Exactly, either way he's full of shit.you really believe he read those books? LoL
Exactly, either way he's full of shit.you really believe he read those books? LoL
First… let’s define “they” in your sentence. Who do you believe “they” are? Librarians? Censors who somehow have the power to change books? Or the rights holders who decided to modernize their product?Why should 8-11 yr old kids be exposed to these type of books?? Also the librarian said, she had more explicit books behind her desk, if the 11 yr old kid was interested---LOL Yet they choose to ban some words in James Bond books. Makes no sense to me!!
I read them when I was 9 or 10. That's when they were current. I was too mature for them at that age though.you really believe he read those books? LoL
You're really adept at mis-reading posts, huh?So, you want to pick and choose which mediums to censor?
I love the way you and Mello rally to the cause of defending the "artistic integrity" of trash pulp thrillers written 60 years ago. Like I said, if we were talking about Phillip Roth or Norman Mailer, I'd support them not being bowdlerized. Fleming is not worth the effort.you really believe he read those books? LoL
Why did you keep reading those trashy novels already knowing they were shit, racist and crude? Give us a peep into that dark and perverted mind of yours.I love the way you and Mello rally to the cause of defending the "artistic integrity" of trash pulp thrillers written 60 years ago. Like I said, if we were talking about Phillip Roth or Norman Mailer, I'd support them not being bowdlerized. Fleming is not worth the effort.
You stalwarts know who Roth and Mailer were and what "bowdlerized" means, huh?.... You're both literary types of course.
Mailer and Roth? I jerked off to both of those guys' dirty books. But I have my literary standards in what I jerk off to, Mello. You're probably more into Burroughs though.Why did you keep reading those trashy novels already knowing they were shit, racist and crude? Give us peep into that dark and perverted mind of yours.
I'm not gonna lie to you...not the literary genius...i have limited resources for that somehow growing up in 3rd world country...I just don't think you're as savvy either...I love the way you and Mello rally to the cause of defending the "artistic integrity" of trash pulp thrillers written 60 years ago. Like I said, if we were talking about Phillip Roth or Norman Mailer, I'd support them not being bowdlerized. Fleming is not worth the effort.
You stalwarts know who Roth and Mailer were and what "bowdlerized" means, huh?.... You're both literary types of course.
Mailer and Roth? I jerked off to both of those guys' dirty books. But I have my literary standards in what I jerk off to, Mello. You're probably more into Burroughs though.
He's savvy enough to distract from answering real questions here and in other threads, just not savvy enough to realize how conspicuous he is. I guess that would make him somewhat savvy and totally shameless.I'm not gonna lie to you...not the literary genius...i have limited resources for that somehow growing up in 3rd world country...I just don't think you're as savvy either...
Ah.....The Nazi default position.The Germans got rid of all their Nazi statues, flags, etc. after WWII; now it’s the US with a Nazi problem.
The poster you refer to is a very resentful individual without a modicum class. I've found ignoring his diatribes to be beneficial.He's savvy enough to distract from answering real questions here and in other threads, just not savvy enough to realize how conspicuous he is. I guess that would make him somewhat savvy and totally shameless.
IMHO, "they", are the woke left. The same censors who forced the Cleveland Indians MLB team to become the Cleveland Guardians. Also, who forced the Washington Redskins NFL team, to become the Washington Commanders.First… let’s define “they” in your sentence. Who do you believe “they” are? Librarians? Censors who somehow have the power to change books? Or the rights holders who decided to modernize their product?
Yes. You are clearly familiar with it.Ah.....The Nazi default position.
But they didn't get rid of Mein Kamph. The point being it was written by one of the worst ever birthed to this world. And its still relevant.The Germans got rid of all their Nazi statues, flags, etc. after WWII; now it’s the US with a Nazi problem.
They should change the Montreal Canadiens to the Montreal Quebecers because they don't really want to be Canadians.IMHO, "they", are the woke left. The same censors who forced the Cleveland Indians MLB team to become the Cleveland Guardians. Also, who forced the Washington Redskins NFL team, to become the Washington Commanders.
Damn right, how about the Always Super Bowl Half Time Show.IMHO, "they", are the woke left. The same censors who forced the Cleveland Indians MLB team to become the Cleveland Guardians. Also, who forced the Washington Redskins NFL team, to become the Washington Commanders.
Sure. The point I am making is that the Germans seem very capable of “remembering their history” even after tearing down all the Nazi flags and monuments.But they didn't get rid of Mein Kamph. The point being it was written by one of the worst ever birthed to this world. And its still relevant.
Well said.The Bond books, and even the first films, contains racism and misogyny. Because thats what happened in the 50's not just in the USA but around the world. It is a document showing the casual British post war colonial attitude was still quite alive.
To Kill a Mockingbird has already been banned in some US school districts.I fear one day books like To Kill a Mockingbird will be banned or changed, losing their purpose in the drive to create a sanitized world.
The best argument against Mein Kamph is to actually read Mein Kamph. Fuck that book is boring cringe. I actually made it only a 1/3 of the way through before I gave up. Much like the bible actually for the same reasons.But they didn't get rid of Mein Kamph. The point being it was written by one of the worst ever birthed to this world. And its still relevant.
Believe it or not, To Kill a Mockingbird is banned in Brampton, I a parent didn't like the language in the book including the use of the N word and had it removed from the curriculum.To Kill a Mockingbird has already been banned in some US school districts.