Sen. Rand Paul continues making false claims of 2020 election fraud
Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Sen. Rand Paul appeared on ABC's "This Week."
abcnews.go.com
They had over 60 opportunities to present even one rational shred of evidence. Every single judge laughed them out of court. Any potential irregularities have been debunked after 2 and a half months.LOL!!! I saw that and bottom line is that ANY allegations of irregularities in the election process should be investigated automatically. It was my only comment after the election on the subject. Sen. Paul said virtually the same thing and he has been remarkably consistent on that point. And it wasn't done. So, now we have two sides, again. One side says there's nothing to see here and the other side has already began calling Biden the Pretender in Chief. The integrity of the electoral process is everything.
Biden is a phony, off with his head. Sen Paul is a staunch believer of private health care, he had his hernia operation at Shuldice. Canada's Sweetheart has been calling for a two tier health system since the late 70's. Private health care for the nobility and table scraps for peons.LOL!!! I saw that and bottom line is that ANY allegations of irregularities in the election process should be investigated automatically. It was my only comment after the election on the subject. Sen. Paul said virtually the same thing and he has been remarkably consistent on that point. And it wasn't done. So, now we have two sides, again. One side says there's nothing to see here and the other side has already began calling Biden the Pretender in Chief. The integrity of the electoral process is everything.
Incorrect. A judge's laughter is no substitute for a credible investigation. Justice not only must be done, but it must be also seen.They had over 60 opportunities to present even one rational shred of evidence. Every single judge laughed them out of court. Any potential irregularities have been debunked after 2 and a half months.
No. It is a reaction to the results of the investigations done in those 60 cases. They were laughable.Incorrect. A judge's laughter is no substitute for a credible investigation. Justice not only must be done, but it must be also seen.
No investigations have been conducted to address specific allegations, especially in Pennsylvania and Michigan. Almost everything have been "debunked" based on the media's say so. Just like the Hunter's corruption allegations, then we found out, AFTER the election, that the NYT sat on the story of the FBI's investigation into Hunter's activities. Justice MUST BE SEEN to be effective and legitimate!No. It is a reaction to the results of the investigations done in those 60 cases. They were laughable.
If there was any legit evidence presented in court to get things going, then there would have been more widescale investigations. But we are now almost 3 months after the election and nothing credible has been found.No investigations have been conducted to address specific allegations, especially in Pennsylvania and Michigan.
No. That's what the impartial judges said. They were shown nothing of substance.Almost everything have been "debunked" based on the media's say so.
You left out Benghazi and Pizzagate.Just like the Hunter's corruption allegations,
Well, boy, don't complain about the conspiracy theories, then. Btw, if there was such thing as the "impartial" judges, what's all that hoopla on the Capitol Hill every time they need another judge? Are you that naive??!If there was any legit evidence presented in court to get things going, then there would have been more widescale investigations. But we are now almost 3 months after the election and nothing credible has been found.
No. That's what the impartial judges said. They were shown nothing of substance.
You left out Benghazi and Pizzagate.
Your problem is that the Republican-appointed judges decided against Trump too.Well, boy, don't complain about the conspiracy theories, then. Btw, if there was such thing as the "impartial" judges, what's all that hoopla on the Capitol Hill every time they need another judge? Are you that naive??!
No. ALL those voter fraud allegations were investigated over and over by the state electoral commissions in all of the states trump attacked. Nothing was found.No investigations have been conducted to address specific allegations, especially in Pennsylvania and Michigan. Almost everything have been "debunked" based on the media's say so. Just like the Hunter's corruption allegations, then we found out, AFTER the election, that the NYT sat on the story of the FBI's investigation into Hunter's activities. Justice MUST BE SEEN to be effective and legitimate!
Good point, JC!Incorrect. A judge's laughter is no substitute for a credible investigation. Justice not only must be done, but it must be also seen.
They WERE investigated automatically. The states checked, re checked and checked again. You just ignore this because you couldn't rant and throw tantrums if you remembered the actual facts in the issue.LOL!!! I saw that and bottom line is that ANY allegations of irregularities in the election process should be investigated automatically. It was my only comment after the election on the subject. Sen. Paul said virtually the same thing and he has been remarkably consistent on that point. And it wasn't done. So, now we have two sides, again. One side says there's nothing to see here and the other side has already began calling Biden the Pretender in Chief. The integrity of the electoral process is everything.
Please detail the specific allegations you refer to.No investigations have been conducted to address specific allegations, especially in Pennsylvania and Michigan. Almost everything have been "debunked" based on the media's say so. Just like the Hunter's corruption allegations, then we found out, AFTER the election, that the NYT sat on the story of the FBI's investigation into Hunter's activities. Justice MUST BE SEEN to be effective and legitimate!
Please detail the specific allegations you refer to.
I think they are imaginary.
Judges being impartial is now a conspiracy theory? You've lost it.Well, boy, don't complain about the conspiracy theories, then. Btw, if there was such thing as the "impartial" judges, what's all that hoopla on the Capitol Hill every time they need another judge?
Judges being impartial THAT is a conspiracy theory. Every one knows that judges are ideological and far from impartial.Judges being impartial is now a conspiracy theory? You've lost it.
Then what happened with Trumps very right wing appointees throwing him under the bus and not willing to play the LET'S STEAL THE ELECTION game for the want to be dictator?Judges being impartial THAT is a conspiracy theory. Every one knows that judges are ideological and far from impartial.