.
Really
So "The science of heat flow has been scientifically proven for at least 200 years." is not an argument by authority ?
Do you know how to work a search engine ?
I am less inclined to offer assistance to those that dismiss facts out of hand without address them and then add crap like
"Reality readily contradicts what you have asserted and therefore your assertions are garbage, to put it mildly......"
'I don't care if you don't believe it but the scientific method has already beaten you years before you were born..... '
You provided nothing to counter the facts provided and then tossed out insults
So, look it up yourself
And lower density >>> lower pressure
Boyles Law
The relation between density and pressure is given by A Boyles law B Charles law C Gaylussacs law D Avogadros law
www.vedantu.com
So much atmospheres that Pressure is not required???
WTF ?
Pressure is force per unit area & in this case it is the force of gravity which is forcing all those molecules into the unit volume above the unit area i.e. causing the very high density & very high pressure
so much atmosphere forced down towards the surface by gravity CAUSES the pressure
it is not a matter of requiring pressure
Increasing the number of molecules per unit volume results in an increase in the number of molecular collisions >>> increased kinetic energy >>> heat
At the surface the pressure is 90 times greater than 60 kms up & that is what drives the 400 K temp increase despite a constant 95% CO2 atmospheric composition
irrelevant unless you somehow think this negates the probes observations
Hats off to Boris for making the probes work
However, again the probes construction is irrelevant unless you somehow think this negates the probes observations
observations your unable to explain with GHG theory & without using pressure