Russia interfered - it is a fact. Their officers were indicted for it - it is a fact.
Indicted yes (for quite specific alleged conduct), tried and convicted no.
trump asked them to interfere on television is a fact.
If "Russia, if you're listening.." on a publicly televised debate is the "factual" evidence of Trump's diabolical plot, I don't think I have to respond further.
trump campaign lied about their contacts with Russia is a fact.
Lying about lawful activities shouldn't normally lead to charges, but the DOJ proved otherwise. I'm not sure why anyone would applaud it. It leads to justifiable decisions to discontinue prosecutions, and failing that, justifiable pardons, as actually occurred.
if not for POS like Barr even righties would be able to see it. But it’s not convenient so let’s talk about British agents as if it matters.
You guys can't decide if Barr is a patriot (no evidence of widespread voter fraud, Trump dishonoured his office by what he said to the protesters) or Trump's lackey. Only once you decide which would there be anything to respond to.