Haven't really followed this, but it could be that Rapp was just a bandwagon-rider who fell off because he got picked apart on the stand.OTOH he was found guilty in another case and has multiple other accusers.
Haven't really followed this, but it could be that Rapp was just a bandwagon-rider who fell off because he got picked apart on the stand.OTOH he was found guilty in another case and has multiple other accusers.
Ce caspita dice? Spacey was never found guilty of anything. The plaintiff in the first case decided not to testify after discovery. If Spacey has a drinking problem he should go to AA meetings, apart from that he should be forgiven.
You can come up with your own conclusion as to whether he's guilty or not...jury found him not guilty and that's all that matters to Mr. Spacey...just because someone accused you of something doesn't mean you're guilty right away...why even file a case against him when you can't prove anything?Civil is on the balance of probability, but the accusations are 40 years old, obviously evidence would be difficult to gather.
No one has to give him the benefit of the doubt based on a trial, only the government. Despite some opinions, the rest of us have no obligation to treat you as innocent just because you were found not guilty. The only thing you're owed for that is the government not being able to sanction you.
We can agree there, I think if Spacey takes accountability and does the actual work, goes to therapy, refrains from drinking, tries to make amends, then in time he can prove that he should be trusted on sets again.That makes me sad, I had no idea he broke his morality clause for House of Cards. He' a phenomenal actor, I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. Anthony Rapp is still a human deer tick.
Kevin Spacey is sick, he needs counseling, still I don't consider him an evil...not in the manner that front-line Scientologists are evil.
I wondered that too…but then again, he might have hoped that issuing a blanket apology would smooth things over with the victim and the allegations would go away?This verdict means nothing.
What really damned Spacey was his response to the accusation. He said that he was drunk, and didn't remember what had happened, but if it did happen the way it was alleged, he was very sorry.
So, let's break this down. Spacey basically admitted that it was a possibility that he sexually assaulted a minor. So, he admitted that he could have pedophile tendencies.
Now I have been very drunk at times back in the day. To the point of passing out. But I can say with absolute certainty, no matter how drunk I may be, I would never even think of try anything sexual with a child, and therefore would never believe there was a chance such an accusation would need an apology from me, even if I couldn't remember anything.
Obviously Spacey thought this action from himself towards a child was not outside the realm of possibility. Otherwise, why would he apologize just in case it did happen?
Sick, sick man.
Richard Steigman, Rapp's lawyer, told Fox News Digital, "For myself, Anthony told his truth in court. While we respect the jury's verdict, nothing changes that."
Different allegations. The 31M was for things on house of cards, this case the post is about was something that occurred in the 80s.Did he have to pay the 31 million for house of cards or that's off now that he isn't being charged?
The house of cards sued him because of this 80's lawsuit...and that he was out of it.Different allegations. The 31M was for things on house of cards, this case the post is about was something that occurred in the 80s.
No, the house of cards sued him because of allegations of sexual harassment against Spacey by several people on set.The house of cards sued him because of this 80's lawsuit...and that he was out of it.
He's good at playing Kevin Spacey. If that's your thing. If you want anything else, then you're shit out of luck with this hack.Good. Maybe he can start making movies again because he's one helluva actor. Shipping News was a really great flick.
Ok thanks for some reason I thought it had to do with this kid. I doubt he'll ever go back to acting with all this garbage.No, the house of cards sued him because of allegations of sexual harassment against Spacey by several people on set.
"A judge on Thursday ruled that Kevin Spacey and his production companies must pay the makers of House of Cards nearly $31 million because of losses brought on by his 2017 firing for the sexual harassment of crew members"
That's not what his statement means. Also keep in mind he had just been publicly outed as gay by the accusation and was trying to deal with that at the same time. Apologizing is the standard tactic for these sorts of things. It is not an admission of anything. Indeed, many jurisdictions including Ontario have an apologies act for the very point of encouraging apologies without exposing you to liability.This verdict means nothing.
What really damned Spacey was his response to the accusation. He said that he was drunk, and didn't remember what had happened, but if it did happen the way it was alleged, he was very sorry.
So, let's break this down. Spacey basically admitted that it was a possibility that he sexually assaulted a minor. So, he admitted that he could have pedophile tendencies.
Now I have been very drunk at times back in the day. To the point of passing out. But I can say with absolute certainty, no matter how drunk I may be, I would never even think of try anything sexual with a child, and therefore would never believe there was a chance such an accusation would need an apology from me, even if I couldn't remember anything.
Obviously Spacey thought this action from himself towards a child was not outside the realm of possibility. Otherwise, why would he apologize just in case it did happen?
Sick, sick man.
I recall watching a documentary about Guy Paul Morin who was accused, tried and (eventually) convicted of killing 9 year old Christine Jessop in Queensville Ontario.If you're not going to play by common morality you're in for a rough time. The Charter came from morality, not vice versa. It reflects how most peopke govern themselves. Good luck if you're ever accused of something you didn't do. It's reliably estimated about one third of peopke in jail are actually innocent. And that's with having to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Imagine how many more people lose in civil court on the lower standard.
I agree. And am I missing something? I thought all Rapp accused him of is briefly laying on top of him.I've always had one very major problem with cases like this.
Why just the lawsuit for big money? It makes me believe the person doing the suing is doing it all for the money.