healthcare, housing are inter-related to immigration independent of your preference to avoid the topics
injecting them into the discussion is not free license for you to call anyone a raciest
Million Immigrants in 2022 - Thanks Fidel
- Thread starter Rose11
- Start date
injecting them into the discussion is not free license for you to call anyone a raciest
I will not debate those topics with someone who injected race into the topic by calling me anti-white.
but your objectives are social engineering
it is the reason you are rejecting sound economic policy
the only other excuse is ... blunt stupidity
Right wing policies have made it more expensive to have kids.
So now people have less kids.
Which means we need more immigrants.
What's your answer?
More right wing policy..
you do not get to pick and choose discussion topics
you get to
1. run away
2. put him on ignore (run away in reality)
3. realize healthcare, housing are inter-related to immigration independent of your preference to avoid the topics & defend your desire of 10 miilion immigrants in the context of healthcare, housing
the facts just keep mounting up against your ideologically driven position
again try applying logic /facts/ sound judgement before allowing your ideology to
it is the reality of your indefensible position
your objectives are social engineering
it is the reason you are rejecting sound economic policy
the only other excuse is ... blunt stupidity
I get to pick and choose what topics I debate and with whom I debate them. I do not owe any responses to racists other than to dismiss them entirely.
Last edited:
It is your accusation, not my insinuation.
What you consider "sound economic policy" is in reality a self contradicting argument that both argues for and against using the same fact.
Its social engineering to allow the demographics to change without immigration as well.
Its just you won't have anyone to keep paying your old age pension.
again, i do not care what specifics you asked for, you question was addressed
WTF 53& of Canadian small and medium business is not vague
it is more than half n
any rational person would agree 53& of Canadian small and medium business willing to forgo investment because of a skilled labor shortage is a problem
ot even a vague problem , it is a problem for our economy
the ones in demand by Canadian small and medium business
53%of Canadian small and medium business
all of immigrants coming here without a job offer in place apparently do not have the required skills... or they would have a job offer
you really need to start thinking for yourself soon
.
all of immigrants coming here without a job offer in place apparently do not have the required skills... or they would have a job offer
the facts just keep mounting up against your ideologically driven position
again try applying logic /facts/ sound judgement before allowing your ideology to
if you are unwilling to refute the claims that higher immigration is exacerbating our housing shortage and strain our already strained health care system, then the facts stand on face value
higher immigration is exacerbating our housing shortage and strain our already strained health care system
both sound arguments for dialing back immigration and increasing the importance of having a job offer as an acceptance criteria
the facts just keep mounting up against your ideologically driven position
again try applying logic /facts/ sound judgement before allowing your ideology to
You are not understanding the question. 53% of Canadian small and medium business means what? What are the specific positions that are short staffed?
For example, lets take a restaurant. What is the position in a restaurant that is short staffed? Is it shortage of chefs? Bus boys? Restaurant managers?
Which of these and how many of these positions are short staffed? Of the 1M immigrants, how many of them have these necessary skills and aren't taking up jobs in these positions?
Unless you can answer that, you do not have the data to make an assertion.
That is an incredibly stupid statement to make.
Canadian employers DO NOT, and I repeat DO NOT, interview or give offers to people who are not PHYSICALLY PRESENT in Canada. It DOES NOT happen.
Immigrants will come here, apply, interview and get jobs. So a job offer pre-requisite is neither necessary nor makes any sense.
I have one more question:
What if an immigrant comes here with a necessary skill to fill one of the short staffed jobs, but simply decides to do something else? You know free country and all?
So out of the 1M immigrants how many decided to switch careers? Give me specific numbers.
I will repeat.
I get to pick and choose what topics I debate and with whom I debate them. I do not owe any responses to racists other than to dismiss them entirely.
PS: You are responding to my response to another person. Lets keep our discussion to only one thread.
sure i did, it is your attempt to avoid the facts
it means more than half of Canadian small and medium business are forgoing investment because of skilled labor shortages
Canadian small and medium business represent the majority of job creation in this country
So it means it a real problem
lets not and settle on 53% of Canadian small and medium business
enough otherwise there would not be a skilled labor shortage
sure i do
more than half of Canadian small and medium business are forgoing investment because of skilled labor shortages
Canadian small and medium business represent the majority of job creation in this country
That is an incredibly stupid statement to make.
we have already fixed you of this confusion
international job placement agencies in canada - Google Search
nope, one can apply for positions all over the globe
his/ her choice
however if he / she rejects a job offer to fill one of the short skilled staffed jobs then its the back of the line
& allow a different highly skilled immigrant apply for that position
if he/ she has the right skill set that enables them to acquired multiple job offers, all the power to them
but we both know the vast majority of the million did not receive any job offer , otherwise there would not be a skilled labor shortage
my guess is most did not apply & defaulted to your worn out excuses
Canada is offering an opportunity of a lifetime, to become a Canadian citizen ... all that required is a job offer
not enough to satisfy the skilled positions needed by 53% of Canadian small and medium business
maybe a better question is out of the 1MM immigrants how many are working?
And how many of the 1MM immigrants are making more / less than the national average salary ?
And how many are of the 1MM immigrants paying more / less than the national average in taxes?
Give me specific numbers or realize how god damn foolish you have been
we do know that of the 1MM immigrants lots want housing & all will need health care
the facts just keep mounting up against your ideologically driven position
again try applying logic /facts/ sound judgement before allowing your ideology to
Last edited:
hmm you request has been noted and after careful consideration... rejected
do not dictate terms to me
WTF is wrong with you
if you are unwilling to refute the claims that higher immigration is exacerbating our housing shortage and strain our already strained health care system, then the facts stand on face value
higher immigration is exacerbating our housing shortage and strain our already strained health care system
both sound arguments for dialing back immigration and increasing the importance of having a job offer as an acceptance criteria
the facts just keep mounting up against your ideologically driven position
again try applying logic /facts/ sound judgement before allowing your ideology to
I am not debating this topic with you as you responded to my response to someone else.
Got it so you dont have any data to support your assertion and you were talking out of your ass (as usual).
Unless you have data with the specificity I asked for, your claim holds no water and you simply belong in the same trash bucket as simp. He uses "housing and healthcare" as a cover. You use "job offer" as a cover. When in reality your actual and only real issue is with the skin colour of the immigrants. Hence why you decided to immediately jump on the "you are trying to socially engineer" bandwagon.
Oh and by the way, you never want to go for those "international placement agencies". They are mostly immigration fraud. And no, no respectable employer will give someone who isn't physically present in Canada, who does not have immigration status in Canada a job.
what in the world is wrong with you ?
Are you stating this to be untrue?
this is a real world problem and it has real significant detrimental impacts on our productivity and economic growth ./ stability
you do not get to ignore it, simply because you did not specifically ask for it
what in the world is wrong with you ?
what in the world is wrong with you ?
i do not care what you specifically asked for >>> go get it yourself
i have proven we have a skilled labor shortage which current increased immigration has not addressed
provide data which refutes this or admit you are wrong about this as well
housing health care are real world issues & a job offer is confirmation of targeted policy criteria
like a child, you dismiss what you do not like.
As usual the loonie left play the race card when they are losing an argument
bull shit,
pure rhetoric
people get placed to international positions all the time
bull shit,
initial interviews can be conducted via video teleconference, followed up by a trip to Canada for an in person interview
if the candidate is the right fit the company will cover the cost of the trip
you seemed very confused about the value that is being offered here
it is an exceptional privilege to be offered Canadian Citizenship
It is not a given right
and all that is being asked is a job offer
the facts just keep mounting up against your ideologically driven position
again try applying logic /facts/ sound judgement before allowing your ideology to
Last edited:
you do not get to select the issues
do not dictate terms to me
WTF is wrong with you
if you are unwilling to refute the claims that higher immigration is exacerbating our housing shortage and straining our already strained health care system, then the facts stand on face value
higher immigration is exacerbating our housing shortage and straining our already strained health care system
both sound arguments for dialing back immigration and increasing the importance of having a job offer as an acceptance criteria
the facts just keep mounting up against your ideologically driven position
again try applying logic /facts/ sound judgement before allowing your ideology to
Last edited:
