I believe only in defense of person against grievous bodily harm, not because someone lied to you about the product they were selling.That is where we disagree. As a private citizen I can reasonably tackle someone committing a crime.
...
I believe only in defense of person against grievous bodily harm, not because someone lied to you about the product they were selling.That is where we disagree. As a private citizen I can reasonably tackle someone committing a crime.
...
In a case where the injuries were nothing more then a scraped knee, there likely wouldn't be charges against any civilian but if their actions were outside the law and directly led to the death then absolutely.Yeah see here's where your getting delusional. You keep assuming that a "normal person" would be charged with assault and manslaughter, ...
For these off duty cops and in this situation, it absolutely should have been. Either that or just suck it up that their too good to be true kijiji deal was BS....The point of the post is that calling the cops isn't an option for some people in situations....
wrong. Maybe in your bubble wrap world.For these off duty cops and in this situation, it absolutely should have been. Either that or just suck it up that their too good to be true kijiji deal was BS.
So then how did he end up dying?This post really shows how dumb you are. There's no boot licking going on at all. I don't give a shit if they were cops or Hell's Angels. The point of the post is that calling the cops isn't an option for some people in situations. Dude ripped someone off (in this case it happened to be cops), they chased after him to get their money back, a little struggled ensued and this guys dies hours later without any signs he was beat to death or signs of a serous physical assault.
Is it really that hard to understand for you?
So then how did he end up dying?
My bubble wrapped world where I expect people (police in this case) to do the job they are paid to do.wrong. Maybe in your bubble wrap world.
My bubble wrapped world where I expect people (police in this case) to do the job they are paid to do.
You mean other than they ignored what their job says they should be doing?What does them chasing a thief to get their money back have to do with their ability to do their jobs while on duty?
Okay their buddy....whatever you say.....You mean other than they ignored what their job says they should be doing?
Ah so you assumed. Says it right there in the article buddy.Not sure what this has to do with your boot licking comment, but we don't know. That's the mystery of this isn't it???
What I presumed happened, is the guy maybe bumped is his head in the struggle, and it turned out to be more serious then he thought, or he had some kind of medical condition that acted up. The news is going to sell it to someone like you or basketcase that there's more to this.
Otherwise it wouldn't be a story.
Off-duty police Constables are held to a higher standard than private citizens, just so you know. That is from some of many of my police acquaintances. You cannot argue with this statement.Yeah see here's where your getting delusional. You keep assuming that a "normal person" would be charged with assault and manslaughter, when it this couldn't further from the truth. Just so you know, cops are normal people too, particularly when they're off duty.
Are paid duty officers allowed to attack wanna be thieves with swords?Off-duty police Constables are held to a higher standard than private citizens, just so you know. That is from some of many of my police acquaintances.
Thanks for the strong counter-argument. I do appreciate the chance to hone my debating skills.Okay their buddy....whatever you say.....
Because Darts is as Darts is.Umm, even the hyperlink says it was the store owners that were swinging swords to fend off robbers so why would you ask about paid duty officers?
...
Umm, even the hyperlink says it was the store owners that were swinging swords to fend off robbers so why would you ask about paid duty officers?
Some/many stores have paid duty officers. Just trying to cover another base.
Also, they didn't actually connect with anyone. If they had injured one of them they may very well have faced charges for assault with a weapon.
So, the other option is to just let the thieves in?
Off-duty police Constables are held to a higher standard than private citizens, just so you know. That is from some of many of my police acquaintances. You cannot argue with this statement.
Ah so you assumed. Says it right there in the article buddy.
“A Brampton teenager was pursued and tackled to the ground by two off-duty Toronto police officers over the alleged sale of a counterfeit watch hours prior to his death last spring, disciplinary documents obtained by CTV News Toronto allege.”
The young man was tackled by two off duty police officers which led to his death. I guess in your head two wrongs make a right when it’s a police officer doing it. Hence the boot licker comment lol.
They are bound, even off duty, to do what is right, and not to act as vigilante, if you understand it. Again, anyone with authority and public trust are held to a higher standard, even when off duty. That is fact.My point is that they are normal people, and when someone rips you off, just like your average citizen, there will be a reaction. So lets stop with the "well they are cops so they should handle the situation different average citizen". I have many police acquaintances too, so don't act like just because you know a few cops that holds some sort of merit in this debate.