Hot Pink List

LILLEY: Trudeau linking Lantsman to swastikas is disgusting

SeaGirth

Well-known member
Jan 22, 2022
343
271
63
Why Canada Will Become a Dictatorship Under Trudeau
The leader of that party does what he wants, when he wants, and no one dares question him. Would a Prime Minister Trudeau arbitrarily whip the vote and outlaw certain moral questions? Could Prime Minister Trudeau be trusted to make decisions for the good of the country, not just for his personal self-worth? Would Trudeau call in the police to enforce his vision? Let's hope we never have the opportunity to ask those questions.
By
Daniel Dickin, Contributor
Community activist, author, conservative
12/12/2014 12:59pm EST | Updated February 11, 2015

Originally published in the Prince Arthur Herald
It's becoming clearer as the days of Trudeau's Liberals wear on: if elected Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau would turn Canada into a dictatorship.

This is the man who admitted he "admires China's basic dictatorship." It wasn't just a sarcastic comment - he seriously said that he admires the dictatorship because they can get things done quickly.
And it's becoming clearer that Trudeau not only admires the dictatorship -- he runs the Liberal Party like one too.
How else can one explain the police-enforced acclamation of Andrew Leslie as the Liberal candidate for Orleans? Even with hundreds of Liberals attending the meeting to show their support for another candidate (and former Trudeau leadership rival), it was clear from the beginning that Leslie was Trudeau's hand-picked favourite, and certainly wouldn't be stopped by pesky processes like "democracy."

Just the imagery of Trudeau's chosen candidate being selected with police intervention is scary. It shows that Trudeau doesn't just admire China's dictatorship -- he would practice one if he had the chance.

The nomination in Orleans is only the latest rigged "open nomination." Despite Trudeau's promises to actually, you know, practice democracy, at least a half dozen Liberal nominations have been rigged or tampered with through the direct intervention of Trudeau's office: mysteriously disqualifying candidates, changing nomination dates, paperwork going "missing," and using dirty "back-room" politics to ensure the leader's candidate is chosen at any cost.
But those are only Liberal candidates; surely Trudeau would loosen his grip on his caucus colleagues once they've been elected, wouldn't he? Unfortunately, no. The Liberal caucus randomly learned one morning early last year that their leader had come up with a new diktat: that all Liberals would be expected, no, required, to vote pro-choice. When Trudeau's pathetic attempted defence (that they were "the party of the Charter," obviously missing those small sections about freedom of conscience and religion) agitated more than a few Liberal MPs, he attempted to invent some weird "grandfathering" rule. But then he went back on that too.
The result is that Liberal MPs who dare question the diktat of Trudeau are being punished. Those who dare disagree have already been punished, resigned, or indicated that they won't seek another term in office -- at least not under the iron fist of Trudeau.
Or we can look to the expulsion of those kinda-sorta-maybe "Senate Liberals," who were unilaterally expelled (but not really) by Trudeau without the slightest consultation with the Senate Liberal leadership.

The Liberal Party under Justin Trudeau has become a dictatorship. The leader of that party does what he wants, when he wants, and no one dares question him.
Now that we know that Trudeau runs his party like a dictatorship, we must ask ourselves: is there any indication he wouldn't do the same as the leader of Canada?
Would a Prime Minister Trudeau arbitrarily whip the vote and outlaw certain moral questions? Could Prime Minister Trudeau be trusted to make decisions for the good of the country, not just for his personal self-worth? Would Trudeau call in the police to enforce his vision?
Let's hope we never have the opportunity to ask those questions.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,342
4,968
113
Bouncy Castles, hot tubs and Bollywood dancing while proudly waveing the Canadian Flag in the streets of Ottawa- This is not an emergency!
I agree there is a lot of hyprocracy but if you think the emergency act is about Bouncy Castles, hot tubs, Bollywood dancing and waving the flag you are completely divorced from reality.

It's a bit like claiming Bill Cosby was put in jail for selling jello. Pol Pot was a bad guy because he didn't like people who wear eye glasses.

You damn well know that isn't what brought on the emergency act, or you should.

Actually I'd like to peacefully express my free speech on this topic. You don't mind if I park a rig blocking your home while I honk my horn constantly... right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Valcazar and stedon

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,806
22,230
113
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,635
1,431
113
There are no issues.
Just whining and entitlement.

Unless you count Pat King and his great replacement theory.
Still waiting to see his reply of his top 5 issues. He is either a slow thinker or just a typical angry dude that has no idea why he is angry. lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,395
3,061
113
]I agree there is a lot of hyprocracy but if you think the emergency act is about Bouncy Castles, hot tubs, Bollywood dancing and waving the flag you are completely divorced from reality.
Claiming this group is a bunch of Nazis, misogynists racists intent on violent over throw of the government is completely divorced from reality,

It's a bit like claiming Bill Cosby was put in jail for selling jello. Pol Pot was a bad guy because he didn't like people who wear eye glasses.
You left out Hitler, Stalin, Saddam and Mao in your absurd list of irrelevant comparisons
How can you be " inclusive" if you leave out some monsters ?
Bill Cosby? Better include Weinstein and Trudeau as long as totally inappropriate sexual conduct has been introduced




You damn well know that isn't what brought on the emergency act, or you should.
I do damn well know what brought on the emergency act>>>> A god damn fool Justin Trudeau who painted himself into a corner ....,.again

Actually I'd like to peacefully express my free speech on this topic. You don't mind if I park a rig blocking your home while I honk my horn constantly... right?
If I had restricted your ability to earn a living and refused to meet with you, and intentionally mis-represented you via my bought and paid for media, then I would be surprised if all you did was honk your horn
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
Mandril,
Pipeline protestors will hold whatever bullshit opinions they want. They just can not block construction of pipelines
BLM protestors will hold whatever opinions they want. They just can not loot start arsons or create violence
Native protestors will hold whatever opinions they want. They just can not block Railways


Everyone has a right to protest, peacefully
In your world it depends on who is protesting , rather than what they are protesting


Burn church's in outrage over Residential school, OK by you - No emergency act
A nutjob kills a soldier on Parliament Hill and enters the Parliament buildings- No emergency act
9/11- No emergency act
Bouncy Castles, hot tubs and Bollywood dancing while proudly waveing the Canadian Flag in the streets of Ottawa- This is not an emergency!

A bit more than a year ago, you were all for defunding the police
But now you want the police to use 1,000 lb. horses to run rough over those you perceive as your ideological opposition

So hypocritical

Downtown Ottawa is not vital infrastructure, the paper pushing still continues
The boarder crossings are vital infrastructure, I will agree to that
And of course, since you are calling people hypocritical… you can show us the posts where you fully supported the BLM protesters rights? Or the Natives right to protest on the railway lines?

(we already know that answer…. You don’t have to tap dance, I mean reply)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,635
1,431
113
Claiming this group is a bunch of Nazis, misogynists racists intent on violent over throw of the government is completely divorced from reality,


You left out Hitler, Stalin, Saddam and Mao in your absurd list of irrelevant comparisons
How can you be " inclusive" if you leave out some monsters ?
Bill Cosby? Better include Weinstein and Trudeau as long as totally inappropriate sexual conduct has been introduced





I do damn well know what brought on the emergency act>>>> A god damn fool Justin Trudeau who painted himself into a corner ....,.again



If I had restricted your ability to earn a living and refused to meet with you, and intentionally mis-represented you via my bought and paid for media, then I would be surprised if all you did was honk your horn
Actually it was Joe Biden that said that, not Trudeau. Truckers could still return to Canada with no jab, but cannot go to USA. Once again more right wing lies.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,395
3,061
113
Actually it was Joe Biden that said that, not Trudeau. Truckers could still return to Canada with no jab, but cannot go to USA. Once again more right wing lies.
So there was no flip flop on restrictions by the Trudeau liberals at beginning of this mess?

Nice try, but yet again another lefty lie
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeaGirth

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,395
3,061
113
And of course, since you are calling people hypocritical… you can show us the posts where you fully supported the BLM protesters rights? Or the Natives right to protest on the railway lines?

(we already know that answer…. You don’t have to tap dance, I mean reply)
BLM and Natives have a right to peacefully protest.

Why BLM threw away their opportunity to push for change via peacefully demonstrate (AKA Dr. King) with idiotic looting, arson and violence remains a mystery

Natives were blocking vital infrastructure

I guess in your rush to attack me you missed the last line in my post
The boarder crossings are vital infrastructure, I will agree to that
No need to tap dance when I have given some careful thought to the opposing sides point of view and applied rational logic
You should try that sometime.

Now pay attention
Every Canadian has a right to peacefully demonstrate, not just the groups aligned with Justin Trudeaus ideology

"A Canadian is a Canadian, is a Canadian"

Do you recall that statement by the moron Justin Trudeau?
He said it right after he gave a killer $10.5 MM of taxpayers money
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeaGirth

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
BLM and Natives have a right to peacefully protest.

Why BLM threw away their opportunity to push for change via peacefully demonstrate (AKA Dr. King) with idiotic looting, arson and violence remains a mystery

Natives were blocking vital infrastructure

I guess in your rush to attack me you missed the last line in my post


No need to tap dance when I have given some careful thought to the opposing sides point of view and applied rational logic
You should try that sometime.

Now pay attention
Every Canadian has a right to peacefully demonstrate, not just the groups aligned with Justin Trudeaus ideology

"A Canadian is a Canadian, is a Canadian"

Do you recall that statement by the moron Justin Trudeau?
He said it right after he gave a killer $10.5 MM of taxpayers money
Not an attack…. Let’s not get dramatic. I asked if you could provide any posts on this threads about the BLM or Native protest where you stated that. Can you? Did you?

Coming and support something today in order to help the new narrative does not count. It’s pretty close to virtue signalling.

One of the guys here did just that. He’s on record of both threads denouncing the stupid, but supporting the rights.
 

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,342
4,968
113
Claiming this group is a bunch of Nazis, misogynists racists intent on violent over throw of the government is completely divorced from reality,
Fine, I never said they were, actually I have disputed the misogynist racist angle. They did however literally call on the GG to disband parliament and held the downtown hostage.

That doesn't change how you either intentionally misrepresented or completely did not understand why the emergency act was done, trying to paint it as a response to bollywood dancing et al. It wasn't and you should know better if you were being sincere.
Hell I could be a flat earther [i'm not] but that doesn't change you being divorced from reality.
 
Last edited:

NotADcotor

His most imperial galactic atheistic majesty.
Mar 8, 2017
7,342
4,968
113
Why BLM threw away their opportunity to push for change via peacefully demonstrate (AKA Dr. King) with idiotic looting, arson and violence remains a mystery

Natives were blocking vital infrastructure
Every Canadian has a right to peacefully demonstrate, not just the groups aligned with Justin Trudeaus ideology
Hilarious.

So when it's your people, it's OK to be terrorist goons. Blockading vital border crossings, interfering with peoples lives and abilities to go about their day. When "They" do it, it isn't peaceful and we must smash.
You are really no different from the people you complain about and you don't see it. I think that's the worse part. I'd respect you a lot more if you knew what you were doing and didn't care.
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,395
3,061
113
]So when it's your people, it's OK to be terrorist goons. Blockading vital border crossings, interfering with peoples lives and abilities to go about their day. When "They" do it, it isn't peaceful and we must smash.
what part of
"Every Canadian has a right to peacefully demonstrate, not just the groups aligned with Justin Trudeaus ideology"
did you not understand ?

Who is doing the smashing here?
Were mounted 1,000 lb, horses brought into break up pipeline / railway blockages ?
No

Was the emergency act invoked for:
  1. 911,
  2. a killer nutob storming the parliament buildings after murdering a soldier on duty
  3. Burning of churches ?
No it was invoked to deal with a group of peaceful protestors who Justin Trudeau refused to talk to
and it was invoked to deal with a mess Justin Trudeau created.

From now on you will need to ensure anything you feel strongly about had better align with Justin Trudeaus views

He works for you , not the other way around
 

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,395
3,061
113
Fine, I never said they were, actually I have disputed the misogynist racist angle. They did however literally call on the GG to disband parliament and held the downtown hostage.

That doesn't change how you either intentionally misrepresented or completely did not understand why the emergency act was done, trying to paint it as a response to bollywood dancing et al. It wasn't and you should know better if you were being sincere.
Hell I could be a flat earther [i'm not] but that doesn't change you being divorced from reality.
as per Mark Strahl, MP

Briane is a single mom from Chilliwack working a minimum wage job. She gave $50 to the convoy when it was 100% legal. She hasn’t participated in any other way. Her bank account has now been frozen. This is who Justin Trudeau is actually targeting with his Emergencies Act orders.
Justin Trudeau works for Briane , sadly he does not understand this

Justin Trudeau created this mess, and refused to discuss the issue with the Canadian protestors
and he created a much bigger mess invoking the emergencies act and freezing bank accounts

Will Justin Trudeau also freeze the accounts of any Canadian who donated to the "Tides Foundation" ??
That might prove awkward for him and Gerald when they need cash
(They will just expense it and have you the taxpayer, cover them)

Justin Trudeau works for Briane
Briane should sue what's left of Justin's brains out
Oh wait.........how can she do that with a frozen bank account?

So if I were to donate say $50 to Briane legal fund, would I get my bank account frozen?
Obviously it is not aligned with Justin views or his interest
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jcpro

JohnLarue

Well-known member
Jan 19, 2005
17,395
3,061
113
]Not an attack…. Let’s not get dramatic.
Hilarious coming from you


I asked if you could provide any posts on this threads about the BLM or Native protest where you stated that. Can you? Did you?
Search through my post history ?
To meet a demand from you?
Yeah I carefully evaluated that request and then I laughed


Coming and support something today in order to help the new narrative does not count. It’s pretty close to virtue signalling.
No I have been consistent stating the BLM protestors wasted an opportunity to push for change via peaceful protest (AKA Dr. King )
They pissed that opportunity away with looting, arson and violence

One of the guys here did just that. He’s on record of both threads denouncing the stupid, but supporting the rights.

And with that statement are you "on record" as stating "Canadians rights are at the discretion of Justin Trudeau views and ideology" ?
Let me know if this is true and I will put it "on record" somewhere
If it is not true then explain. After all, we certainly do not want to to mis-represent you
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts