Nope, the coke was found on Friday.Wasn't the coke found on Sunday?
And - like I said - you can't just line up 200 randoms and forcibly test them. You have to have probable cause and 200:1 odds aren't probable cause.
And presumably when the coke was found those 200 people could have gone home and washed their hands / worn different clothes / thrown away the surgical gloves used to plant the coke. So your "tests" would be ridiculously ineffective.
Why would the untested allegations of a criminal against an accused be placed in front of a judge at his sentencing hearing on another matter?.... They're highly prejudicial to the accused and probably bullshit. No competent legal official / judge / lawyer would allow that shit to happen for an instant.
Also, Shapley and whistleblower X are not criminals. They are former IRS agents, who had to go through rigorous questioning, by both dems and gop's, to obtain whistleblower status. Therefore, the judge should be allowed to consider their 15 hours of notes, before the judge makes her decision, on whether Hunter's plea agreement, will be approved, or not??
