Mirage Escorts

Oakville teacher wears huge prosthetic breasts to shop class

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
Chikdren don't have the mental maturity to make these decisions on their own. So yeah. G.R.O.O.M.E.D.
The chances of a counsellor making those decisions are only slightly above zero.
At worst the counsellor enabled a kid to help deal with choices they had already made, which is not grooming.
Grooming implies that the kid was straight and the counsellor turned them trans in a series of meetings, which is utterly ridiculous.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,546
88,202
113
Yes it is. We're talking about 6-year old kids

Phil, what if those flags were Canadian flags?

Wouldn't those emblems also represent a set of abstract values? And wouldn't carrying them also be "grooming"?

Everything you learn in school - assuming you learned anything, I guess - is "grooming" because all schools inculcate a value system. The question is whether you like the values inculcated. If you went to a Madrassa in Saudi, you would probably be pissed off. But the civic values section of Canadian primary education is also arbitrary.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,866
22,266
113
If those kids were holding MAGA hats instead of rainbow flags woke comrades would be screening that the kids are being manipulated. :)
But you have no problem with kids holding MAGA hats and guns, do you?
That kind of grooming is ok for you?

This is a very creepy post
Do you think kids younger than 16 don't masturbate, talk or have sex with each other?

Its not only kids, there are lots of people who are getting 'groomed' by incel top g types.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,528
6,735
113
More like LGBTQ agenda to tell underage kids they can make life altering decisions, be counseled by unqualified people,
...
Where? What case are you talking about where counselled into making life altering decisions? The OP case is a kid being advised to wear a shape concealing clothing instead of suggesting surgery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,528
6,735
113
That's the spirit Mr. Bunker.
I guess if kids are "capable" we should let them enter legally binding contracts, have sex with adults if they consent, vote, let them leave school
if they choose, allow unfettered access to porn, join the military, that kind of thing, do you agree?
Amazing how you keep avoiding what our laws actually say. Kids can legally make decisions about their physical and mental wellbeing as long as the profession believes them capable of understanding the choice.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,528
6,735
113
These parents put it very well. It's not a matter of LGBTQ rights or transphobia. It's about what this guy is projecting and skewing as his "rights".
...
According to Halton's policy he/she does have that right. Parents don't have the right to complain because they don't like it. If they don't like it they can lobby their trustee and get the rules changed, you know, democracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,700
60,776
113
Phil, what if those flags were Canadian flags?

Wouldn't those emblems also represent a set of abstract values? And wouldn't carrying them also be "grooming"?

Everything you learn in school - assuming you learned anything, I guess - is "grooming" because all schools inculcate a value system. The question is whether you like the values inculcated. If you went to a Madrassa in Saudi, you would probably be pissed off. But the civic values section of Canadian primary education is also arbitrary.
Yes, that is the point of Rufo trying to reframe what "grooming" means.
If you actually thought his reframe was sincere, then really anything that teaches anything to children is "grooming".
If anything involves any values or concepts, then it is "grooming".

But the point, of course, is to conflate "any teaching of children" with "sexual abuse of children" and then have that muddled in people's minds so that anything someone dislikes ("you're teaching them values I don't want them taught") can be called "grooming" with all those nastier implications.

They chose "grooming" specifically so that it hits that "this is a sexual danger to your child". If they didn't want that extra kick, they would have stuck with "indoctrination".
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,935
5,046
113
When the usual Libs on this forum claim 6-year olds are masturbating, should receive sex-ed and should be allowed access to birth control, you know we have entered the Liberal bizarro world.

CREEPY!!
 
Toronto Escorts