ThanksYou can try reading. The whole discipline case is public and JP posted (some of or all of) the correspondence.
I have read it... many of the of the complaints are rather weak.
ThanksYou can try reading. The whole discipline case is public and JP posted (some of or all of) the correspondence.
The CPO clearly disagrees.Thanks
I have read it... many of the of the complaints are rather weak.
Stoic is not how anyone would define Petersen. Ridiculous.Stoic men seem to be an issue with you knuckle ball. what is your problem with stoic men?
The four virtues of stoicism.
Spoken like a mangina.Stoic is not how anyone would define Petersen. Ridiculous.
Maybe I am a mangina.Spoken like a mangina.
Right.The CPO clearly disagrees.
Well no, but then Peterson doesn't live up to most of his 12 rules, either.Stoic is not how anyone would define Petersen. Ridiculous.
It's Resetset.The guy who is telling others not to post in an echo chamber thread is the same guy who is calling people Manginas in the same thread. WTF.
He was suffering from Akathisia as a result of a paradoxical reaction to the benzodiazepine clonazepam.The CPO clearly disagrees.
The fact that Peterson basically gave the CPO investigators the middle finger and told them that he was not going to waste his time responding to these complaints probably didn’t help him, either.
Peterson’s arrogance always winds up getting him into trouble…but it simultaneously fuels him to be this way. Just like he insisted on having himself put into a medically induced coma to treat his barbiturate addiction- no reputable physician in North America would do it because it would be malpractice so he goes to some “clinic” in Eastern Europe to have this done. Like seriously…the man takes everything to it’s most extreme.
Now why does it occur to me that you have never read his 12 rules or have any knowledgeWell no, but then Peterson doesn't live up to most of his 12 rules, either.
You can be generous and frame that as "I struggle with this as well, so let us try and be better and strive for this together" rather than "I am a hypocritical joke".
My impression is that this "I, too, am just a sinner in the hands of an angry god" framing is sort of how he views himself.
That's just an impression though, I wouldn't hang too much on it.
Actually most of the time he is.........Stoic is not how anyone would define Petersen. Ridiculous.
He is actually the emotional type. Not stoic at all.Actually most of the time he is.........
Given how wrong you are, I can only assume it is personal or partisan bias.Now why does it occur to me that you have never read his 12 rules or have any knowledge
of what they include,lol.
To be fair, the modern use of the word "stoic" isn't the same as the traditional philosophical school.He is actually the emotional type. Not stoic at all.
He is actually the emotional type. Not stoic at all.
He is angry, than crying, most of the times. Thats why he is emotional.
Classic Dr. Peterson at Oxford....Watch it at your peril.....Is this what the left calls misogynistic?
And I know you're going to find some clips where he is crying but they are a small scintilla of his interviews or videos.
You are correct. I have read his last two books and can confirm he lives up to all of his rules.Given how wrong you are, I can only assume it is personal or partisan bias.
There's that word again.....When on the attack....Default to calling your foe a ''grifter''.He is angry, than crying, most of the times. Thats why he is emotional.
I dont care much about JP. Some of what he says is okay. I just consider him a grifter.
Tate on the other hand.....