Would love to see that!I'd love to see someone go back and do a review of the different models that came out early and what they actually predicted versus what happened. (I don't know if anyone has done that work.)
Would love to see that!I'd love to see someone go back and do a review of the different models that came out early and what they actually predicted versus what happened. (I don't know if anyone has done that work.)
As has been discussed, the 8,000 is the worst case scenario. The article also quotes 2,000 as the low end and based on the numbers already starting to climb, that seems very reasonable....
Now they say that we could hit 8,000 by next month. At this point, I don’t believe them. These “models” are total bullshit in my opinion now.
Next few weeks will determine whether Ontario will see a 'normal' summer, modelling suggests
Ontarians are being warned that their behaviour over the next few weeks is critical in determining the quality of their summer as COVID-19 cases start to increase and variants pose a significant risk, according to new modelling data.toronto.ctvnews.ca
Many. What's the point? The idea is to catch cases of infection and prevent further spread. Of course people in hospitals and other high risk areas will be tested more than a hermit living outside Sudbury.The media is filled with fake news. A friend of mine who is a Manager and works at the Amazon warehouse which was just shutdown by Peel Health told me he has been tested qty 6 times in the last 3 months. All test came back negative. My question is of the average 50000 test that are performed daily, how many are repeats of the same individuals in high risk environments?
The only people I can think of who would have even bothered is epidemiology twitter and I don't feel like searching through endless posts to see if someone has done it.Would love to see that!
That really is what they wanted... to spread out the infections.... they predicted up to 2 years...What I'd like someone to do is go back to see if any of the Public Health experts predicted that we'd still be in this after a year and counting...
THE ABOVE POST CONTAINS NONSENSE AND BULLSHIT!!!That really is what they wanted... to spread out the infections.... they predicted up to 2 years...
Did you guys actually support the social distancing experiment without understanding how many days would be required???
Look at last picture in particular; 2 years AFTER Covid detected and lockdowns + social distancing we are STILL expected to have as much as 20% of population infected with Covid
The total numbers predicted have not changed very much
The terror for flattening the curve was that the ICUs could not handle an influx of patients
We estimated that 56% (95% credible interval 42%–63%) of the Ontario population would be infected over the course of the epidemic in the base case. At the epidemic peak, we projected 107 000 (95% credible interval 60 760–149 000) cases in hospital (non-ICU) and 55 500 (95% credible interval 32 700–75 200) cases in ICU. For fixed-duration scenarios, all interventions were projected to delay and reduce the height of the epidemic peak relative to the base case, with restrictive physical distancing estimated to have the greatest effect. Longer duration interventions were more effective. Dynamic interventions were projected to reduce the proportion of the population infected at the end of the 2-year period and could reduce the median number of cases in ICU below current estimates of Ontario’s ICU capacity.
lol just because something is too complicated for your little mind to understand does not make it any less trueTHE ABOVE POST CONTAINS NONSENSE AND BULLSHIT!!!
Everything you posted in this nonsensical post towards me applies to you! Look in the mirror and repeat what you just posted to the &$^%@ staring back at you!lol just because something is too complicated for your little mind to understand does not make it any less true
For laughs by all means show us YOUR source that says covid restrictions were meant to last less than a year (as @Fun For All had inquired)
You like to randomly spout off nonsense without any basis in reality usually
Prove me wrong
Can you link to the actual document please?That really is what they wanted... to spread out the infections.... they predicted up to 2 years...
Did you guys actually support the social distancing experiment without understanding how many days would be required???
Its from CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal)Can you link to the actual document please?
Thanks.Its from CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
They have lots of stats and details on website way to much to link a single article, I was cherry picking slides that back up my point
Most of what I took is from Volume 192 Issue 19, published May 11 2020
About CMAJ | CMAJ
www.cmaj.ca
Vast majority didThanks.
They did run their model for 2 years.
The point is our elected officials don't come on TV and state.Many. What's the point? The idea is to catch cases of infection and prevent further spread. Of course people in hospitals and other high risk areas will be tested more than a hermit living outside Sudbury.
Still trying to figure out why you object to the people at highest risk of catching the virus getting tested more often.The point is our elected officials don't come on TV and state.
1. Of the 50k test we suspect x % are repeat tests of people who work in high risk environments
I don't object.Still trying to figure out why you object to the people at highest risk of catching the virus getting tested more often.
As they should, since the danger of uncontrolled spread is worsened with the people pulling shit.Vast majority did
It was only a few covidiots who actually believed the virus would "go away" in 2 weeks of lockdowns
You can see the griping on this board trying to blame protestors as reason the virus still spread
Not really. Reducing the peak and spreading transmission out also affects total number of deaths, and that's even without the advantage of better treatments over time.Point of lockdown was NEVER to eliminate the virus
It was to space out how many critically ill were in hospital at any given moment
Vast majority of the deaths that did occur were unavoidable and would have happened with or without lockdowns
It has never been a simple trade off. And, as the piece you linked to showed, a more sensible intermittent use of shut down and response has a much better effect. There are reasons other places got it under control and then opened, with targeted restrictions when numbers rose.The only question is whether the psychological damage due to lockdowns is more/less than the damage that would have happened if the death rate was increased
(eg 100 people die per month over 6 months vs 600 people dying in 1 month; which is worse for people in general)
I think everyone knows Ford is a Buffoon at this timeIt has never been a simple trade off. And, as the piece you linked to showed, a more sensible intermittent use of shut down and response has a much better effect. There are reasons other places got it under control and then opened, with targeted restrictions when numbers rose.
Ford will win the next election in a romp...learn to love it.I think everyone knows Ford is a Buffoon at this time
ON suffered some of the worst and longest lockdowns in the world
It was insanity