I loved Bruce Gamble.now in goal for trawna wearing # 30, Bruce Gamble .
Getting drunk and trying to kiss Suzy Kolber?I'm going Joe Namath for tonight's game.
They were tied for about 10 minutes. Problem is that they couldn't hold the tie and build on that to win the game.Ok this has to stop now, falling behind early and playing catch up for 60 min. Cmon boys - lets turn this ship around.
....while in a fur coat. George, you know me too well as I was thinking that while posting.Getting drunk and trying to kiss Suzy Kolber....?
Personally, I wouldn't trade Nylander for Tkachuk straight up...... you seem to think it would be a good deal for Ottawa to trade your leading scorer and best player for him,
I don't think you'll have to worry about it...Personally, I wouldn't trade Nylander for Tkachuk straight up.
But if someone proposed Tkachuck and Tim Stutzle, GMKD would be a fool to not do that deal.
Just because player X is team Y's best player does not mean that they are necessarily as good as team Z's 4th best player.Personally, I wouldn't trade Nylander for Tkachuk straight up.
But if someone proposed Tkachuck and Tim Stutzle, GMKD would be a fool to not do that deal.
In this case it does...Just because player X is team Y's best player does not mean that they are necessarily as good as team Z's 4th best player.
Which case? It was a hypothetical with X's and Y's.In this case it does...
Is that all you’ve got to say ? I mean if you thought my wish for a Nylander + a prospect for Tkachuk was so ridiculous that deserved a beat down, don’t you have more to say to school him for saying Tkachuk not worth straight up for Nylander, or did you learn your lesson well to be more respectful to those who disagree with you ?I don't think you'll have to worry about it...
While I agree that a team trading their 4th best player for a teams best player may not be a good deal for the team who has traded their 4th best player but in the case of Ottawa trading their best player, Brady Tkachuk, for Nylander, who in fact maybe Toronto's 5th best player...it isWhich case? It was a hypothetical with X's and Y's.
I just read a lot of posts about different teams trading their best player for so and so. My point is that, using the parameter of "a team's best player" is not a consistent parameter in terms of talent/value and as such should not be used in any rational discussion of why trades should or should not be made. It is irrelevant.
Nylander and an AHL player for Tkachuk is ridiculous for Ottawa.Is that all you’ve got to say ? I mean if you thought my wish for a Nylander + a prospect for Tkachuk was so ridiculous that deserved a beat down, don’t you have more to say to school him for saying Tkachuk not worth straight up for Nylander, or did you learn your lesson well to be more respectful to those who disagree with you ?
That‘s fine, that’s your opinion and I respect that. If we all learn to understand and respect that we all have different opinions, we can get into a lot more interesting conversations with being confrontational.Nylander and an AHL player for Tkachuk is ridiculous for Ottawa.
As I said, I was not talking about these two teams in particular. I was saying that making reference to any particular team's best or 2nd or 6th best player in terms of a trade is meaningless in terms comparing talent from another team. The only valid comparison is the relative talent between the players being discussed to each other, not their teammates.While I agree that a team trading their 4th best player for a teams best player may not be a good deal for the team who has traded their 4th best player but in the case of Ottawa trading their best player, Brady Tkachuk, for Nylander, who in fact maybe Toronto's 5th best player...it is