Asian Sexy Babe

2020-21 Maple Leafs Thread

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
Spezza's statement that he'd retire if claimed ensured that nobody would. Good move if he wanted to stay here just in case he's needed.
In case he's needed? Spezza's super valuable on faceoffs. In fact he's leading the league in FO% at 73.5% and Tavares is third at 69.6%. Puck possession off the draw is key.
 
Last edited:

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,814
11,065
113
Toronto
In case he's needed? Spezza's super valuable on faceoffs. In fact he's leading the league in FO% at 73.5%. Puck possession off the draw is key.
When a player gets put on waivers then it means that the team is willing to take the risk that they will lose him.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
When a player gets put on waivers then it means that the team is willing to take the risk that they will lose him.
Except the risk was very small. Especially when you factor in that he would have to quarantine for 14 days should a US team have claim him. That's like missing 8 games or so depending on the team.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
In years past they never used a natural face off guy to start the PK. Don't know why it took them so long to come up with this one. Against Boston and Bergeron Boston started with the puck every time on the PP. Obviously not a good thing.
If you remember the 2013 colossal breakdown in game 7 against Boston. Tyler Bozak, who was an excellent faceoff guy, didn't play because he was injured. Toronto lost key defensive zone faceoffs in the final two minutes of regulation play. Allowing Boston to tie the game and win the series in OT. Bozak was really missed in that final game.
 

John Wick

Baba Yaga
Oct 25, 2019
2,255
2,436
113
When a player gets put on waivers then it means that the team is willing to take the risk that they will lose him.
Except there was no risk, as Spezza speaking through his agent, made it crystal clear that if he was claimed by anyone he would immediately retire. Even HNIC commentators bubbled that up and spoke about it on the broadcast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GameBoy27

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,814
11,065
113
Toronto
Except there was no risk, as Spezza speaking through his agent, made it crystal clear that if he was claimed by anyone he would immediately retire. Even HNIC commentators bubbled that up and spoke about it on the broadcast.
Extremely low risk, but no guarantee. Not sure who, but maybe somebody who really wanted him would make him an offer that he couldn't refuse. Just saying. If a guy is exposed...
 

Fun For All

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2014
11,539
5,797
113
Extremely low risk, but no guarantee. Not sure who, but maybe somebody who really wanted him would make him an offer that he couldn't refuse. Just saying. If a guy is exposed...
These veterans have respect around the league...he says I’m not playing anywhere but Toronto, teams will respect that.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
These veterans have respect around the league...he says I’m not playing anywhere but Toronto, teams will respect that.
True. ^^^

The proof is in the fact that he wasn't claimed by another team.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
Game Day!

Looking forward to the Matthews vs. McDavid matchup tonight.

Leafs 3-1-0
Oilers 1-3-0
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
52,814
11,065
113
Toronto
Well, defence and goaltending were not issues last night. As well, the Leafs had a bit of an edge in territorial play. Bounces did not go their way at either end including an own-goal. As well, that was a phantom penalty call on Jets' 2nd goal. That guy was tripped by his own man, not Muzzin.
 
Last edited:

Sonic Temple

Dreamers learn to steer by the stars
Feb 14, 2020
18,587
27,607
113
Well, defence and goaltending were not issues last. As well, the Leafs had a bit of an edge in territorial play. Bounces did not go their way at either end including an own-goal. As well, that was a phantom penalty call on Jets' 2nd goal. That guy was tripped by his own man, not Muzzin.
Just bad luck on that one. Not sure why they didn't challenge that - actually can you even challenge a penalty?
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
Well, defence and goaltending were not issues last. As well, the Leafs had a bit of an edge in territorial play. Bounces did not go their way at either end including an own-goal. As well, that was a phantom penalty call on Jets' 2nd goal. That guy was tripped by his own man, not Muzzin.
Agreed! ^^^

That really was "one of those games." Bad bounce lead to the first goal and the the phantom call on Muzzin was the TSN turning point. A post here and a couple lucky bounces on the part of the Oilers was all it took to keep the Leafs from scoring. Spezza had a good chance late in the game, but it was a fluttering pass and didn't get all of it to direct it into the net. He was pissed. I'm not upset at how the Leafs played. You're going to lose a couple like that throughout the year. It was not for a lack of effort. They'll bounce back on Friday.
 

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
5,654
1,220
113
They both played the same game. Play it safe. No odd man rushes. The one Edmonton did get they should have scored when McD passed to Kassian who bounced it off the crossbar with Andersen sliding from one side to the other.
 
Last edited:

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
They both played the same game. Play it safe. No odd man rushes. The one Edmonton did get they should have scored when McD passed to Kassian who bounced it off the crossbar with Andersen sliding from one side to the other.
I'm pretty sure Kassian's shot went off Andersen's glove, then the bar. In other words, he was positioned correctly to make the save. If the shot was a few inches lower (to go in under the bar) it would've gone in his glove.
 

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
If so then good save but the point was it was a prime scoring chance based off of an odd man rush which was rare in this game.
Andersen did what he had to do. Put himself in a position to make a save so give him credit. Kassian though didn't have to shoot where his glove was either. There was an opening. Andersen wasn't set. He was sliding. That's all a shooter can ask for.
For sure... There weren't too many odd man rushes. Both teams played a very defensive game, which wasn't what I was expecting. Kassian was just trying to bury it up top, as fast as he could get the shot away. At that speed, I don't think he much time to place it anywhere else. In hindsight, he probably thinks he should've placed it somewhere else. But too late now! lol
 

superstar_88

The Chiseler
Jan 4, 2008
5,654
1,220
113
Kassian is not a sharp shooter. He was just shooting at the vacinity of the net. He's more or less just McD's protector.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GameBoy27

GameBoy27

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2004
12,920
2,940
113
Thornton out awhile with a wrist injury.
That sucks.

Kassian is not a sharp shooter. He was just shooting at the vacinity of the net. He's more or less just McD's protector.
Regardless, it was a good shot though. I've played with quite a few ex-NHL players over the years. Even the worst have mad skills and can shoot the puck.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts