all you do is quote fearmongering climate alarmist nonsense and ignore stuff that disagree. and resort to trolling when debunked. the earth had heatwaves like this in the 1930s and in the past before temperature records. and the so called recent global heat wave are caused by recent volcanic eruptions that spew out water vapor

i won't bother waste time post sources that you refuse to read

I quote scientists.
You post bullshit.

NASA, NOAA, IPCC.
That's the science.

The 1930's were not warmer, that's bullshit.

This is the present, measured by trustworthy sources.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686738644143411202

We are now 29 days of record global temperatures.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1686340018468700160

 

[K Douglas]

No, its not the temporary increase in water vapour from Hunga Tonga.
Did you just read the Mann tweet that mentioned this earlier and just finally look it up?

First you guys argue that trace elements can't effect the atmosphere, now you're arguing that trace elements like an extra 10% temporary boost in water vapour can?
At least you're finally admitting that trace elements can effect the climate.
That's a start.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1687649875914043392

Quoting Mann the fraud, that's rich. This clown thinks CO2 is pollution. That's anti-science.

 

[Frankfooter]

Quoting Mann the fraud, that's rich. This clown thinks CO2 is pollution. That's anti-science.

Michael E Mann is a well respected scientist.
His work has been confirmed in court and by scientists over and over again.

The clowns are the people who don't think the Greenhouse Effect exists.
The ones that think every scientist is lying and only the plucky lobbyists from the oil industry are telling the truth.

 

[K Douglas]

Michael E Mann is a well respected scientist.
His work has been confirmed in court and by scientists over and over again.

The clowns are the people who don't think the Greenhouse Effect exists.
The ones that think every scientist is lying and only the plucky lobbyists from the oil industry are telling the truth.

Funniest thing I've read today. Mann is the definition of an intellectual fraud And he's a wimp and a weasel. Doesn't surprise me that you like him so much.

 

[Frankfooter]

Funniest thing I've read today. Mann is the definition of an intellectual fraud And he's a wimp and a weasel. Doesn't surprise me that you like him so much.

You need some better reading material if thats the funniest thing.

Though complaining that a scientist is a 'wimp' is pretty hilarious.

 

[JohnLarue]

Funniest thing I've read today. Mann is the definition of an intellectual fraud And he's a wimp and a weasel. Doesn't surprise me that you like him so much.

Michael Mann is the poster boy for what is wrong with climate science
had he been a lawyer he would have been disbarred for his fraud.

the fact he was never disciplined for his crime highlight how detached from the principles of science & how corrupt , climate science is..

Michael Mann is a nasty, evil. uncompromising zealot who perpetrated a fraud on the public.

 

[Frankfooter]

Michael Mann is the poster boy for what is wrong with climate science
had he been a lawyer he would have been disbarred for his fraud.

the fact he was never disciplined for his crime highlight how detached from the principles of science &corrupt , climate science is..

Michael Mann is a nasty, evil. uncompromising zealot who perpetrated a fraud on the public.

That's just oil funded slander.

Go ahead and prove your claim if you can.
But I know you can't.

 

[K Douglas]

That's just oil funded slander.

Go ahead and prove your claim if you can.
But I know you can't.

You're delusional

 

[Frankfooter]

You're delusional

There is nothing to back up your claims yet you call me delusional?

 

[oil&gas]

 

[canada-man]

That's just oil funded slander.

Go ahead and prove your claim if you can.
But I know you can't.

constantly accusing others of being funded by oil only shows you resorting to trolling when losing an argument and shows your eco-hypocrisy when you refuse to stop using products made from oil

 

[Frankfooter]

constantly accusing others of being funded by oil only shows you resorting to trolling when losing an argument and shows your eco-hypocrisy when you refuse to stop using products made from oil

There are two sides to this debate.
1) Science
2) the oil industry

That's it.
You picked your side.
I'm sure you'd be backing the tobacco industry if that debate were still ongoing.

 

[canada-man]

There are two sides to this debate.
1) Science
2) the oil industry

That's it.
You picked your side.
I'm sure you'd be backing the tobacco industry if that debate were still ongoing.

equating disagreeing with you with tobacco industry is a logical fallacy of false equivalency cult members are known to use illogical arguments

science unlike your climate cult does resort to censorship and 97% appeal to numbers logical fallacy and trolling

constantly crying "oil industry" when you refuse to stop using products they sell is not an argument

 

[Frankfooter]

equating disagreeing with you with tobacco industry is a logical fallacy of false equivalency cult members are known to use illogical arguments

science unlike your climate cult does resort to censorship and 97% appeal to numbers logical fallacy and trolling

constantly crying "oil industry" when you refuse to stop using products they sell is not an argument

Science:

IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

www.ipcc.ch

Oil industry:

Heartland Institute - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Its that clear cut.
And no, the IPCC doesn't censor anyone.
The logical fallacy here is:
a) Claiming that because just about every legit scientist agrees on a subject that its 'appeal to numbers'.
b) claiming that people have to personally stop using oil products and/or plastics entirely to support systematic change.

There is no scientific theory to back your claims and no evidence.

 

[canada-man]

Science:

IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

www.ipcc.ch

Oil industry:

Heartland Institute - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Its that clear cut.
And no, the IPCC doesn't censor anyone.
The logical fallacy here is:
a) Claiming that because just about every legit scientist agrees on a subject that its 'appeal to numbers'.
b) claiming that people have to personally stop using oil products and/or plastics entirely to support systematic change.

There is no scientific theory to back your claims and no evidence.

Wikipedia is not a valid source


I never mentioned the IPCC i said your climate cult members can't you read


here is an example of your climate cultists censoring a scientist

Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Has Speech Canceled After Saying ‘Climate Change Is Not a Crisis’

“The postponement of Dr. John Clauser’s presentation ... is troubling, but not surprising,” Gregory Wrightstone says.

www.dailysignal.com

The International Monetary Fund canceled a talk with physicist John Clauser after he said, “Climate change is not a crisis.”

The IMF had invited Clauser, the recipient of a Nobel Prize in Physics, to deliver a Webex speech on July 25. Five days before the event, Clauser was informed his speech had been “postponed.” The lecture has yet to be rescheduled.

According to the educational climate organization CO2 Coalition, where Clauser serves on the board, Pablo Moreno, director of the IMF’s Independent Evaluation Office, read the flyer for Clauser’s lecture and “immediately canceled,” or technically “postponed,” the event.

 

[Frankfooter]

Wikipedia is not a valid source


I never mentioned the IPCC i said your climate cult members can't you read


here is an example of your climate cultists censoring a scientist

Nobel Prize-Winning Scientist Has Speech Canceled After Saying ‘Climate Change Is Not a Crisis’

“The postponement of Dr. John Clauser’s presentation ... is troubling, but not surprising,” Gregory Wrightstone says.

www.dailysignal.com

The International Monetary Fund canceled a talk with physicist John Clauser after he said, “Climate change is not a crisis.”

The IMF had invited Clauser, the recipient of a Nobel Prize in Physics, to deliver a Webex speech on July 25. Five days before the event, Clauser was informed his speech had been “postponed.” The lecture has yet to be rescheduled.

According to the educational climate organization CO2 Coalition, where Clauser serves on the board, Pablo Moreno, director of the IMF’s Independent Evaluation Office, read the flyer for Clauser’s lecture and “immediately canceled,” or technically “postponed,” the event.

Excellent example, CM.

You picked an 80 year old experimental physicist who has worked for the CO2 Coalition, a group that has been funded by the Mercer Family Foundation. They've donated almost $4 million to climate change denial.
Clauser has never published a single paper on the climate.

John Francis Clauser is an experimental physicist and member of the board of directors4 of the CO2 Coalition, a group that claims that both CO2 emissions and associated global warming would be “of great benefit to life on earth.”5

You picked someone supported by the oil industry who doesn't study the climate.
You confirmed my point.