Who brought the Coke to the White House?

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,702
93,655
113

Gee, I wonder why they are so uncurious on figuring out how cocaine got into the most secure location on the planet? But wait, it gets better. Secret Service spokesman Anthony Gugliemi said they declined conducting interviews because the interviews could infringe on individuals’ civil rights. Funny how the Biden admin is suddenly worried about not ‘infringing’ on people’s civil rights. Cover up.
Yeah, well....... Ordering random people to attend at the police station to answer questions on the bare possibility that 1 of them MIGHT BE the person who left a baggie of coke at the WH 2 weeks ago is a major fucking constitutional breach of civil rights, isn't it?....

Let's do an example. You were at a Taco Bell in Mississauga on July 2. Some coke was left in the washroom. Suddenly this afternoon a half-dozen cops show up at your place, grab you by the arm and yank you down to 22 Division to get grilled for 20 minutes about whether you were the guy who left the coke (as opposed to the other 347 patrons who were at the Taco Bell that day).

You think that just maybe-maybe-maybe-maybe that's a breach of your constitutional civil rights? Just perhaps??!?!?!?!?

Cos Mitchy, it sure as hell fucking is!

And that's why no one is actually interrogating people about the coke at the WH today. And the folks on TV are lying about this shit, just to get you going. They fucking KNOW that it's not legal to interrogate people about that blow. Just like they lied about "Trump winning the election" and 100's of other things as well.
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
23,475
10,206
113
Yeah, well....... Ordering random people to attend at the police station to answer questions on the bare possibility that 1 of them MIGHT BE the person who left a baggie of coke at the WH 2 weeks ago is a major fucking constitutional breach of civil rights, isn't it?....

Let's do an example. You were at a Taco Bell in Mississauga on July 2. Some coke was left in the washroom. Suddenly this afternoon a half-dozen cops show up at your place, grab you by the arm and yank you down to 22 Division to get grilled for 20 minutes about whether you were the guy who left the coke (as opposed to the other 347 patrons who were at the Taco Bell that day).

You think that just maybe-maybe-maybe-maybe that's a breach of your constitutional civil rights? Just perhaps??!?!?!?!?

Cos Mitchy, it sure as hell fucking is!

And that's why no one is actually interrogating people about the coke at the WH today. And the folks on TV are lying about this shit, just to get you going. They fucking KNOW that it's not legal to interrogate people about that blow. Just like they lied about "Trump winning the election" and 100's of other things as well.
Yes, but this is the white house, not Taco Bell!!
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,702
93,655
113
Yes, but this is the white house, not Taco Bell!!
Same rules. It's the constitution.

If it was a bomb or anthrax - sure, people would be a lot more anxious. But it's coke. You know how many tons of blow were snarfled in Toronto alone last night by annoying club goers?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,047
2,538
113

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,702
93,655
113
If this bag of coke brings down the Bidens, it may have the effect of taking down a couple of serial sexual assault perpetrators in the process! Sort of like Al Capone going to jail for tax evasion. She should be cheering this investigation on!
The bag of coke will be forgotten by next week and we'll move on to Hunter's laptop, Hunter's bribery in Ukraine or Joe slipping while jogging or some other "outrage".

The coke was almost certainly planted and there is no earthly reason to connect it to the Bidens. But nice try.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,702
93,655
113
Dan Bongino is an expert on law enforcement policy and organizations, isn't he Mitch?

No one is better qualified or more neutral and powerful in his analysis..... :geek:
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
23,475
10,206
113
Dan Bongino is an expert on law enforcement policy and organizations, isn't he Mitch?

No one is better qualified or more neutral and powerful in his analysis..... :geek:
Well, Bongino was a secret service agent for 12 years, and he knows that the whole coke thing was a coverup!!
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,702
93,655
113
Well, Bongino was a secret service agent for 12 years, and he knows that the whole coke thing was a coverup!!
How was it a cover up, Mitchy?

Why would the FBI not arrest Hunter, if Hunter is already a notorious coke head and is already facing charges?

Why would the coke be Hunter's, if Hunter was in a totally different part of the WH and had left 3 days earlier?

Surely the coke is a plant, designed to drive Fox News ratings for a few days?
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
23,475
10,206
113
How was it a cover up, Mitchy?

Why would the FBI not arrest Hunter, if Hunter is already a notorious coke head and is already facing charges?

Why would the coke be Hunter's, if Hunter was in a totally different part of the WH and had left 3 days earlier?

Surely the coke is a plant, designed to drive Fox News ratings for a few days?
Hunter was at the white house on Friday. KJP lied about that fact. Bongino said that 200 people at most, could have had access to the west wing, where the coke was found. Therefore, the 200 people (including Hunter), should have been tested for coke. However, the secret service and the FBI, were told not to test anybody. Reason being, if the coke turned out to be Hunter's, then this fact would furthur complicate Hunter's plea hearing on July 26th.

On another matter, Weiss and Garland are trying to keep Shapley's and Whistblower x's notes, away from the judge on July 26th. IMHO, the whole thing is a huge coverup. Hopefully the GOP will keep on it, and Hunter's "sweetheart" deal will be cancelled by the judge on July 26th!!
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,702
93,655
113
Hunter was at the white house on Friday. KJP lied about that fact. Bongino said that 200 people at most, could have had access to the west wing, where the coke was found. Therefore, the 200 people (including Hunter), should have been tested for coke. However, the secret service and the FBI, were told not to test anybody. Reason being, if the coke turned out to be Hunter's, then this fact would furthur complicate Hunter's plea hearing on July 26th.
Wasn't the coke found on Sunday?

And - like I said - you can't just line up 200 randoms and forcibly test them. You have to have probable cause and 200:1 odds aren't probable cause.

And presumably when the coke was found those 200 people could have gone home and washed their hands / worn different clothes / thrown away the surgical gloves used to plant the coke. So your "tests" would be ridiculously ineffective.
On another matter, Weiss and Garland are trying to keep Shapley's and Whistblower x's notes, away from the judge on July 26th. IMHO, the whole thing is a huge coverup. Hopefully the GOP will keep on it, and Hunter's "sweetheart" deal will be cancelled by the judge on July 26th!!
Why would the untested allegations of a criminal against an accused be placed in front of a judge at his sentencing hearing on another matter?.... They're highly prejudicial to the accused and probably bullshit. No competent legal official / judge / lawyer would allow that shit to happen for an instant.

😼
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
7,470
3,653
113
Hunter was at the white house on Friday. KJP lied about that fact. Bongino said that 200 people at most, could have had access to the west wing, where the coke was found. Therefore, the 200 people (including Hunter), should have been tested for coke. However, the secret service and the FBI, were told not to test anybody. Reason being, if the coke turned out to be Hunter's, then this fact would furthur complicate Hunter's plea hearing on July 26th.

On another matter, Weiss and Garland are trying to keep Shapley's and Whistblower x's notes, away from the judge on July 26th. IMHO, the whole thing is a huge coverup. Hopefully the GOP will keep on it, and Hunter's "sweetheart" deal will be cancelled by the judge on July 26th!!
What evidence is there that Hunter was at the White House on the Friday in question?
 
Toronto Escorts