LILLEY: Trudeau linking Lantsman to swastikas is disgusting

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
Hilarious coming from you




Search through my post history ?
To meet a demand from you?
Yeah I carefully evaluated that request and then I laughed




No I have been consistent stating the BLM protestors wasted an opportunity to push for change via peaceful protest (AKA Dr. King )
They pissed that opportunity away with looting, arson and violence




And with that statement are you "on record" as stating "Canadians rights are at the discretion of Justin Trudeau views and ideology" ?
Let me know if this is true and I will put it "on record" somewhere
If it is not true then explain. After all, we certainly do not want to to mis-represent you
You would already know…

Do you acknowledge any of the false flag violence from the right during those protests?
 

WetSeeker

Well-known member
Jun 23, 2020
499
532
93
People that support Trudeau are mentally ill.
They cannot be helped. They don't want to be helped. They're beyond help.
They are the 32% that gave Trudeau a "clear mandate"...in another universe the other 68% exist. What's worse is that it's 32% of those that actually bothered to vote. Less than 20% of eligible voters checked off "I support Trudeau no matter what, the bogeyman is worse".
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeaGirth

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,286
7,175
113
People that support Trudeau are mentally ill.
They cannot be helped. They don't want to be helped. They're beyond help.
They are the 32% that gave Trudeau a "clear mandate"...in another universe the other 68% exist. What's worse is that it's 32% of those that actually bothered to vote. Less than 20% of eligible voters checked off "I support Trudeau no matter what, the bogeyman is worse".
You are no Psychiatrist to judge the educated Canadians beliefs and decisions!!
Maybe you are referring to that psychotic POTUS who got booted out after just one term and could not accept the results of the 2020 Elections up to this day.
The ones on this Board that religiously believe his so called "Gospel Truth" are the ones that require real counselling!!
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,372
3,026
113
You would already know…
So is that a Yes?

Do you believe "Canadians rights are at the discretion of Justin Trudeau views and ideology" ?


Do you acknowledge any of the false flag violence from the right during those protests?
All I say was proud Canadians waving the Canadian flag as they protested peacefully
No looting, no arson, no violence
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,804
15,382
113
People that support Trudeau are mentally ill.
They cannot be helped. They don't want to be helped. They're beyond help.
They are the 32% that gave Trudeau a "clear mandate"...in another universe the other 68% exist. What's worse is that it's 32% of those that actually bothered to vote. Less than 20% of eligible voters checked off "I support Trudeau no matter what, the bogeyman is worse".
The reason it's only 32% of the popular vote is because of the hicks in Alberta where the Libs get no support. The handful of twat truckers was from Alberta, their organizers from Alberta, so do you think Justin gives a drip of ball sweat care that he doesn't have Alberta's support? NOT!!!

PS....who is the elected Prime Minister of Canada 3 times and counting??? Just for clarification purposes, please.;)
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,612
1,409
113
So there was no flip flop on restrictions by the Trudeau liberals at beginning of this mess?

Nice try, but yet again another lefty lie
You are concerned about a flip flop in a changing environment? Probably the US refused to drop their requirement so the Libs were not dumb enough to drop theirs unilaterally.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,372
3,026
113
You are concerned about a flip flop in a changing environment? Probably the US refused to drop their requirement so the Libs were not dumb enough to drop theirs unilaterally.

The flip flop means he was unsure of his policy as he had been warned it could cause trouble.
And boy did that policy did cause trouble. That should be self evident.

A few weeks after making the wrong decision he declares the emergencies act !

To fix a problem he created.... again
That takes a very special type of stupid

How many self inflicted wounds do you need to see ?
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,612
1,409
113
The flip flop means he was unsure of his policy as he had been warned it could cause trouble.
And boy did that policy did cause trouble. That should be self evident.

A few weeks after making the wrong decision he declares the emergencies act !

To fix a problem he created.... again
That takes a very special type of stupid

How many self inflicted wounds do you need to see ?
Even if he had not flip flopped the outcome would have been exactly the same. The protestors were sore losers like you, that could not accept the result of the election.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,612
1,409
113
People that support Trudeau are mentally ill.
They cannot be helped. They don't want to be helped. They're beyond help.
They are the 32% that gave Trudeau a "clear mandate"...in another universe the other 68% exist. What's worse is that it's 32% of those that actually bothered to vote. Less than 20% of eligible voters checked off "I support Trudeau no matter what, the bogeyman is worse".
People that hate Trudeau are mentally ill. Its his hair, his socks, his possible Cuban father. The fact he wore blackface decades ago. But not real reason to actually criticize his govt polices at all.
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
So is that a Yes?

Do you believe "Canadians rights are at the discretion of Justin Trudeau views and ideology" ?



All I say was proud Canadians waving the Canadian flag as they protested peacefully
No looting, no arson, no violence
No. And thankfully, they are not. Had these protesters stayed within the bounds of the law, they would have been fine.





What about Doug Fords views? He seemed to have some.
 
Last edited:

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,372
3,026
113
]No. And thankfully, they are not. Had these protesters stayed within the bounds of the law, they would have been fine.
So according to you Peaceful protests in Ottawa by truckers are not within the bounds of the law
but you are OK with
  1. the looting, arson and violence of BLM protestors,
  2. the burning of churches by those outraged by the residential schools
  3. blockage of pipeline construction by paid activists
  4. blockage of a vital railway by native peoples
  5. Freezing of ordinary Canadians bank accounts for donating to what they believe to be a worthwhile cause.
So just to be clear
For you "who" is the determining factor for the application of laws
 
  • Like
Reactions: WetSeeker and fall

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
So according to you Peaceful protests in Ottawa by truckers are not within the bounds of the law
but you are OK with
  1. the looting, arson and violence of BLM protestors,
  2. the burning of churches by those outraged by the residential schools
  3. blockage of pipeline construction by paid activists
  4. blockage of a vital railway by native peoples
  5. Freezing of ordinary Canadians bank accounts for donating to what they believe to be a worthwhile cause.
So just to be clear
For you "who" is the determining factor for the application of laws
Well…. You could have asked what I was, and was not ok with. You chose to “assume”.

I guess I get to assume things when we argue in the future then. 👍
 

SeaGirth

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2022
343
271
63
Maybe you are referring to that psychotic POTUS
Antisocial media Rule #2: When an intelligent response involving a Canadian Prime Minister cannot be achieved, revert to Trump and beat the chest as mightily as possible to try and deflect from the main issue.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: fall

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,372
3,026
113
People that hate Trudeau are mentally ill. Its his hair, his socks, his possible Cuban father. The fact he wore blackface decades ago. But not real reason to actually criticize his govt polices at all.
There are plenty of reasons to criticize his ideological driven policy's

  1. The emergencies act and the restrictions on Internet postings are defiantly an assault on Canadians freedoms
  2. The compelled speech (i.e you must address a trans person using only approved pro-nouns) has never before been forced on a democracy
  3. They are not balanced. ie. policies targeting specific industries and provincial economies for shutdown
  4. They are corrupt -SNC
  5. They are corrupt - WE
  6. None are developed with any real consideration for financial responsibility- The National Debt is going to handcuff Canadas for generations
  7. They are inflationary- = you argued inflation was transitory- well it is not and it will destroy the lives of many Canadians
  8. They are divisive- Canada has never been more divided
  9. They are ineffective- billions spent, yet some Canadians still have boil water advisory
  10. They are not applied- Roxam road is a gapping hole for violating our immigration laws
  11. They are corrupt- Taxpayers money used to buy biased media coverage for the Liberal party
  12. They are economically irresponsible -tax targeting small business
  13. They are corrupt- he shut down an investigating in his families financial affairs with the corrupt WE charity
  14. They are short sighted- Justin continues to paint himself into a corner- pipeline policies resulted in the govt being forced to buy a pipeline
  15. They are short sighted- Justin continues to paint himself into a corner- Regulatory red tape has driven up the cost of the needed pipeline expansion
  16. They are short sighted- Justin continues to paint himself into a corner- Trucker policies resulted in the abusive emergencies act- he refused to have a sit down with protestors
  17. There is no oversight- His infrastructure bank does not have a clue where the money went- Billions have been transfer overseas
  18. They are corrupt- Taxpayers money used to bribe other countries in a failed attempt to buy a UN security seat
  19. They are short sighted- immigration will be required, however his policies are quota based , drive by the UN, as opposed to bringing in people who will contribute to Canada
  20. They are Gerald Buts policies- Justin is too stupid to develop policy. WTF is a non-elected activist doing determining national policy ?
  21. etc, etc, etc

I knew Justin was a moron in 2015, I did not expect him to be corrupt and I did not expect him to be so destructive to Canada
So yeah, plenty of reasons to criticize his ideological driven policy's
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcpro and fall

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,372
3,026
113
Even if he had not flip flopped the outcome would have been exactly the same. The protestors were sore losers like you, that could not accept the result of the election.
Wrong
No ill-advised policy targeting Truckers >>>> no protests in Ottawa >>>> No foolish over-reaction with the emergencies act required

It is a straight-line cause and effect trail of fault leading back to the moron Justin Trudeau

One stupid decision led to another stupid decision
same with pipelines
He painted himself into a corner and had to overpay (with taxpayer $) for a pipeline which he will not expand despite the its critical need..

the application of emergencies act is going to cost him big time

How many times do you need to see this fool self-inflict wounds before you realize how stupid he is ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jcpro and fall
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts