Jordan Peterson says Ontario psychologist licence may be suspended over public statements

[squeezer]

They can't handle positivity!.......Picture Jack Nicholson saying that.

Do you agree he found a way to monetize his anger? He stumbled onto it and when Fox and the right-wing propaganda machine latched on, he realized he could cha-ching his way up.

Back from 2018 but very spot on

How dangerous is Jordan B Peterson, the rightwing professor who 'hit a hornets' nest'?

Since his confrontation with Cathy Newman, the Canadian academic’s book has become a bestseller. But his arguments are riddled with ‘pseudo-facts’ and conspiracy theories

www.theguardian.com

 

[Knuckle Ball]

Peterson says disparaging things about women all the time;

Jordan Peterson, Custodian of the Patriarchy (Published 2018)

He says there’s a crisis in masculinity. Why won’t women — all these wives and witches — just behave?

www.nytimes.com

From the above article:
“The left, he believes, refuses to admit that men might be in charge because they are better at it. “The people who hold that our culture is an oppressive patriarchy, they don’t want to admit that the current hierarchy might be predicated on competence,” he said.”

So Peterson believes men are more competent than women to hold positions of power.



Also from the article above:
Recently, a young man named Alek Minassian drove through Toronto trying to kill people with his van. Ten were killed, and he has been charged with first-degree murder for their deaths, and with attempted murder for 16 people who were injured. Mr. Minassian declared himself to be part of a misogynist group whose members call themselves incels…

…Violent attacks are what happens when men do not have partners, Mr. Peterson says, and society needs to work to make sure those men are married.

“He was angry at God because women were rejecting him,” Mr. Peterson says of the Toronto killer. “The cure for that is enforced monogamy. That’s actually why monogamy emerges.”

This is why he is called the King of the Incels-he blames women for these mens’ violence and proposes “enforced monogamy” as the solution to this program.

The list of fuckery that Peterson spews is lengthy. Anyone who has listened to him would surely know this.

 

[mandrill]

Peterson says disparaging things about women all the time;

Jordan Peterson, Custodian of the Patriarchy (Published 2018)

He says there’s a crisis in masculinity. Why won’t women — all these wives and witches — just behave?

www.nytimes.com

From the above article:
“The left, he believes, refuses to admit that men might be in charge because they are better at it. “The people who hold that our culture is an oppressive patriarchy, they don’t want to admit that the current hierarchy might be predicated on competence,” he said.”

So Peterson believes men are more competent than women to hold positions of power.



Also from the article above:
Recently, a young man named Alek Minassian drove through Toronto trying to kill people with his van. Ten were killed, and he has been charged with first-degree murder for their deaths, and with attempted murder for 16 people who were injured. Mr. Minassian declared himself to be part of a misogynist group whose members call themselves incels…

…Violent attacks are what happens when men do not have partners, Mr. Peterson says, and society needs to work to make sure those men are married.

“He was angry at God because women were rejecting him,” Mr. Peterson says of the Toronto killer. “The cure for that is enforced monogamy. That’s actually why monogamy emerges.”

This is why he is called the King of the Incels-he blames women for these mens’ violence and proposes “enforced monogamy” as the solution to this program.

The list of fuckery that Peterson spews is lengthy. Anyone who has listened to him would surely know this.

Again, this is the sort of horse-shit that's gonna get his professional licence pulled.

Fat-shaming or trans-shaming might be the current focus of the disciplinary proceedings, but the fucked up gender views are well outside the norm for ANY professional - let alone a mental health professional - and would be toxic in a healing relationship. Imagine....

Pissed off dude "I want to beat the shit out of my wife for asking for money to redecorate the kitchen."

Peterson "Well, you ARE in a leadership position in your household and your anger is reasonable when she challenges your control over the family. I believe that she needs to be forced to stay in the marriage and obey whatever you tell her to do..... Oh and stand up straight with straight shoulders. God likes that."

 

[dirtyharry555]

It's in the Squeezer video. I might be "freely translating", but that is the essence of what the dickhead is saying. That alone is going to get shrink licence yanked.

What do YOU think he says on the topic?

Squeezer's video is some unknown woman narrating a bunch of BS about Jordan Peterson. She doesn't even have the decency to reveal her identity and obviously wouldn't be open to debate him because he would blow her lies apart.

This is the problem... you rely on third parties for your info.

The narrator is of the belief that Marxist aren't bad like Nazis because the Nazis murdered millions of people... she doesn't even understand that Marxists have murdered hundreds of millions.

Everything out of her mouth is a deliberate misinterpretation and fed to people that are already biased against the man.

 

[mandrill]

Squeezer's video is some unknown woman narrating a bunch of BS about Jordan Peterson. She doesn't even have the decency to reveal her identity and obviously wouldn't be open to debate him because he would blow her lies apart.

This is the problem... you rely on third parties for your info.

The narrator is of the belief that Marxist aren't bad like Nazis because the Nazis murdered millions of people... she doesn't even understand that Marxists have murdered hundreds of millions.

Everything out of her mouth is a deliberate misinterpretation and fed to people that are already biased against the man.

So what does she get wrong about him?

 

[Frankfooter]

Same arguments, over and over.

The panel said it recognizes Peterson has a constitutional right to freedom of expression, but as a member of the college it said Peterson is obligated to maintain its professional standards.
Peterson's comments, the panel also concluded, "raise questions about Dr. Peterson's ability to carry out his responsibilities as a psychologist."
The college said his comments about Page and McKenney, for example, reveal that Peterson "may be engaging in degrading, demeaning and unprofessional comments."

 

[Valcazar]

So what does she get wrong about him?

If the complaint is that her video is too short, there is always this one.

 

[mandrill]

If the complaint is that her video is too short, there is always this one.

Dirty was just ranting about how Stalin killed more people than Hitler. Relevant arguments that go to the core of the Peterson issue.

 

[dirtyharry555]

Except we're not the ones who are out of date and falling behind.

One day I hope to be as progressive as you.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1610418261426081795

 

[Valcazar]

One day I hope to be as progressive as you.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1610418261426081795

OMG, Rufo is mad at poetry now?

Is he announcing a new propaganda campaign?

I presume there is some agenda here since he made sure to cut the poem off before it was finished.

 

[The Oracle]

This is why he is called the King of the Incels-he blames women for these mens’ violence and proposes “enforced monogamy” as the solution to this program.

Negative and this has been covered on here before.

Listen to his own words. Enforced monogamy by culture because polygamous cultures become very violent. He states that this has been available in the anthropological literature for 100 years.

As Harry has said on here, members are relying on third party information. In this case a NYT hit piece. Instead listen to him and what he actually says.

Doesn't mean I agree or go along with everything he says either. I do like his willingness to go into the deep waters though.

 

[Knuckle Ball]

Negative and this has been covered on here before.

Listen to his own words. Enforced monogamy by culture because polygamous cultures become very violent. He states that this has been available in the anthropological literature for 100 years.

As Harry has said on here, members are relying on third party information. In this case a NYT hit piece. Instead listen to him and what he actually says.

Doesn't mean I agree or go along with everything he says either. I do like his willingness to go into the deep waters though.

Yes. He wants society to pressure women into marrying and remaining with these incel dip shits so they don’t go off and kill people.

Got it.



PS: Maybe consider sending this Joe Rogan vid to the OCP. I’m sure it will explain everything.

 

[The Oracle]

Yes. He wants society to pressure women into marrying and remaining with these incel dip shits so they don’t go off and kill people.

Got it.



PS: Maybe consider sending this Joe Rogan vid to the OCP. I’m sure it will explain everything.

You're missing the point. He wants society to influence these guys into lifting themselves up to get out of where there are. He specifically says they are to blame for being alone. Not women!

 

[mitchell76]

Same arguments, over and over.

The panel said it recognizes Peterson has a constitutional right to freedom of expression, but as a member of the college it said Peterson is obligated to maintain its professional standards.
Peterson's comments, the panel also concluded, "raise questions about Dr. Peterson's ability to carry out his responsibilities as a psychologist."
The college said his comments about Page and McKenney, for example, reveal that Peterson "may be engaging in degrading, demeaning and unprofessional comments."

Here's a quote from the CBC website, that you quoted. " Peterson said he no longer treats patients and his career is instead focused on social and political commentary."

So IMHO, how does the CPO have the right to try and take away JP's license, when JP's not even seeing patients? I thought that all Lawyers, Doctors, Psychologists etc, get disciplined by their respective colleges, by doing actual harm to a patient or client, not just making general controversial comments on twitter??

 

[mitchell76]

 

[mitchell76]

 

[squeezer]

Here's a quote from the CBC website, that you quoted. " Peterson said he no longer treats patients and his career is instead focused on social and political commentary."

Then he doesn't need his license so what's the big deal? He can go on spouting off his opinion and nonsense license free.

 

[mitchell76]

Then he doesn't need his license so what's the big deal? He can go on spouting off his opinion and nonsense license free.

According to that same CBC site. JP quoted----

Peterson gave up his clinical practice when he gained a global profile, but he said he doesn't want to give up his clinical licence.

"I deserve it. I earned it. I haven't done anything to justify suspending it, and I don't want to give the hyenas their bones."

 

[squeezer]

According to that same CBC site. JP quoted----

Peterson gave up his clinical practice when he gained a global profile, but he said he doesn't want to give up his clinical licence.

"I deserve it. I earned it. I haven't done anything to justify suspending it, and I don't want to give the hyenas their bones."

Then he should follow the rules or the code of ethics put forth when he attained the license.

 

[dirtyharry555]

Peterson says disparaging things about women all the time;

From the above article:
“The left, he believes, refuses to admit that men might be in charge because they are better at it. “The people who hold that our culture is an oppressive patriarchy, they don’t want to admit that the current hierarchy might be predicated on competence,” he said.”

So Peterson believes men are more competent than women to hold positions of power.

That's not disparaging. Unless you believe men and women are equal in all respects (which is obviously not true). Are there plenty of men and women that have leadership qualities? Sure. Are those qualities evenly distributed among men and women. No.

If you want to see what happens when highly educated, strong, independent women are removed from male 'oppression' and left completely on their own watch a few seasons of this show:

The cookie crumbles quickly, and the reliance on the fruits of men's labor and competencies becomes readily apparent.

You'd get the same outcome anywhere including the First World if men were completely removed from the picture. Males of our species build and sustain... I understand this is a hard pill to swallow given the contemporary but deeply flawed narrative that gender is a social construct, and that men and women are identical.

“No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.” Plato