Read the link attached to my post #294. The experts seem to think it's not as simple as you make out.The past 200,000 years of human history isn't enough material for you?
Puberty blockers slow growth on teens, its a competitive disadvantage.The women that have to compete again them, I guess.
BS, unscientific BS, wishful thinking BS.Puberty blockers slow growth on teens, its a competitive disadvantage.
If you cared.
For sure.Puberty blockers slow growth on teens, its a competitive disadvantage.
If you cared.
What the feck do you think puberty blockers do?BS, unscientific BS, wishful thinking BS.
Children DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE PROFESSIONAL SPORTS.What the feck do you think puberty blockers do?
They stop puberty and the growth spurt that follows.
Which means trans girls are at a competitive disadvantage.
This whole argument is an incredibly moronic attack on an already targeted, tiny, minority.
puberty blockers don't put trans at a competitive disadvantage...where the hell did you learn that? if anything, it just delays their development but it doesn't put them in the same level as biological females....have nothing against trans, they are individuals but they don't belong in female competitive sports, they should have their own category...What the feck do you think puberty blockers do?
They stop puberty and the growth spurt that follows.
Which means trans girls are at a competitive disadvantage.
This whole argument is an incredibly moronic attack on an already targeted, tiny, minority.
The article is ridiculous.Read the link attached to my post #294. The experts seem to think it's not as simple as you make out.
So read it and then we can discuss it. You're going to refuse of course.
Because it's not about reality, science, hundreds of thousands of years of evolution. It's about politics and ideology. The lefties really belive that nature and biology can be done away with wishful thinking. I've seen that often enough in practice behind the Iron Curtain. It will fail as it always has.How many 15 year-old male soccer teams have to beat women's national teams for you to understand this fundamental concept?
This factual reality alone should say it all.
Read the link attached to my post #294. The experts seem to think it's not as simple as you make out.
OTOH, he IS a doctor. And you're just an angry dude with a fixation on this topic.The article is ridiculous.
It starts out stating that transgirls have no advantage over cisgirls. These are children... everyone knows that girls may be stronger than prepubescent boys.
Then it argues that no trans athletes have qualified for the Olympics even though the Olympics have had trans-inclusive policies since 2004. So what? Trans are a fraction of a percent of the population.
It goes on to illustrate that testosterone is negligible in athletic performance and that 10% of women have high testosterone. So what... they're women, and the impact of testosterone occurs during puberty.
The author provides another non-argument stating that enforcing bans will be difficult because hermaphrodites exist so they have no clearcut team to play on.
Then he says that having a separate category for trans to compete in is unjust, even though it is both a just and viable solution. He says "separate but equal" doesn't work because women's sports show us that they receive less sponsorships LOL. That's the point... women receive fewer sponsorships because they cannot perform at the same physical level as men, and therefore their sports tend to be less exciting and draw significantly smaller audiences.
The author is Jack Turban . Is he trans?
ALL of human history and merely opening your eyes and observing the world tells you in no uncertain terms that men are SUPERIOR physical athletes compared to women. Do NOT mix the two.
How many 15 year-old male soccer teams have to beat women's national teams for you to understand this fundamental concept?
The notion of transgender girls having an unfair advantage comes from the idea that testosterone causes physical changes such as an increase in muscle mass. But transgender girls are not the only girls with high testosterone levels. An estimated 10 percent of women have polycystic ovarian syndrome, which results in elevated testosterone levels. They are not banned from female sports. Transgender girls on puberty blockers, on the other hand, have negligible testosterone levels. Yet these state bills would force them to play with the boys. Plus, the athletic advantage conferred by testosterone is equivocal. As Katrina Karkazis, a senior visiting fellow and expert on testosterone and bioethics at Yale University explains, “Studies of testosterone levels in athletes do not show any clear, consistent relationship between testosterone and athletic performance. Sometimes testosterone is associated with better performance, but other studies show weak links or no links. And yet others show testosterone is associated with worse performance.” The bills’ premises lack scientific validity.The article is ridiculous.
It starts out stating that transgirls have no advantage over cisgirls. These are children... everyone knows that girls may be stronger than prepubescent boys.
Then it argues that no trans athletes have qualified for the Olympics even though the Olympics have had trans-inclusive policies since 2004. So what? Trans are a fraction of a percent of the population.
It goes on to illustrate that testosterone is negligible in athletic performance and that 10% of women have high testosterone. So what... they're women, and the impact of testosterone occurs during puberty.
The author provides another non-argument stating that enforcing bans will be difficult because hermaphrodites exist so they have no clearcut team to play on.
Then he says that having a separate category for trans to compete in is unjust, even though it is both a just and viable solution. He says "separate but equal" doesn't work because women's sports show us that they receive less sponsorships LOL. That's the point... women receive fewer sponsorships because they cannot perform at the same physical level as men, and therefore their sports tend to be less exciting and draw significantly smaller audiences.
The author is Jack Turban . Is he trans?
ALL of human history and merely opening your eyes and observing the world tells you in no uncertain terms that men are SUPERIOR physical athletes compared to women. Do NOT mix the two.
How many 15 year-old male soccer teams have to beat women's national teams for you to understand this fundamental concept?
No.Because it's not about reality, science, hundreds of thousands of years of evolution. It's about politics and ideology. The lefties really belive that nature and biology can be done away with wishful thinking. I've seen that often enough in practice behind the Iron Curtain. It will fail as it always has.
Wait, now you're saying this isn't about children at all and its about pro sports leagues?Children DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE PROFESSIONAL SPORTS.
ROTFLMFAO!!! This is not about "trans inclusion ". It's about suspension of reason, science in the name of idiotic ideology.No.
And it's not "lefties". This is a game you guys play. You take a mainstream position that you dislike - i.e. gun control, trans inclusion, whatever - and call it "extremist leftie communist marxist tyranny takeover". In fact, "pronouns" are used by most Tory Ontario civil servants. And the Olympics have been trans inclusive for 20 years.
These are mainstream bodies, not Che Guevara.
And I just cited you some science. And the science says you're full of shit. So go find me some other science and we'll chat more.
That is a good summary of your views.ROTFLMFAO!!! This is not about "trans inclusion ". It's about suspension of reason, science in the name of idiotic ideology.
ROTFLMFAO!!! I'm not the one arguing against the settled biological consensus.That is a good summary of your views.