Hot Pink List

Titanic Submersible

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,477
1,293
113



Late Thursday the Wall Street Journal reported that "A top secret military acoustic detection system designed to spot enemy submarines first heard what the U.S. Navy suspected was the Titan submersible implosion hours after the submersible began its voyage," and that "the U.S. system detected what it suspected was the sound of an implosion near the debris site discovered Thursday."


What's more, it's not like the military took days to try and figure out what the sound was. "While not definitive, this information was immediately shared with the Incident Commander to assist with the ongoing search and rescue mission."

So, the Biden administration knew on Sunday (while not definitive), that the submarine sounded as if it had imploded hours into its journey. What's more, they let everyone think the passengers were alive.








Now that the story has served its purpose and the White House’s ” historic ” press secretary looks to move to even more dramatic geopolitical shocks, we are confident that it will be some variation of 'out of respect for the families,' or 'at the company's request.'

In the end, however, it's not like a diversion was even needed: for those wondering how many minutes the mainstream media has devoted today to the IRS whistleblower’ story we have the answer: 0.


Sunday: US Navy detects implosion of the Titan, doesn’t inform public
Monday: “TITAN IS MISSING!!”
Tuesday: “BANGING IS HEARD!!”
Wednesday: “RUNNING OUT OF AIR!!”
Thursday: “WRECKAGE FOUND!!”

They knew the outcome 4 days ago, yet they
The Same Day H.Biden pleads guilty
Coincidence I think not

They tried to milk it as long as they could but air running out was their deadline.


The WSJ is reporting the US Navy detected the Titan implosion on Sunday but Biden held the news until today's whistleblower testimony on Hunter
The entire thing was a distraction op…. Never let a crisis go to wastes… Or Never let a waste have a crisis...
By Hunter Biden, US Navy Reserve.

PS. To hide this fact from the families while the "rescue" was ongoing is unforgivable. Milking this sub story has been standard media procedure, your attention is always being diverted from something more serious
 
Last edited:

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,477
1,293
113
Cliff Notes:

The clown that ran the operation is rumored to have put a window on this POS that was pressure rated for less than 1/3 of the ultimate depth.

He also reportedly stated that he didn't want to hire middle aged white guys, because they "weren't inspiring."

Diversity Equalities Inclusion now killed a billionaire due to diversity hire .
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
Maybe…but then where are all the government services for that boat of 500 migrants that sank in the Mediterranean?

And, as far as “taxpayers” go,, do these billionaires even pay any taxes? Or are the rest of us picking up the tab for their arrogant thrill-seeking?
My point is clear: If you wish to deny government funds to preventable expenses, then YOU , ME, EVERYONE are benefitting at some level from SOME things we do that cause an expense for everyone else that THEY DO NOT incur for themselves.

That is obviously my point which a lot of you don't comprehend.
 
Last edited:

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
Maybe…but then where are all the government services for that boat of 500 migrants that sank in the Mediterranean?

And, as far as “taxpayers” go,, do these billionaires even pay any taxes? Or are the rest of us picking up the tab for their arrogant thrill-seeking?
What taxes? What goverment services?

City of Toronto taxes? HST?

Zimbabwean income taxes? Sarnia social services, what should they have done for the 500 migrants?

Swiss import duties on Australian cheese?

Your comments are so unclear, what EXACTLY is your point for Canadian taxpayers? Canadian Governments\?
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
When a boat full of migrants sink it only gets a minute of coverage.
Lets look at the tax code and see how much taxes the top 1% pay compared to the working class.
They pay ENORMOUS amounts of tax.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: johnd5050

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
Should tax payers also not pay for physically handicapped children because their mothers were smokers or addicts?
Think about what you are saying.
What is your point? What is the point I am making, have you read what I wrote? Some people have in mind what they want to say, and barely glance at what they are actually responding to.

FOCUS!

What I am saying is that taxes, government spending - we pay, and some of us pay more than we use, others don't. But if you want to go the route of tallying up for every person what they spend and what they get back - that's not government, that's a store.

I ( I despair that I need to spell it out for you) , am saying that - let me use your example - yes, we MUST pay for handicapped children etc, and we also must provide health care for smokers, and children of addicts, BUT WE ALSO must provide emergency services to motorcyclists that are 17 times more likely than car occupants to get injured etc.

But we ALSO must provide services to extremely expensive activites like skydiving etc.

Once you start picking and choosing which activities you rescue, you are handing ENORMOUS power to government to control our lives.

Please, I beg you , wait 10 minutes, re-read what I wrote a few times, before you respond.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jenesis

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
Amazing how we pay for emergency services with our taxes and now folks want to strip folks from getting help from the very same emergency services we pay for. I guess the next time one gets into a car accident, pay for it out of pocket for fire, police and ambulance. Hey, if you didn't get into the car and drive, it wouldn't have happened. LOL
Both of you make PRECISELY the point I am making.

If you go that route, of the government deciding what is allowable, to receive services, freedom is gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
Could be easily defined.

1. 8 hours if free search x 2 personal.
2. Any activity off the ground or beneath the water surface more than 50ft.
3. Unnecessary endangerment of rescue personnel.
4. Any above ground activity with a excursion company is covered.

A person who gets trampled while riding an elephant is easily found.
A person gored on a safari is easily found.
A skydiver is easily located most times.
A boat sinking can be radiod in and easily found.
What about smoking?
Alcohol?
Obesity?
Riding a motorcycle?

Please "EASILY IDENTIFY" how you feel about these.
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
There is precedence for municipalities recovering the cost of rescue services. The most famous and most common is rescuing people off the ice on Lake Simcoe. I don’t think it’s generally a hefty hit, but do seem to recall a bill for $20,000 somewhere.

why?
Because venturing onto the ice when conditions are known to be unsafe. Puts responders lives at risk, and cost a bunch of $$. Money that comes out the municipalities budgets. Basically a lot of tourist every year, require police, fire, EMS, but don’t pay taxes in the Muni.

I think ( not sure) people that have gone skiing/boarding when snowpack is also known to be unsafe……

Will they go after the estates? Owner of the company? Doubt it, but they should.
What about smokers and obese people?
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
As far as we might be concerned? I’d suggest anytime authorities advise the public not to do X because conditions are unsafe.

Don’t go on ice when it’s unsafe.
Don’t snowboard when there’s avalanche risk.
Don’t venture into flood/fire zones
Don’t swim at X beach. Rip tides
Etc and so on.
What do you say about obesity and smoking|?
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
As a % billionaires don't pay as much as they should. They have access to tools and techniques even most others in the top of the income brackets don't.
Nonsense, the rich pay a monstrous proportion of total tax.

The top 10% income earners pay 50% of total taxes.


Case closed.
 

carvesg

Perb member in your mix 🤨
Sep 27, 2021
47
59
18
He was a RINO which is the same as a democrat. Donald Trump was and still is in consultation with Boeing designing something unlike that loser who claimed his POS was in consultation with Boeing.
View attachment 241289
He financed the Republican party....

He could have been part of other party's before... nothing was mentioned in the article I read . But assuming political leaning will bite you in the a.... Or make an a...out of you and me 😳😉😊
 

Robert Mugabe

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2017
9,373
6,374
113
Just saw an interview on CNN which I can't find on line. He was talking gleefully about the 7" thick plexiglass window. He was saying that at full depth it squeezed into the frame by 3/4 of an inch. When it was going to break it would make a crunching noise as shatter patterns spread across the window. He then laughed.

I guess since nobody has pointed it out, when the glass breaks Ocean Gate becomes Water Gate
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Jenesis

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
That's harsh but yet exactly like I feel.

Much more could have been done with 250k to help the ones in needs. Would have made them feel proud. And be alive.
This comment is meaningless.

Much more could be done with the funds required for my trip to the Caribbean..

With the funds for my second massage this week...

with the funds for that dessert I didn't need at the restaurant...

with the funds for that car that was $5,000 more than \I actually needed....
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,481
864
113
Let me rephrase.

They don't pay the % of THEIR income in taxes, that they should be paying, because they have access to tools that most others do not.

So if they did pay the % of their income that they should be paying, who knows, they would probably be paying like 75% of total taxes. Like it should be.
PROOF

I just showed you an article that showed that the top 10% income earners pay 50% of total taxes.

Please show me your research that proves otherwise. I am sure you have many many articles,

J'attend avec impatience votre reponse
 

kittykellykat

Kelly @ Secret Escorts
Jun 15, 2023
295
712
93
This has to be a joke.

You are going down almost 4 kilometers under the sea in a contraption controlled with play station controller?

Right? Saw this video, plus this frame of reference for how far down they were actually going in that contraption:

5E352E9C-3EBC-4981-AAF0-92FFADBBDE3B.jpeg

Those boys never stood a chance of getting back to the surface if something went wrong. As an aside, “more people have been to outer space than to that depth of the ocean” 🤯. That fact alone should’ve been a deterrent to go on this adventure
 

Jubee

Well-known member
May 29, 2016
4,291
1,739
113
Ontario
Right? Saw this video, plus this frame of reference for how far down they were actually going in that contraption:

View attachment 241356

Those boys never stood a chance of getting back to the surface if something went wrong. As an aside, “more people have been to outer space than to that depth of the ocean” 🤯. That fact alone should’ve been a deterrent to go on this adventure
At that depth, the pressure I heard from an expert was the equivalent of a 111 story building made of lead.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts