Will you take the COVID-19 vaccine?

Will you take the COVID-19 vaccine?

  • Yes, as soon as possible

    Votes: 220 57.7%
  • Yes, but I do not want to be among the first to take it.

    Votes: 68 17.8%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 17 4.5%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 21 5.5%
  • Absolutely not

    Votes: 50 13.1%
  • I do not care if I do or don't

    Votes: 5 1.3%

  • Total voters
    381
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

xmontrealer

Well-known member
May 23, 2005
10,159
7,593
113
Had Pfizer at UTM yesterday, in and out in 45 minutes and no side effects so far
My Pfizer was 3:30 yesterday. Arm mildly sore last night, but very sore this morning. Had to cancel my booking with an sp today because of it.

No fever, but a little less "zip". Compared to my usual flu shot my arm pain was 2 to 3 times worse...
 

PeteOsborne

Kingston recon
Feb 12, 2020
2,134
1,952
113
kingston
Thailand suspends mass vaccinations with AstraZeneca jab, in wake of blood clot deaths

Thailand recently put its COVID-19 vaccination drive on hold after reports of adverse reactions came to light. This decision to suspend vaccinations comes after a number of European countries decided to halt their use of the vaccine due to reports of blood clots.

Thai Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha and other government officials were originally scheduled to get vaccinated on March 12 during a scheduled morning program. However, the announcement meant that the event at the kingdom’s health ministry did not push through. Reporters who had gathered at the ministry were informed of the delay only after they’d arrived.

Thailand is the first Asian country to suspend its vaccination drive. Thai health authorities said they halted the vaccine rollout after some people reported experiencing side effects or adverse symptoms. Thai Deputy Prime Minister and Public Health Minister Anutin Charnvirakul said in a Facebook post: “To slow down or to pause vaccinations to investigate [adverse reactions] is [a] common medical practice.” He also added that the government’s vaccine management committee acted to ensure the maximum safety of the public.

Thailand has reserved 61 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, most of which are slated to be produced locally in partnership with Thai biopharmaceutical company Siam Bioscience. It also imported two million doses of the Sinovac jab, which its neighbors have been using for their vaccination programs. Indonesia started vaccinating its population in mid-January 2021, while the Philippines commenced its vaccination efforts at the beginning of March.

The suspension mirrors the decision made by some European countries to stop using the AstraZeneca vaccine on their citizens. A ZeroHedge report named these countries as Norway, Denmark, Estonia, Iceland, Luxembourg, Italy, Latvia and Lithuania, among others. A number of people from these countries developed unusual blood clots after receiving the AstraZeneca jab. (Related: Eight European nations pause AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccinations after reports of “serious” blood clot.)

AstraZeneca vaccine beset with issues from the start
When Denmark reported the first cases of blood clotting, its health ministry immediately acted. The country’s health minister Magnus Heunicke tweeted that the AstraZeneca jab was put on hold as part of “precautionary measures … following a signal of a possible serious side effect in the form of fatal blood clots.”

Austria also reported similar cases of blood clotting and temporarily halted use of the vaccine, but the Austrian government did not suspend use of the jab entirely. It later said that vaccinations using the AstraZeneca vaccine will continue. Meanwhile, Italy’s drug regulatory agency stopped using the jab after two deaths were linked to it.

Outside of Europe, the AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine also played a role in the hospitalization of Australia’s federal health minister Greg Hunt. The minister was sent to the hospital with a “suspected infection.” Hunt posted on March 8 that he got the first dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine the previous day. Former Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who was with Hunt that day, also got vaccinated. (Related: Australian Navy caught in massive coronavirus vaccine side effects COVER-UP as sailors collapse into “critical condition” following vax jabs.)

A spokesman for the health ministry said Hunt was “being kept for observation” and was expected to make a full recovery. The health minister was discharged on March 13 and said he would return to parliamentary duties on March 15.

Meanwhile, the British-Swedish drug manufacturer claimed its vaccine is subject to “strict and rigorous quality controls.” It defended the safety of its COVID-19 vaccine, saying that there have been “no confirmed serious adverse events” associated with the jab. Furthermore, the company said that the number of cases in which their vaccine may have caused unusual blood clots was very small. Of the three million that received the jab, only 22 were reported to have experienced thromboembolic events.

Nevertheless, the company said that it is in close contact with authorities in Austria and would fully support investigations into the matter. On March 10, the European Medicines Agency declared that there is no evidence linking AstraZeneca’s vaccine to the two cases of blood clots in Austria.

Visit VaccineInjuryNews.com to find out more about the health risks associated with COVID-19 jabs.

Sources include:

FT.com

APNews.com

BWorldOnline.com

ZeroHedge.com

TheLocal.at

GreatGameIndia.com
Don't know why you keep posting these, they have all been shown to be false or misleading.
Even the last sentence you posted disproves the headline. "On March 10, the European Medicines Agency declared that there is no evidence linking AstraZeneca’s vaccine to the two cases of blood clots in Austria."
 

PeteOsborne

Kingston recon
Feb 12, 2020
2,134
1,952
113
kingston
3,964 Dead 162,610 Injuries: European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 “Vaccines”


3,964 Dead 162,610 Injuries: European Database of Adverse Drug Reactions for COVID-19 “Vaccines” - Mark Taliano
This guy wrote an opinion article based on raw data and did not use the guide on how to understand the raw data.
http://www.adrreports.eu/en/understanding_reports.html
He obviously failed to read or just ignored the disclaimer.
http://www.adrreports.eu/en/disclaimer.html
 

doggystyle99

Well-known member
May 23, 2010
7,901
1,210
113

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,066
2,938
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
The fully vaccinated are getting infected again, demonstrating yet again that vaccines don’t really work as promised



Covid-19 is beginning to spike in over a dozen states, most with high vaccination rates. Hawaii’s Department of Health has begun to report on covid-19 cases occurring in people who are fully vaccinated against covid-19. The Department is labeling these “breakthrough cases,” but says that people should not be alarmed. It turns out that healthcare professionals are not worried about these post-vaccination covid-19 cases.

For over a year, a covid-19 case was treated as a serious issue, with 14-day quarantines and aggressive contact tracing. But if the covid-19 case is detected after vaccination, the public should NOT be alarmed. In an attempt to plunge as many needles in people arms as possible, health authorities deceive patients about vaccine safety and efficacy and nonchalantly brush aside any covid-19 cases that appear in the fully vaccinated.

Doctors admit the vaccines do not prevent infection, so what’s the point?
The doctors reporting for KITV4 in Hawaii even admit that the vaccine “doesn’t prevent infection!” If disease prevention and eradication is the traditional goal of vaccination, then why are people still testing positive after covid-19 vaccination, and why are people still getting fever, chills, headaches and respiratory illness after submitting to the shots?

Instead of addressing vaccine efficacy issues, the doctors who spoke to KITV4 discouraged travel after vaccination. Dr. Melinda Ashton, Chief Quality Officer with Hawaii Pacific Health said that one breakthrough case of covid-19 was from a healthcare worker who traveled to multiple cities, before testing positive. “Absolutely you need to be careful during those times when you’re in the airport, on the airplane, with other people in larger groups,” Ashton said, while ignoring the issue of waning vaccine efficacy. It doesn’t matter whether anyone gets vaccinated or not…it seems anyone has the exact same risk of being infected with covid. This confession debunks any crooked rationale used to install coercive Vaccine Passports. (Related: Top 7 reasons people are testing positive for covid-19 after vaccinations.)

Doctors routinely ignore the data and lie about vaccine side effects and hospitalizations
Dr. Julius Pham, chair of the COVID-19 committee at Queen’s Medical Center, admitted that the vaccines aren’t perfect but did offer significant protection against hospitalization. This statement is deception as well. According to the latest updates to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), there have been 6,786 emergency room visits after administration of covid-19 vaccines in the US. There have also been 5,920 doctor’s visits and 762 permanent disabilities linked to the experiment. Most shocking, the covid-19 vaccine is associated with 4,063 hospitalizations and another 1,644 fatalities. At least 38, 303 adverse events have been reported in the US so far, representing less than one percent of all issues associated with these vaccines.

Most of these issues aren’t being reported and are being accepted as normal. People are sometimes bedridden after the second dose of mRNA and are suffering from fever, chills and severe headaches. Instead of addressing these serious issues, many healthcare professionals are telling patients these vaccine injuries are much easier to endure than a hypothetical infection. Patients are told that any coronavirus infection after covid-19 vaccination is a mild infection compared to what they would have experienced. This is also an untrue statement, for most covid-19 cases were mild, asymptomatic, and easily treated. How do health authorities make such a general assumption about potential infections, as they plunge needles, with experimental, untested vaccines, into people’s arms and promise brighter days?

If these experimental vaccines worked as promised, then fully vaccinated patients should never become infected. Instead, the fully vaccinated are told to wear a mask and avoid family members until everyone submits to the group experiment. This is a blatant confession that the vaccine science does not work. Dr. Michael Walter, Kalihi-Palama Health Center, spoke to KITV4: “Over time, as more people get vaccinated, we have more time under our belt with this vaccine, we have a better idea of how long the protection lasts.”

According to clinical studies, the so-called protection didn’t last for long, as antibody levels waned within two to three months. In order to stay concurrent with the vaccine science, vaccinated individuals will theoretically NEVER be fully vaccinated and would need updates to their cells four to six times each year. The makers of the mRNA vaccine science at Moderna report that they have “hacked” human DNA and are using mRNA to upload software and updates to human cells. If the fully vaccinated are getting infected…is it already time to upgrade their system?

In the end, it will be much easier to convince the vaccine compliant population to segregate those who are “vaccine hesitant” — blaming healthy people for spreading infections they do not have, but sooner or later, the vaccinated will go along with all the new vaccine updates in order to be considered “safe” again. The destruction of human bodies, minds and civilization will only continue.

Sources include:

KITV.com

Forbes.com

 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,966
15,566
113
The fully vaccinated are getting infected again, demonstrating yet again that vaccines don’t really work as promised



Covid-19 is beginning to spike in over a dozen states, most with high vaccination rates. Hawaii’s Department of Health has begun to report on covid-19 cases occurring in people who are fully vaccinated against covid-19. The Department is labeling these “breakthrough cases,” but says that people should not be alarmed. It turns out that healthcare professionals are not worried about these post-vaccination covid-19 cases.

For over a year, a covid-19 case was treated as a serious issue, with 14-day quarantines and aggressive contact tracing. But if the covid-19 case is detected after vaccination, the public should NOT be alarmed. In an attempt to plunge as many needles in people arms as possible, health authorities deceive patients about vaccine safety and efficacy and nonchalantly brush aside any covid-19 cases that appear in the fully vaccinated.

Doctors admit the vaccines do not prevent infection, so what’s the point?
The doctors reporting for KITV4 in Hawaii even admit that the vaccine “doesn’t prevent infection!” If disease prevention and eradication is the traditional goal of vaccination, then why are people still testing positive after covid-19 vaccination, and why are people still getting fever, chills, headaches and respiratory illness after submitting to the shots?

Instead of addressing vaccine efficacy issues, the doctors who spoke to KITV4 discouraged travel after vaccination. Dr. Melinda Ashton, Chief Quality Officer with Hawaii Pacific Health said that one breakthrough case of covid-19 was from a healthcare worker who traveled to multiple cities, before testing positive. “Absolutely you need to be careful during those times when you’re in the airport, on the airplane, with other people in larger groups,” Ashton said, while ignoring the issue of waning vaccine efficacy. It doesn’t matter whether anyone gets vaccinated or not…it seems anyone has the exact same risk of being infected with covid. This confession debunks any crooked rationale used to install coercive Vaccine Passports. (Related: Top 7 reasons people are testing positive for covid-19 after vaccinations.)

Doctors routinely ignore the data and lie about vaccine side effects and hospitalizations
Dr. Julius Pham, chair of the COVID-19 committee at Queen’s Medical Center, admitted that the vaccines aren’t perfect but did offer significant protection against hospitalization. This statement is deception as well. According to the latest updates to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), there have been 6,786 emergency room visits after administration of covid-19 vaccines in the US. There have also been 5,920 doctor’s visits and 762 permanent disabilities linked to the experiment. Most shocking, the covid-19 vaccine is associated with 4,063 hospitalizations and another 1,644 fatalities. At least 38, 303 adverse events have been reported in the US so far, representing less than one percent of all issues associated with these vaccines.

Most of these issues aren’t being reported and are being accepted as normal. People are sometimes bedridden after the second dose of mRNA and are suffering from fever, chills and severe headaches. Instead of addressing these serious issues, many healthcare professionals are telling patients these vaccine injuries are much easier to endure than a hypothetical infection. Patients are told that any coronavirus infection after covid-19 vaccination is a mild infection compared to what they would have experienced. This is also an untrue statement, for most covid-19 cases were mild, asymptomatic, and easily treated. How do health authorities make such a general assumption about potential infections, as they plunge needles, with experimental, untested vaccines, into people’s arms and promise brighter days?

If these experimental vaccines worked as promised, then fully vaccinated patients should never become infected. Instead, the fully vaccinated are told to wear a mask and avoid family members until everyone submits to the group experiment. This is a blatant confession that the vaccine science does not work. Dr. Michael Walter, Kalihi-Palama Health Center, spoke to KITV4: “Over time, as more people get vaccinated, we have more time under our belt with this vaccine, we have a better idea of how long the protection lasts.”

According to clinical studies, the so-called protection didn’t last for long, as antibody levels waned within two to three months. In order to stay concurrent with the vaccine science, vaccinated individuals will theoretically NEVER be fully vaccinated and would need updates to their cells four to six times each year. The makers of the mRNA vaccine science at Moderna report that they have “hacked” human DNA and are using mRNA to upload software and updates to human cells. If the fully vaccinated are getting infected…is it already time to upgrade their system?

In the end, it will be much easier to convince the vaccine compliant population to segregate those who are “vaccine hesitant” — blaming healthy people for spreading infections they do not have, but sooner or later, the vaccinated will go along with all the new vaccine updates in order to be considered “safe” again. The destruction of human bodies, minds and civilization will only continue.

Sources include:

KITV.com

Forbes.com



THE ABOVE POST CONTAINS NONSENSE AND BULLSHIT

OOOOOH from the FINAL WARNING !
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,697
10,106
113
Toronto
THE ABOVE POST CONTAINS NONSENSE AND BULLSHIT

OOOOOH from the FINAL WARNING !
And he has not yet told us how it feels to spend months of his life researching and posting, yet failing to convince a single person. People keep signing up and lining up.
 
Last edited:

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,966
15,566
113
And he has not yet told us how it feels to spend months of his life researching and posting, yet failing to convince a single person. People keep signing up and lining up.
He's convinced Spfree, Doggyorcg. Decoy oh wait, nevermind.
 

luvyeah

🤡🌎
Oct 24, 2018
2,544
1,199
113
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,066
2,938
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Using Herd Immunity Excuse for Gene Therapy Vaccine on Kids


In children and young adults from age birth to 19, the survival rate of COVID-19 is 99.997%.1,2 In most cases, symptoms are mild or nonexistent. Among children who were hospitalized, 0.19% of children died from COVID-19, with researchers concluding in a 2021 study, “Hospitalization and in-hospital death are rare in children diagnosed with COVID-19.”3

Despite the fact that COVID-19 has had little impact, physically, to children, health officials are setting the stage for widespread vaccination of this population. The University of Oxford, which is collaborating on a COVID-19 vaccine with AstraZeneca, is already enrolling children between the ages of 6 years and 17 years and 8 months in their U.K. vaccine trial.4

A COVID vaccine for infants and children is every bit as unnecessary, dangerous and foolish as the hepatitis B vaccine is for infants that I have been railing against for the past two decades.

Moderna is also enrolling 3,000 children between the ages of 12 and 17 to test their COVID-19 vaccine, using the same dose given to adults,5 while Pfizer also expanded its clinical trials to include children as young as 12.6 Johnson & Johnson even announced on February 28, 2021, that it plans to test its COVID-19 vaccine on infants, including newborn babies, pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.

“They did not get into a lot of detail about it but did make it clear they will be pursuing pediatric and maternal coronavirus immunization studies,” Dr. Ofer Levy, a member of the FDA’s advisory committee who reviewed Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine data, told The New York Times.7

It’s Gene Therapy — Not a Vaccine
The COVID-19 vaccine really isn’t a vaccine in the medical definition of a vaccine. It’s more accurately an experimental gene therapy, of which the effectiveness and safety are far from proven. During the first six weeks the vaccine was available, more than 500 post-vaccination deaths and nearly 11,000 other adverse events were reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).8

According to Children’s Health Defense (CHD), professor Dolores J. Cahill, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and immunologist, “expects to see successive waves of adverse reactions to the experimental messenger RNA (mRNA) injections ranging from anaphylaxis and other allergic responses to autoimmunity, sepsis and organ failure.”9

Considering that children are at extremely low risk from COVID-19, vaccination offers them far more risk than benefit, and parents may be understandably reluctant to volunteer their children to receive this experimental and unlicensed gene therapy. Public health officials have made it clear, however, that vaccination of children is expected. CHD reported:10

“Already last April — when next to nothing was known about COVID’s epidemiology, and candidate vaccines had barely begun to be studied — Bill Gates set the stage for the pediatric push, declaring that the end goal is to make COVID-19 vaccines 'part of the routine newborn immunization schedule.'”
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), also stated that 85% to 90% of the U.S. population, including children, will need to receive a COVID-19 vaccine before life can return to normal, and he suggested that first graders may be authorized to be vaccinated by September 2021.11

Using ‘Herd Immunity’ to Justify Vaccinating Children
Since children themselves have little reason to get a COVID-19 vaccine, health officials are spinning the notion that children must be vaccinated for the sake of herd immunity. Now, they want you to think that not only should you look at the people around you as vectors of disease, but also the children, who could be asymptomatic carriers, silently bringing a deadly disease to grandma’s house.

What’s being largely ignored, however, are the studies showing that children are not driving the COVID-19 pandemic and, in fact, appear less likely to transmit COVID-19 than adults.12

“In short, public health leaders say, parents must ‘vaccinate the young to protect the old.’ Given the federal government’s estimate that one vaccine injury results from every 39 vaccines administered, it seems clear that officials expect children to shoulder 100% of the risks of COVID vaccination in exchange for zero benefit,” CHD noted.13

Herd immunity, which occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease such that it can no longer spread widely in the community, is calculated using reproductive number, or R-naught (R0), which is the estimated number of new infections that may occur from one infected person.14

R0 of below 1 (with R1 meaning that one person who’s infected is expected to infect one other person) indicates that cases are declining while R0 above 1 suggests cases are on the rise. It’s far from an exact science, however, as a person’s susceptibility to infection varies depending on many factors, including their health, age and contacts within a community.

The initial R0 calculations for COVID-19’s HIT were based on assumptions that everyone has the same susceptibility and would be mixing randomly with others in the community. But a study published in Nature Reviews Immunology suggested that the herd immunity threshold for COVID-19 may need to be adjusted because children are less susceptible to the disease:15

“Another factor that may feed into a lower herd immunity threshold for COVID-19 is the role of children in viral transmission. Preliminary reports find that children, particularly those younger than 10 years, may be less susceptible and contagious than adults, in which case they may be partially omitted from the computation of herd immunity.”
COVID Gene Therapy May Not Prevent Transmission
Another point being largely ignored in the mainstream media is that it’s unknown if the COVID-19 vaccines prevent transmission, putting a major hole in the push for vaccine-driven herd immunity.

Unlike conventional vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you’re trying to prevent, the COVID-19 injections contain synthetic RNA fragments encapsulated in a nanolipid carrier compound,16 the sole purpose of which is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.

They do not actually impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease. In other words, they are not designed to keep you from getting sick with SARS-CoV-2; they only are supposed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you do get infected.17,18

At a virtual press conference held by the World Health Organization (WHO) on December 28, 2020, WHO officials warned there is no guarantee that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent people from being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and transmitting it to other people.19

In a New Year’s Day interview with Newsweek, Fauci reinforced the WHO’s admission that health officials do not know if COVID-19 vaccines prevent infection or if people can spread the virus to others after getting vaccinated.20

Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in December 2020 for Pfizer/BioNTech21 and Moderna22 to release their experimental mRNA vaccines for use in the U.S., the companies only provided evidence from clinical trials to demonstrate that their vaccines prevented mild to severe COVID-19 disease symptoms in vaccinated participants compared to unvaccinated trial participants.

The companies did not investigate whether the vaccines prevent people from becoming asymptomatically infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and/or transmitting it to other people.23,24

Meanwhile, if you or your child recovered from COVID-19 or had an asymptomatic case, you likely already have some level of protective immunity25 — another factor being largely ignored in the push to vaccinate children. In fact, trials suggested there’s no benefit to getting vaccinated among those who have been previously infected with COVID-19.26

Using Herd Immunity Excuse for Gene Therapy Vaccine on Kids (mercola.com)
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,966
15,566
113
Using Herd Immunity Excuse for Gene Therapy Vaccine on Kids


In children and young adults from age birth to 19, the survival rate of COVID-19 is 99.997%.1,2 In most cases, symptoms are mild or nonexistent. Among children who were hospitalized, 0.19% of children died from COVID-19, with researchers concluding in a 2021 study, “Hospitalization and in-hospital death are rare in children diagnosed with COVID-19.”3

Despite the fact that COVID-19 has had little impact, physically, to children, health officials are setting the stage for widespread vaccination of this population. The University of Oxford, which is collaborating on a COVID-19 vaccine with AstraZeneca, is already enrolling children between the ages of 6 years and 17 years and 8 months in their U.K. vaccine trial.4

A COVID vaccine for infants and children is every bit as unnecessary, dangerous and foolish as the hepatitis B vaccine is for infants that I have been railing against for the past two decades.

Moderna is also enrolling 3,000 children between the ages of 12 and 17 to test their COVID-19 vaccine, using the same dose given to adults,5 while Pfizer also expanded its clinical trials to include children as young as 12.6 Johnson & Johnson even announced on February 28, 2021, that it plans to test its COVID-19 vaccine on infants, including newborn babies, pregnant women and people with compromised immune systems.

“They did not get into a lot of detail about it but did make it clear they will be pursuing pediatric and maternal coronavirus immunization studies,” Dr. Ofer Levy, a member of the FDA’s advisory committee who reviewed Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine data, told The New York Times.7

It’s Gene Therapy — Not a Vaccine
The COVID-19 vaccine really isn’t a vaccine in the medical definition of a vaccine. It’s more accurately an experimental gene therapy, of which the effectiveness and safety are far from proven. During the first six weeks the vaccine was available, more than 500 post-vaccination deaths and nearly 11,000 other adverse events were reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).8

According to Children’s Health Defense (CHD), professor Dolores J. Cahill, Ph.D., a molecular biologist and immunologist, “expects to see successive waves of adverse reactions to the experimental messenger RNA (mRNA) injections ranging from anaphylaxis and other allergic responses to autoimmunity, sepsis and organ failure.”9

Considering that children are at extremely low risk from COVID-19, vaccination offers them far more risk than benefit, and parents may be understandably reluctant to volunteer their children to receive this experimental and unlicensed gene therapy. Public health officials have made it clear, however, that vaccination of children is expected. CHD reported:10


Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), also stated that 85% to 90% of the U.S. population, including children, will need to receive a COVID-19 vaccine before life can return to normal, and he suggested that first graders may be authorized to be vaccinated by September 2021.11

Using ‘Herd Immunity’ to Justify Vaccinating Children
Since children themselves have little reason to get a COVID-19 vaccine, health officials are spinning the notion that children must be vaccinated for the sake of herd immunity. Now, they want you to think that not only should you look at the people around you as vectors of disease, but also the children, who could be asymptomatic carriers, silently bringing a deadly disease to grandma’s house.

What’s being largely ignored, however, are the studies showing that children are not driving the COVID-19 pandemic and, in fact, appear less likely to transmit COVID-19 than adults.12

“In short, public health leaders say, parents must ‘vaccinate the young to protect the old.’ Given the federal government’s estimate that one vaccine injury results from every 39 vaccines administered, it seems clear that officials expect children to shoulder 100% of the risks of COVID vaccination in exchange for zero benefit,” CHD noted.13

Herd immunity, which occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease such that it can no longer spread widely in the community, is calculated using reproductive number, or R-naught (R0), which is the estimated number of new infections that may occur from one infected person.14

R0 of below 1 (with R1 meaning that one person who’s infected is expected to infect one other person) indicates that cases are declining while R0 above 1 suggests cases are on the rise. It’s far from an exact science, however, as a person’s susceptibility to infection varies depending on many factors, including their health, age and contacts within a community.

The initial R0 calculations for COVID-19’s HIT were based on assumptions that everyone has the same susceptibility and would be mixing randomly with others in the community. But a study published in Nature Reviews Immunology suggested that the herd immunity threshold for COVID-19 may need to be adjusted because children are less susceptible to the disease:15


COVID Gene Therapy May Not Prevent Transmission
Another point being largely ignored in the mainstream media is that it’s unknown if the COVID-19 vaccines prevent transmission, putting a major hole in the push for vaccine-driven herd immunity.

Unlike conventional vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you’re trying to prevent, the COVID-19 injections contain synthetic RNA fragments encapsulated in a nanolipid carrier compound,16 the sole purpose of which is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.

They do not actually impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease. In other words, they are not designed to keep you from getting sick with SARS-CoV-2; they only are supposed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you do get infected.17,18

At a virtual press conference held by the World Health Organization (WHO) on December 28, 2020, WHO officials warned there is no guarantee that COVID-19 vaccines will prevent people from being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and transmitting it to other people.19

In a New Year’s Day interview with Newsweek, Fauci reinforced the WHO’s admission that health officials do not know if COVID-19 vaccines prevent infection or if people can spread the virus to others after getting vaccinated.20

Although the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) in December 2020 for Pfizer/BioNTech21 and Moderna22 to release their experimental mRNA vaccines for use in the U.S., the companies only provided evidence from clinical trials to demonstrate that their vaccines prevented mild to severe COVID-19 disease symptoms in vaccinated participants compared to unvaccinated trial participants.

The companies did not investigate whether the vaccines prevent people from becoming asymptomatically infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and/or transmitting it to other people.23,24

Meanwhile, if you or your child recovered from COVID-19 or had an asymptomatic case, you likely already have some level of protective immunity25 — another factor being largely ignored in the push to vaccinate children. In fact, trials suggested there’s no benefit to getting vaccinated among those who have been previously infected with COVID-19.26

Using Herd Immunity Excuse for Gene Therapy Vaccine on Kids (mercola.com)

BULLSHIT AND NONSENSE!!!!!
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
32,066
2,938
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Study to Describe the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.gov


Study Design

Go to
sections



Study Type :Interventional (Clinical Trial)
Estimated Enrollment :43998 participants
Allocation:Randomized
Intervention Model:Parallel Assignment
Masking:Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
Primary Purpose:Prevention
Official Title:A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS
Actual Study Start Date :April 29, 2020
Estimated Primary Completion Date :August 3, 2021
Estimated Study Completion Date :January 31, 2023
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,643
60,774
113
Failing to read, or just ignoring the facts is a very common theme amongst the “Stable Genius” crowd aka people who subscribe and promote these false information.
You're forgetting "misunderstanding what they read". That's been the other thing. Even when it does seem they read the piece, they often misrepresent it and I don't think it is always deliberately.

Gym stop training covid vaxxed cients after discovering they are no longer insured
That's going to be an issue. Insurance companies are going to always err on the side of "what can we do that means we never have to pay out" and so they are likely to be aggressive in looking for reasons to invalidate people's insurance.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,966
15,566
113
That's going to be an issue. Insurance companies are going to always err on the side of "what can we do that means we never have to pay out" and so they are likely to be aggressive in looking for reasons to invalidate people's insurance.
I would tend to believe the ones who will be having insurance issues will be the folks not vaccinated if the vaccines prove to be a success.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,643
60,774
113
I would tend to believe the ones who will be having insurance issues will be the folks not vaccinated if the vaccines prove to be a success.
Eventually, yes. But if the company can justify not paying out either way, they will try and do that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Toronto Escorts