If it was 25 years ago it would have been, "He just got his bell rung. He should be good to go for Saturday."
Headshot or blindside. Make your pick.So what's the rule?
It'll be a no brainer for management.While I could be wrong, anyone who thinks Tavares will be back for any part of this series is fooling themselves. After watching what happened, anyone in management who would let him play again within the next 10-14 days is crazy. That said, it is the Leafs we're talking about here, so anything is possible.
I agree with Thornton coming out of the lineup but at practice this morning he was on the 4th line with Spezza and Simmonds. Maybe we will see an angry Joe in game 2?Even with Tavares out I think the Leafs need to move on from Thornton at least for next game.
Made a few bad turnovers yesterday... even if you were a very smart, but never a fast player like Joe there is almost always some equilibrium point where your lack of foot speed will make it hard to make plays and could make you turnover prone.
Leafs have done a decent job adding back end depth — I would play someone else next game.
Except when he panicked behind the net. Instead of taking a hit he chipped the puck over the glass. Speaking of which, I can't remember the last time a team took 3 delay of game penalties for putting the puck over the glass.It's only game 1, lots of hockey left.
Matthews is showing some ferocity, I love it when his mojo is in overdrive.
Nylander showed up to play, you could feel the fire in his belly, he was engaged on every level.
Kudos to him for manning up.
What did you think of his over all game last night?Except when he panicked behind the net. Instead of taking a hit he chipped the puck over the glass.
Headshot or blindside. Make your pick.
What? You asked for a rule I said which one and you responded with some sort of half conspiracyThe NHL has done a wonderful job of fooling you and many others.
Just like boxing and MMA, they know people think hitting and fighting is an exciting part of the sport, but the minute something goes wrong, it's the players fault. Kind of like letting someone with a Ferrari drive as fast as they want, then telling them they need to be able to come to a full stop at any given time.
I wouldn't get worked up over it...he's being a dick just to be difficult.What? You asked for a rule I said which one and you responded with some sort of half conspiracy
The NHL clearly allows hitting, but it defined what is illegal hits and which type of illegal hits will always be subject to disciplinary review.
Google NHL rule 48. In the summer of 2010 in response to some brutal hits the prior few years that caused longtime injuries to players such as David Booth and Marc Savard, rule 48 was established to disallow lateral or blindside hits where the head was one of the areas that was targeted. In 2013 there was a rule amendment that penalized all hits that target the head no matter what direction they come from.
They also established a policy that all such hits would automatically be reviewed for additional discipline injury or not.
Fighting is a 5 minute penalty. It is not subject to additional discipline.
He's stuck in the '70s.What? You asked for a rule I said which one and you responded with some sort of half conspiracy
The NHL clearly allows hitting, but it defined what are illegal hits and which type of illegal hits will always be subject to disciplinary review.
Google NHL rule 48. In the summer of 2010 in response to some brutal hits the prior few years that caused longtime injuries to players such as David Booth and Marc Savard, rule 48 was established to disallow lateral or blindside hits where the head was one of the areas that was targeted. In 2013 there was a rule amendment that penalized all hits that target the head no matter what direction they come from.
They also established a policy that all such hits would automatically be reviewed for additional discipline injury or not.
Fighting is a 5 minute penalty. It is not subject to additional discipline.