Ok. We disagree then.
Is showing a paper at a restaurant the same as being denied an abortion? No. Not at all. I agree there.
But what you have to do to get that piece of paper is the same as someone say forcing Britney Spears to wear an IUD against her will. Which I personally think is wrong. Do you think it is okay for someone to make you wear an IUD if you don’t want to?
To get that paper, you have no choice but to submit to a medical procedure. Which is where the “my body, my choice” comes into play.
But if you only want to compare paper to body and ignore what the body has to do to get that paper, then yeah - it would seem ridiculous I guess.
I also did not say that is all I want to compare.
Stop putting words in my mouth please.
I was directly responding to a specific post that compared vaccine passports to a woman's right to her body.
Britney did not have a choice unlike people who can choose to be vaccinated or not.
If I need to delve further into the subject, does a woman's right to her body spread a potentially deadly virus? Do the rights of women and POC (human beings just like men and white folk) spread a potentially deadly virus that is affecting the world?
You can compare them all you want but there is one major difference. The rights of human beings who were judged as lesser only because of their sex and/or skin colour vs. those who CHOOSE not to be vaccinated and are not allowed in public leisure areas because they could potentially spread a deadly virus.
Women and POC do not choose their birth sex or race.
When women and POC are considered a potentially deadly virus, then maybe you can make a comparison.
Some people are all about choice, and they have that choice to be vaccinated or not.
So what about a vaccinated person's choice to not be around unvaccinated people?
Would you be in an uproar if we vaccinated people were the minority and expected to stay home to avoid the unvaccinated who were enjoying leisure activities? Would human rights matter to you then?
I doubt it.