Climate Change
- Thread starter Addict2sex
- Start date
Not really. It is you ateempting to defclect from the overwhwlming consnus among real scientists. It is the same level of ostrich like behavious on the part of you and your fellow deniers and obfuscators.
Oh, I am quite sure these are headlines that exist somewhere.
It would just be helpful if we had context.
consensus is appeal to numbers logical fallacy
The most highly cited paper supposedly found 97 per cent of published scientific studies support man-made global warming. But in addition to poor survey methodology, that tabulation is often misrepresented. Most papers (66 per cent) actually took no position. Of the remaining 34 per cent, 33 per cent supported at least a weak human contribution to global warming. So divide 33 by 34 and you get 97 per cent, but this is unremarkable since the 33 per cent includes many papers that critique key elements of the IPCC position.
another one who is brainwashed by TV propaganda
during the
crying "denying climate change " is a propaganda slogan used to shut down debate
newspaper clippings are archived by newspapers all over the U.S and canada they are available for anyone to read them
the earth's climate is NOT static can you point to anytime on earth's history where the climate was stable?
what is the best average temperature for earth?
That totally sounds like the reply of someone in a cult.
Take the post about Greta, you posted about a tweet she made when she was 15 as if it somehow was a) a prediction, b) a statement by a scientist and refused to debate the point further when I pointed out where it came from and what the article says. That's the move of someone who won't respond and debate and instead 'dismisses' all contrary evidence to their faith.
If you want to prove you're not in a cult feel free to see if we can have an actual debate about the science and the evidence.
Lets start with
Evidence - do you deny that the global temperature has risen by about 1.2ºC, as predicted by scientists, since the start of the industrial revolution?
Science - do you or do you not believe that the greenhouse effect exists and can affect the climate?
If you reply with yet another cut and paste reply it'll be confirmation that you can't argue the subject at all.
Fair?
If you're going to insult me man up and reply to the posts we both know you are reading.
Are you a coward?
Not sure where you got your information from, but long exposure to 2,000 CO2 ppm levels leads to headache, dizziness, difficulty breathing.
Exposure exceeding 2,000 ppm most people have to stop working, and ability to even think is severely reduced.
Around 5,000 ppm body’s functions will be seriously disrupted, causing loss of consciousness and confusion.
There is absolutely no way sailors could function being on a submarine for even 1 day when the CO2 levels are 5,000 ppm
Link: https://www.heimantech.com/news/index.php?type=detail&id=75
Last edited:
more projecting and more insults from Franky when he cannot refute those who disagree with his climate alarmist ideology
the global temps rise and falls for thousands of years the temps are NOT static
Has the temperature ever risen 1.2ºC in about 50-75 years before?
If so, what was the cause?
How do you explain the rise in temperature?
Why do you think it won't keep going up, as predicted?
Can you discuss the issue honestly?
Current CO2 levels are 420ppm: https://www.co2.earth/daily-co2
Over 1 year its only gone up by 2.23ppm (or 0.53%)
At current rate CO2 levels should only rise by 100 to 200 ppm at the most over the next 50 years.
But lets be conservative and say it goes up to 700ppm.
Since we only have 45 years of oil left there's no way the air could ever become so unhealthy that we couldnt breathe anymore.
And there's no way Greenland or the poles are gonna melt because CO2 went up 200 to 300 ppm.
Get a fucking brain people. Stop listening to the fear-mongerers and start thinking for yourself
Over 1 year its only gone up by 2.23ppm (or 0.53%)
At current rate CO2 levels should only rise by 100 to 200 ppm at the most over the next 50 years.
But lets be conservative and say it goes up to 700ppm.
Since we only have 45 years of oil left there's no way the air could ever become so unhealthy that we couldnt breathe anymore.
And there's no way Greenland or the poles are gonna melt because CO2 went up 200 to 300 ppm.
Get a fucking brain people. Stop listening to the fear-mongerers and start thinking for yourself
the earth is MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD according to mainstream scientists
people started recording temperatures in the last 100-200 years
read a book on earth science and related fields
' earth science' Search Results for Toronto Public Library
www.torontopubliclibrary.ca
co2 levels in submarines - Google SearchNot sure where you got your information from, but long exposure to 2,000 CO2 ppm levels leads to headache, dizziness, difficulty breathing.
Exposure exceeding 2,000 ppm most people have to stop working, and ability to even think is severely reduced.
Around 5,000 ppm body’s functions will be seriously disrupted, causing loss of consciousness and confusion.
There is absolutely no way sailors could function being on a submarine for even 1 day when the CO2 levels are 5,000 ppm
Link: https://www.heimantech.com/news/index.php?type=detail&id=75
"Around 5,000 ppm body’s functions will be seriously disrupted, causing loss of consciousness and confusion."
only if the CO2 has displaced significant amounts of O2
no problem hanging out in a greenhouse
Last edited:
you post laugh emojis valcazar, rather than respond with factual information or a rational counter argument
cowardly
The climate alarmists are so wacked out & so uncompromising they epoxy glued their hands to the roadway using industrial epoxy
(1) Climate activists in Germany are likely going to require amputation after using concrete and industrial epoxy to glue their hands to the road. : facepalm (reddit.com)
There is no action these lunatics will not undertake to "fight" climate change , including intentionally misleading of the public via subliminal images
if you want to call it the evil conspiracy, that is your choice,
or perhaps multiple groups of glue guys/ gals across Europe are completely self motivated to go to such extremes ??
there is nothing adorable about it.
there is nothing funny about it.
nothing but really bad shit will come of this
what is wrong with you ??
Eco-protester who sabotaged George Osborne's wedding is a hypocrite ex- librarian who took trip to Thailand months after declaring a 'climate emergency' in Somerset
An eco-protester who targeted George Osborne at his wedding can today be revealed as a former librarian and town councillor – who holidayed in Thailand a few months after declaring a ‘climate emergency’ in Somerset.
Shelagh Day, 62, is a well-known campaigner in Bruton, Somerset, where she and Mr Osborne are both residents.
Last weekend, she caused uproar after showering the former Chancellor and his new wife Thea Rogers with orange confetti as they left St Mary’s Church following their nuptials.
The stunt, in front of the Press, was a copycat version of Just Stop Oil’s use of orange paint and powder to disrupt sports events. The protest group initially appeared to claim responsibility for it, but backtracked after it was slammed by the public and condemned by both Tory and Labour MPs.
The Mail on Sunday tracked Ms Day, a divorcee, to her modest terrace home in Bruton on Wednesday. She answered the door and claimed: ‘It wasn’t me.’
But locals – including other town councillors – all identified her as the Osborne wedding protester, who evaded security to chuck confetti over the newlyweds.
Residents said Ms Day was linked to One Planet Bruton, an environmental group that in 2019 successfully campaigned for Bruton Town Council to declare the town was in a ‘climate emergency’.
Six months after the declaration, Ms Day went on a three-week holiday to Thailand, according to a travel blog written by one of her friends.
It is likely she made the 10,000-mile round-trip by aeroplane. If so, any such flight would have generated 3.3 tons of carbon emissions – equivalent to driving 18,500 miles in a typical petrol car. Ms Day also owns a small petrol hatchback.
Protester who targeted Osborne's wedding jetted off to Thailand after declaring a climate emergency | Daily Mail Online
An eco-protester who targeted George Osborne at his wedding can today be revealed as a former librarian and town councillor – who holidayed in Thailand a few months after declaring a ‘climate emergency’ in Somerset.
Shelagh Day, 62, is a well-known campaigner in Bruton, Somerset, where she and Mr Osborne are both residents.
Last weekend, she caused uproar after showering the former Chancellor and his new wife Thea Rogers with orange confetti as they left St Mary’s Church following their nuptials.
The stunt, in front of the Press, was a copycat version of Just Stop Oil’s use of orange paint and powder to disrupt sports events. The protest group initially appeared to claim responsibility for it, but backtracked after it was slammed by the public and condemned by both Tory and Labour MPs.
The Mail on Sunday tracked Ms Day, a divorcee, to her modest terrace home in Bruton on Wednesday. She answered the door and claimed: ‘It wasn’t me.’
But locals – including other town councillors – all identified her as the Osborne wedding protester, who evaded security to chuck confetti over the newlyweds.
Residents said Ms Day was linked to One Planet Bruton, an environmental group that in 2019 successfully campaigned for Bruton Town Council to declare the town was in a ‘climate emergency’.
Six months after the declaration, Ms Day went on a three-week holiday to Thailand, according to a travel blog written by one of her friends.
It is likely she made the 10,000-mile round-trip by aeroplane. If so, any such flight would have generated 3.3 tons of carbon emissions – equivalent to driving 18,500 miles in a typical petrol car. Ms Day also owns a small petrol hatchback.
Protester who targeted Osborne's wedding jetted off to Thailand after declaring a climate emergency | Daily Mail Online
Now you don't believe in the entire field of paleoclimatology?the earth is MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD according to mainstream scientists
people started recording temperatures in the last 100-200 years
read a book on earth science and related fields
' earth science' Search Results for Toronto Public Library
Yet you think you are informed enough to claim either you know more than NASA or that you think NASA is lying to everyone in the world?
