Yes. It was public.
Four agencies lean zoonotic,
One agency leans lab leak
Three said they really can't make a call.
They all agree it wasn't developed as a biological weapon.
Six of the eight are against the idea it was genetically engineered. Two say they don't have enough evidence.
In other words, once again, nothing has changed.
There is limited evidence and people are still studying.
Pure zoonotic is the most likely explanation.
Laboratory escape is plausible but less likely.
Man-made very unlikely.
Bioweapon not really a serious option.
And still waiting for backup on the "one of them ended up on a ventilator" version of the "three people got sick in November during flu season" story.
Which you said was reported on with this release of the intelligence report.
Do you have an unclassified version of the report that specifies that?
There is nothing unbelievable about that.
It is plausible, but less likely than zoonotic.
This is the same thing I have been saying for months, maybe a year now.
As I said, you believe in "the narrative" and will just interpret things to fit the narrative you want.
This is who you are.
So again, you think the White house report by the intelligence agencies is a lie and the REAL report says "high confidence" and all the agencies have different views?
It is all an elaborate fake out because they are saving it to check China?
It's a good narrative.
Very exciting.