School shooting in Nashville

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,546
15,084
113
ROTFLMFAO!!!! I've discovered homophobia when you and Tucker were still in diapers.
Did you make a boo-boo and meant to write Trannies? I'm not judging, just trying to make sure you were not in a hurry when you wrote the post.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,423
6,690
113
This thread has to be the first thread on a shooting that the conservative minded and far-right types have made sure to keep posting in instead of praying the thread just goes away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
Is that Megyn Kelly interviewing Glenn Grunwald - 2 grifters who have built a career around ultra right ranting?! :unsure: 🐸 😼 😹 ;)
A good rule of thumb that works better than average: when they shoot the messenger, the message is usually right on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danmand

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
  • Like
Reactions: mitchell76

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,484
4,902
113
A good rule of thumb that works better than average: when they shoot the messenger, the message is usually right on.
that rule has definitely proven itself on Terb.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,103
86,426
113
A good rule of thumb that works better than average: when they shoot the messenger, the message is usually right on.
That's not a rule of thumb, JC. That's a rule of dumb.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,103
86,426
113
Breitbart, huh?..... I'm going to break your rule and laugh at Breitbart for being a notorious shitrag bullshit site.

I'm skeptical about anything from Brietbart. But assuming what they post was true, why the fuck should you get to read the demented ramblings of a mass killer anyway?!

Last time I checked, the media had their own "rule of thumb" that mass murderers' psychotic ramblings weren't published because random gun violence killers are driven by desire for public attention. Of course, Breitbard - being spew - would break the rule anyway, if they had a chance.
 

mitchell76

Well-known member
Aug 10, 2010
21,754
8,251
113
Breitbart, huh?..... I'm going to break your rule and laugh at Breitbart for being a notorious shitrag bullshit site.

I'm skeptical about anything from Brietbart. But assuming what they post was true, why the fuck should you get to read the demented ramblings of a mass killer anyway?!

Last time I checked, the media had their own "rule of thumb" that mass murderers' psychotic ramblings weren't published because random gun violence killers are driven by desire for public attention. Of course, Breitbard - being spew - would break the rule anyway, if they had a chance.
Why doesn't Biden produce the Manifesto already?? What are the Dems hiding??
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
That's not a rule of thumb, JC. That's a rule of dumb.
Breitbart, huh?..... I'm going to break your rule and laugh at Breitbart for being a notorious shitrag bullshit site.

I'm skeptical about anything from Brietbart. But assuming what they post was true, why the fuck should you get to read the demented ramblings of a mass killer anyway?!

Last time I checked, the media had their own "rule of thumb" that mass murderers' psychotic ramblings weren't published because random gun violence killers are driven by desire for public attention. Of course, Breitbard - being spew - would break the rule anyway, if they had a chance.
And the rule strikes, again. LOL!!
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,484
4,902
113

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
You do se it?
Nah, he's just afraid of the content of the murderer 's writings. And no matter what we find out, he'll try to defend it. Them ideologues stick together.
 
Toronto Escorts