Canada considering banning Fox News from cable packages

[DinkleMouse]

No, if it was still broadcasted, the US citizens would be FREE to watch it. Unlike Canada where your government controls what people watch.
Does that sound logical coward.
I must say I have learned a lot about why Canada is so fucked up, full of cowards and teetering on communism. Maybe after the country completes the transition it will change the red leaf to yellow. Unfortunately, the United States will probably get there sometime as well, there are way too many people that have children that think like you.

Ah, so what you're saying is that the US is going to dictate what citizens of other countries can watch, but not their own. If that were true, that's not exactly better. But it's not. Some of the reasons they wanted it taken off the air were because it violated it's rules in decency, which are the rules the FCC uses for censorship as per the Fox lawsuit I linked.

But again, the government's own website admits they regulate TV, so all you're doing is digging a deeper hole, Stolen Valour. Especially after you tried to bash on Canada for regulating TV after your baseless assumption that the US doesn't.

I'm also not sure what this has to do with communism. Are you saying right-wing dictators don't attempt to control the media, Stolen Valour?

I'm still waiting on the link to where I said I had a post secondary degree, Stolen Valour, or are you saying you made a baseless accusation there?

It's really unfortunate that you ranted about people making baseless accusations and assumptions in a post where you made two of them. Especially since I'm not letting you get away with pretending you didn't. Maybe go talk to your dad, or those RCMP guys you had drinks with, and see if they can help you figure out where you went wrong.

 

[poker]

No government has the right to control what their citizens read. They do it in China and Russia…..now Canada. BTW, who determines what is hate and misinformation?

Fox was proven to lie about about election results and “facts” they knew to be false. It does not take a rocket scientist to determine that to be hate speech… or understand why it is.

They helped cause a a riotous insurrection at the American Capitol where people lost there lives. A very dangerous right wing organization.

We also don’t air any Russian Propaganda or Chinese State media channels…. for the same reasons.

Maybe someday, they will can be a trusted news organization again… but far more heads would have to roll, and leadership would need to change.

They did this to themselves. Nobody else is to blame here. No guns were held to Tucker’s or Rupert’s heads.

 

[jcpro]

Fox was proven to lie about about election results and “facts” they knew to be false. It does not take a rocket scientist to determine that to be hate speech… or understand why it is.

They helped cause a a riotous insurrection at the American Capitol where people lost there lives. A very dangerous right wing organization.

We also don’t air any Russian Propaganda or Chinese State media channels…. for the same reasons.

Maybe someday, they will can be a trusted news organization again… but far more heads would have to roll, and leadership would need to change.

They did this to themselves. Nobody else is to blame here. No guns were held to Tucker’s or Rupert’s heads.

ROTFLMFAO!!!!

Media’s long con to bury Hunter Biden’s laptop scandal

Journalists were coached on how to shift the discussion away from newsworthy materials detrimental to a specific person (Biden) and focus instead on the means by which they were obtained.

nypost.com

 

[Valcazar]

I kinda wish RAIN was still around, I am curious how he and CD would interact.

 

[Combat dog]

Al-Etejah TV and Al Manar TV off the top of my head. Do you need more, Stolen Valour?

Yeah, I will take your word for it, Coward you cannot even comprehend simple English! Plus, shouldn’t you be more concerned about the royal misfits, than America? It just hit me, Charles and his band of inbred misfits have their chests covered in medals. You must think those were earned? I remember Harry when he played war, some in my unit was assigned to protect him for photo shoots and after they returned from the assignment, Harry was nicknamed prince coward, maybe you’re related!

 

[Valcazar]

Why the fuck is Copypasta Canine going on about the royal family now?

 

[Combat dog]

Need me to quote from it?

"Along with this imagery, viewers were also subjected to a character dressed as Adolf Hitler. As it was impossible to censor enough of this episode to make it acceptable, it was instead banned from being viewed on American TV."

Manu of those were banned because they would never pass government regulation.

But hey, maybe ask the government if they regulate TV.

Obscene, Indecent and Profane Broadcasts

Federal law prohibits obscene, indecent and profane content from being broadcast on the radio or TV.

www.fcc.gov

"Federal law prohibits obscene, indecent and profane content from being broadcast on the radio or TV."

The government agrees: they regulate TV.

Edit: You can also read when Fox sued the FCC over regulation and lost.

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012) - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

So tell us again, Stolen Valour, which countries regulate TV?

I'm still waiting for you to show where I said I had a post graduate degree.

I already acknowledged child porn, if it’s illegal, it cannot be on TV. In simple terms it must be written in law…..like child porn, not a fucking fake news or real news broadcast. You really cannot be that stupid. Now the article one more time my mentally challenged yellow friend. The link you attached referenced 15 shows that were banned in the United States, none indicated do United States government banned the shows. For example, see the attached, it is listed as one of the 15. You specifically quoted the program that reference Adolf Hitler! I even circled it for you. Just so you understand, a dub company is a PRIVATE COMPANY paid to do voice overs. If you you are a sample of an average Canadian, I understand why the government needs to make decisions on your behalf. There you go making assumptions once again.

 

[krealtarron]

Canada is so fucked up, full of cowards and teetering on communism.

Yup we are teetering on communism.

And combat dog is teetering on the verge of insanity.

 

[Combat dog]

Fox was proven to lie about about election results and “facts” they knew to be false. It does not take a rocket scientist to determine that to be hate speech… or understand why it is.

They helped cause a a riotous insurrection at the American Capitol where people lost there lives. A very dangerous right wing organization.

We also don’t air any Russian Propaganda or Chinese State media channels…. for the same reasons.

Maybe someday, they will can be a trusted news organization again… but far more heads would have to roll, and leadership would need to change.

They did this to themselves. Nobody else is to blame here. No guns were held to Tucker’s or Rupert’s heads.

Canada evidently needs to control what its society hears and sees, because after reading some of these posts, it is evident that a good portion of the population believes the first thing they hear or see, and cannot think for themselves. Propaganda does not need to be spoken or seen, it can be from information withheld. Nancy Pelosi referred to it as an insurrection to get stupid peoples attention, and it took off. The entire thing was politically motivated and I am not talking about the protesters. It is the only time I have ever heard of a policeman, killing an unarmed woman for climbing through a window. The cop got away with it, because he is black, and she is white. In the United States for a police officer to use deadly force, they must articulate with specific articulable facts why they were afraid for their life or great bodily injury. Pelosi covered up the murder, and one day she will rot in hell.

 

[krealtarron]

It is the only time I have ever heard of a policeman, killing an unarmed woman for climbing through a window. The cop got away with it, because he is black, and she is white.

If a white guy tried to climb the said "window", then a white cop would have shot him under the same circumstances. No politics there. Infact I think the police were very restrained. Restraint that they normally dont show with black people. Must have been because the majority of protestors were white.

 

[Valcazar]

Man, the reality Battle Puppy lives in is a pretty wild one.
I wonder what the color of the sky is there?

 

[johnd5050]

No government has the right to control what their citizens read. They do it in China and Russia…..now Canada. BTW, who determines what is hate and misinformation?

Members on this esteemed board called TERB

 

[Frankfooter]

I already acknowledged child porn, if it’s illegal, it cannot be on TV. In simple terms it must be written in law…..like child porn, not a fucking fake news or real news broadcast. You really cannot be that stupid. Now the article one more time my mentally challenged yellow friend. The link you attached referenced 15 shows that were banned in the United States, none indicated do United States government banned the shows. For example, see the attached, it is listed as one of the 15. You specifically quoted the program that reference Adolf Hitler! I even circled it for you. Just so you understand, a dub company is a PRIVATE COMPANY paid to do voice overs. If you you are a sample of an average Canadian, I understand why the government needs to make decisions on your behalf. There you go making assumptions once again.

I'm trying to figure out if these posts are from a bot or AI or a non English speaker using AI translation.
Except for the screen grabs I'd say its AI translation/replies.
Things like 'kitty porn' earlier.

But not someone who is first language is English.

 

[Leimonis]

Canada evidently needs to control what its society hears and sees, because after reading some of these posts, it is evident that a good portion of the population believes the first thing they hear or see, and cannot think for themselves. Propaganda does not need to be spoken or seen, it can be from information withheld. Nancy Pelosi referred to it as an insurrection to get stupid peoples attention, and it took off. The entire thing was politically motivated and I am not talking about the protesters. It is the only time I have ever heard of a policeman, killing an unarmed woman for climbing through a window. The cop got away with it, because he is black, and she is white. In the United States for a police officer to use deadly force, they must articulate with specific articulable facts why they were afraid for their life or great bodily injury. Pelosi covered up the murder, and one day she will rot in hell.

I’m a little confused. So a cop is guarding the premises and an intruder with an unruly mob behind her is climbing through the window. A cop raises his weapon and commands her to stop. She does not obey. What exactly is he supposed to do? Pelosi Schmelosi is he allowed to stand his ground or not?

 

[DinkleMouse]

I already acknowledged child porn, if it’s illegal, it cannot be on TV.

Oh, So you admit the US government regulates what's on TV, Stolen Valour? So regulating some things is ok and doesn't make you "communist" (as if Communists where the only ones that operated propaganda), only if things you don't think should be regulated are regulated. Got it. At least we know what your standard is. Regulation isn't bad, unless the regulator is forbidding something you don't agree with. Have I got that right, Stolen Valour? You're the arbiter of what regulation is perfectly fine and what makes a country equivalent to North Korea?

But let's be clear: the FCC doesn't limit its rules to what's illegal, despite what you imply in your post.

The FCC and Speech

The FCC is barred by law from trying to prevent the broadcast of any point of view. The Communications Act prohibits the FCC from censoring broadcast material, in most cases, and from making any regulation that would interfere with freedom of speech.

www.fcc.gov

The FCC does impose certain restraints and obligations on broadcasters. Speech regulations are confined to specific topics, which usually have been identified by Congress through legislation or adopted by the FCC through full notice-and-comment rulemaking or adjudicatory proceedings. These topics include:

• indecency,
• obscenity,
• sponsorship identification,
• conduct of on-air contests,
• hoaxes,
• commercial content in children's TV programming,
• broadcast news distortion,
• accessibility to emergency information on television, and
• inappropriate use of Emergency Alert System warning tones for entertainment or other non-emergency purposes.

I even circled it for you. Just so you understand, a dub company is a PRIVATE COMPANY paid to do voice overs. If you you are a sample of an average Canadian, I understand why the government needs to make decisions on your behalf.

When a note says that something didn't pass the company's censors, what it's usually saying is that it did not comply with the regulator. If the company just felt it wasn't appropriate for it's brand, then it wouldn't show it at all. When a company shows it in every other country except the US but says it didn't pass the censors, they're saying they would've gotten in trouble if they showed it in the US. Or do you think company's just hate money? C'mon Stolen Valour, are you really that thick?

There you go making assumptions once again.

Says the guys who initially said the US didn't regulate what was on TV and then to go back and editted his post to add kiddie porn was banned to pretend like he didn't make an assinine statement. Still waiting on you to clear up that assumption you made about me claiming to have a post secondary degree. Did you find where I said that yet, Stolen Valour? Maybe your RCMP drinking buddies who "monitor" threads can help you find it.

 

[DinkleMouse]

I'm trying to figure out if these posts are from a bot or AI or a non English speaker using AI translation.
Except for the screen grabs I'd say its AI translation/replies.
Things like 'kitty porn' earlier.

But not someone who is first language is English.

Hey hey hey! Stolen Valour is a very intelligent man! He's one of only 8 Regimental Commanders that have ever existed in the history of MARSOC! He spent 6 out of his 8 years in special forces in combat, but to be Regitmental Commander he still had to go to Staff College so I'm sure he's very well educated!

We're probably just too dumb to realize what he meant. No wait, not dumb: we're just cowards, that's it. Have it got it all right, Stolen Valour?

 

[Knuckle Ball]

Oh, So you admit the US government regulates what's on TV, Stolen Valour? So regulating some things is ok and doesn't make you "communist" (as if Communists where the only ones that operated propaganda), only if things you don't think should be regulated are regulated. Got it. At least we know what your standard is. Regulation isn't bad, unless the regulator is forbidding something you don't agree with. Have I got that right, Stolen Valour? You're the arbiter of what regulation is perfectly fine and what makes a country equivalent to North Korea?

But let's be clear: the FCC doesn't limit its rules to what's illegal, despite what you imply in your post.

The FCC and Speech

The FCC is barred by law from trying to prevent the broadcast of any point of view. The Communications Act prohibits the FCC from censoring broadcast material, in most cases, and from making any regulation that would interfere with freedom of speech.

www.fcc.gov

The FCC does impose certain restraints and obligations on broadcasters. Speech regulations are confined to specific topics, which usually have been identified by Congress through legislation or adopted by the FCC through full notice-and-comment rulemaking or adjudicatory proceedings. These topics include:

• indecency,
• obscenity,
• sponsorship identification,
• conduct of on-air contests,
• hoaxes,
• commercial content in children's TV programming,
• broadcast news distortion,
• accessibility to emergency information on television, and
• inappropriate use of Emergency Alert System warning tones for entertainment or other non-emergency purposes.

When a note says that something didn't pass the company's censors, what it's usually saying is that it did not comply with the regulator. If the company just felt it wasn't appropriate for it's brand, then it wouldn't show it at all. When a company shows it in every other country except the US but says it didn't pass the censors, they're saying they would've gotten in trouble if they showed it in the US. Or do you think company's just hate money? C'mon Stolen Valour, are you really that thick?



Says the guys who initially said the US didn't regulate what was on TV and then to go back and editted his post to add kiddie pretend was banned to pretend like he didn't make an assinine statement. Still waiting on you to clear up that assumption you made about me claiming to have a list secondary degree. Did you find where I said that yet, Stolen Valour? Maybe your RCMP drinking buddies who "monitor" threads can help you find it.

Piddle Puppy just got served.

 

[Combat dog]

Hey hey hey! Stolen Valour is a very intelligent man! He's one of only 8 Regimental Commanders that have ever existed in the history of MARSOC! He spent 6 out of his 8 years in special forces in combat, but to be Regitmental Commander he still had to go to Staff College so I'm sure he's very well educated!

We're probably just too dumb to realize what he meant. No wait, not dumb: we're just cowards, that's it. Have it got it all right, Stolen Valour?

See that is the problem, you assume….I never wrote all my combat time was in the military. Short story, a person that is only trained to kill people does not have exactly many job opportunities in the civilian world. Therefore, many of us go to what you might say is called the dark side, we become very well paid security contractors that governments like canada and others, including the US, pay to perform duties that will give plausible deniability, or the countries just don’t have the skill set. For example, Prince Coward was not protected by his normal security team, because the team did not have experience in a war zone. When I was in the military a FNG (google it) showed up after completion of basic MARSOC training. Although he had no real experience in combat, he thought he knew everything, so much so, he was nicknamed popper. He would always pop off. Unfortunately, his head was blown off. You remind me of him, you pop off without knowing the subject matter and assume things that are not fact. Please do the world a favor and don’t have kids, your DNA has a retarded gene.

 

[krealtarron]

what you might say is called the dark side

canada and others, including the US, pay to perform duties that will give plausible deniability, or the countries just don’t have the skill set.

 

[Leimonis]

See that is the problem, you assume….I never wrote all my combat time was in the military. Short story, a person that is only trained to kill people does not have exactly many job opportunities in the civilian world. Therefore, many of us go to what you might say is called the dark side, we become very well paid security contractors that governments like canada and others, including the US, pay to perform duties that will give plausible deniability, or the countries just don’t have the skill set. For example, Prince Coward was not protected by his normal security team, because the team did not have experience in a war zone. When I was in the military a FNG (google it) showed up after completion of basic MARSOC training. Although he had no real experience in combat, he thought he knew everything, so much so, he was nicknamed popper. He would always pop off. Unfortunately, his head was blown off. You remind me of him, you pop off without knowing the subject matter and assume things that are not fact. Please do the world a favor and don’t have kids, your DNA has a retarded gene.

You remind me of George Santos, he also had a complicated past