What point would that be?You should remove that...you made you point...move on.
What point would that be?You should remove that...you made you point...move on.
Please provide the quote where I agreed with what he said.No surprise you agreed with a poster famous for his anti-police and anti-white views.
Exactly, if this guy goes all robocop for illegal skateboarding imagine how a cop would behave when one of you lizards is caught in the act with an 18 year old lol.I sincerely hope that the people on Terb is not representative of the canadian population, because the majority of Terbists applaud any brutality and intimidation by law enforcement.
Ironic, actually, as anyone that procures sex for money is breaking the law.
lol, You're just hoping for something more.Because not all the information is available yet. That will come out in a trial.
For example, there could be bodycam video from the police officer that the public hasnt seen yet
Because not all the information is available yet. That will come out in a trial.
For example, there could be bodycam video from the police officer that the public hasnt seen yet
The point you're making now is not too flattering to yourself...it's only your issue, no one else cares.What point would that be?
He likes to virtue signal. He does it a lotThe point you're making now is not too flattering to yourself...it's only your issue, no one else cares
The point you're making now is not too flattering to yourself...it's only your issue, no one else cares.
That particular member loves the soapbox and actually believes that people care about what he thinks and says. His three favourite words are "racist", "racism" and "racist stereotypes". Sad.He likes to virtue signal. He does it a lot
I have no issue with what you say here. I told IV a few hours ago that I was going to try to tone it down.The point you're making now is not too flattering to yourself...it's only your issue, no one else cares.
You are trying to paint me some way based on me agreeing with Charlemagne. So it is very fair to ask: With what did I agree with him?No surprise you agreed with a poster famous for his anti-police and anti-white views.
His reply to you was relevant. You think cops get more verbal abuse on average than a CSR or some low wage earner in the service industry?You made the association between monetary income and what a cop should be able to tolerate.
I illustrated the shortcoming of your comment by giving an example of where that logic runs out, proving that money has no place in this debate.
Tolerating abuse has nothing to do with money. Based on your reply I don't think you have the compassion to consider that as a possibility.
The floor is yours I'm out.
LJ
I could see it as fairly reasonable to use force to pin him if the suspect had already injured people and was an imminent threat to the public but not if his crime was walking away after getting a ticket and mouthing off to the cop.It was not totally justified. The kid was totally harmless and pinned to the ground. Why did the officer need to smash him in the head? All he did was skateboard through a red light. The officer should be put on leave without pay until it is fully investigated. It was absolutely unnecessary to apply such force in this situation.
Witnesses they interviewed were.News were not there when it happened....or were they?
Is that supposed to justify use of force on a guy for swearing?A couple of days ago in Mount Albert the police took down a man armed with a knife who was charging at them. That same man also allegedly knifed 4 other people, killing one. Yes, the police officers used their guns.
I was responding to danmand who said police don't need guns. They definitely did need guns when attacked by a maniac with a knife who had already stabbed 4 people killing one.Is that supposed to justify use of force on a guy for swearing?