And, of course, the "fact checkers" also needed evidence that it was "liar, liar pants on fire"- which they didn't have. But, we did have a Chinese doctor and a whistleblower Dr. Li Meng Yan- back in September. Of course you didn't see it. And this is how Forbes addressed it- https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucel...ovid-19-coronavirus-has-ties-to-steve-bannon/I guess logic was not part of your education.
If you want to claim it was a man-made virus, provide some evidence (and no one in any authority position has backed that claim).
If you want to claim it was an accidental leak of a natural virus, the claim also needs evidence.
Meanwhile there are people who research genetics and genetic drift who say that there is no evidence of the virus being manipulated.
Oh, btw. There were others. But, since it was declared a "conspiracy", no one gave it a look. No one looked at the actual claims. I will let you explain the logic behind that approach, since you seem to be an expert on logic and things logical.