I live in this society and want to change it for the better.pot meets kettle people won't take your climate cult seriously if you don't practice what you preach
and you use computers and smart phones to post on terb those have plastic parts that are from OIL you like to hate so much
I live in this society and want to change it for the better.
You want the oil companies to make more money making your own life worse.
Your argument is tired and wrongheaded.
Branding climate activists hypocrites for wanting to decrease fossil fuel consumption while at the same time burning them is, therefore, a logical fallacy.
Branding climate activists hypocrites for wanting to decrease fossil fuel consumption while at the same time burning them is, therefore, a logical fallacy.
Abolitionists who opposed slavery in the United States, for instance, wore clothes that were spun from the cotton harvested by slaves.
"But that did not make them hypocrites," Harvard historian Naomi Oreskes told The Nation in 2015.
"It just meant that they were also part of the slave economy, and they knew it. That is why they acted to change the system, not just their clothes."
The hypocrite argument also falls apart because it ignores big structural factors.
Personal decisions or forced decisions?
Sure, some people do live off the grid, or walk and ride their bikes everywhere. But, for most of us, it's nearly impossible to escape creating greenhouse gases.
Fossil fuels don't just heat our homes and fuel our vehicles, they are also the foundation of almost everything from electronics to painkillers.
"Our whole society is structured around fossil fuels," says Duncan Kenyon of the Pembina Institute.
"It's the backbone of our society, our economy."
It's, therefore, nonsensical to suggest that having a carbon footprint means you can't legitimately raise concerns about climate change and its potentially dire ramifications.
Protestors demonstrating cuts to the health-care system wouldn't likely forgo lifesaving treatment at a hospital if they needed it.
So are you telling us that you don't know the difference between burning oil into the atmosphere and converting oil into other products, not the concept of amounts.
In order for those products to be made and transported by trucks into stores, gasoline had to have been burnt and CO2 had to have been createdSo are you telling us that you don't know the difference between burning oil into the atmosphere and converting oil into other products, not the concept of amounts.
Good to know
You posted the global temperature map, gloating that the Antarctic was below average temperature yet you ignored the huge swathe of the world that was well above. I guess all you have left is random excuses now.it's summer there were similar heat waves in the 1930s when C02 levels where lower
...
those products are transported by trucks from factories to warehouses and to stores and shops that sell themSo are you telling us that you don't know the difference between burning oil into the atmosphere and converting oil into other products, not the concept of amounts.
Good to know.
I know, you only read hate sources and right wing disinformation.i don't read government funded and elite family funded propaganda from the CBC, the nation and other related sources
Grossly over simplified.
tar sands. West Texas crude.
shipped ( piped )to the US refineries on the coast at a significant discount. Refined and sold to the world as by products at significant profits…
Products from the Oil Sands: Dilbit, Synbit and Synthetic Crude Explained | Oil Sands Magazine
Oil sands facilities produce one of two products: either a heavy marketable (non-upgraded) diluted bitumen, or a light upgraded synthetic crude oil. Both can be sold to refineries for conversion into final consumer products.www.oilsandsmagazine.com
And if it were actually all about saving the environment…..we got bigger things to worry about.
in order for a great many products to be made, they requite heat from energy i.e most plastic partsIn order for those products to be made and transported by trucks into stores, gasoline had to have been burnt and CO2 had to have been created
No, only 23% were started by humans.Most of the 667 fires that have erupted across Greece in recent weeks were started “by human hand”, the country’s senior climate crisis official has said.
No, most forest fires started by humans are done so out of carelessness, not intentionally.previous wildfires in Algeria set by Arsonists
The right wing marks are so behind the times.in order for a great many products to be made, they requite heat from energy i.e most plastic parts
e.g. cement has to be heated to 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit
a lot of metal parts are heated/ formed, multiple times
the lonnies have no idea how energy intensive their lives are
Pot meets kettle you NEVER read sources that disagree with you. All you do is post elite funded and terrorist linked sources and regurgitate their propagandaI know, you only read hate sources and right wing disinformation.
That's why you think Amnesty International is 'terrorist 'propaganda'.
Your mind is filled with the hate the right wing sells you to keep you doing what they want.
What Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán Understand About Your Brain
Why do some people who support Trump also wind up believing conspiracy theories? There’s a scientific explanation for that.www.politico.com
If you bother to read the sources I linked quoting Government of both countries all saying arsonists are setting fires. and if you did high school geography you will learn that Algeria near the coast and Greece all have climates with hot dry summers and cool rainy winters aka the Mediterranean climate.No, most forest fires started by humans are done so out of carelessness, not intentionally.
You're spreading disinformation again.
How Canada’s wildfires start: climate misinformation explained | The Narwhal
How are wildfire conspiracies like arson and space lasers spreading? How bad are Canada’s wildfires? An explainerthenarwhal.ca
They love to preach, but they dont practice any of it themselves. Guys like Bill gates and DiCaprio fly around in private planes which create more CO2's in 1 flight then an entire family does in 1 year driving their cars. They are the ultimate hypocrites.in order for a great many products to be made, they requite heat from energy i.e most plastic parts
e.g. cement has to be heated to 2,700 degrees Fahrenheit
a lot of metal parts are heated/ formed, multiple times
the lonnies have no idea how energy intensive their lives are
- We have only 45 years of oil left, so we have no choice but to switch to electric cars anyways.