Antifa trash Democratic Party headquarters in Oregon

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,064
5,440
113
Lewiston, NY
Umbrella men. There's even one in the picture 👌 ...
 

kherg007

Well-known member
May 3, 2014
9,001
7,021
113
This makes no sense except false flag.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,310
4,500
113
Because Antifa certainly wouldn't have an issue with the Author of the Crime Bill and Co Author of the Patriot Act, both of which militarized the police and locked up millions.....
.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,983
2,467
113
More organized violence from the group that doesn't exist (according to Biden).
 

Fun For All

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2014
11,269
5,547
113
These fuckers are only there to destroy. Right or left it does not matter it seems. These are bums. Just like those that storm the capitol.
Yes, the thought that ANTIFI is Democratic supporters has always been wrong...they hate all government.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
NO!!! Say it isnt so??!!

Who'd think that someone would just put a shirt on and claim to be a supporter of a party just to cause trouble for THAT party???? Hmmmm.......

NO WAY!! Could NEVER happen, fuckin dummy.
Watch it with the insults.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,587
21,793
113
I agree with watching the insults ffs ?
where are the administrators they just seem to pick and choose who the suspend or ban for crying out loud . Can we no disagree and not insult
Its more about who goes to the mods, which I generally don't do.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
32,546
60,131
113
Would be nice if it wasn't a Daily Mail article so that these things could be credibly assessed. Seems like a bunch of different protest groups all being lumped together and it is unclear which were actually claiming to be Antifa and which weren't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

smallhatchet

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2020
2,071
221
63

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,167
9,883
113
Toronto
Oh ok well said ya I have no interest in doing that either
If one were to track the blatant profane insults and present them as a group showing a pattern, it would be better than picking and choosing.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,167
9,883
113
Toronto
And you are who around here??

Its easy to call mommy to fight your battles, eh?

Is that how your childhood was growing up all the time???


MOMMY!!! HELP!!!! LMAO
So you feel calling someone a "fuckin dummy" is proper, even though you know that it is against guidelines?
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,983
2,467
113
If one were to track the blatant profane insults and present them as a group showing a pattern, it would be better than picking and choosing.
How about the broken windows approach? If you do it, you're off to the penalty box, every time - BEFORE anyone feels compelled to respond in kind.

Of course, you'd also have to crack down on trolling and all the other tactics that lead to the insults.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,983
2,467
113
So you feel calling someone a "fuckin dummy" is proper, even though you know that it is against guidelines?
There's no doubt that, in isolation, it's not proper. The question is whether it was a proportionate response to an equally offensive post. You can avoid such analysis with the broken windows approach.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,167
9,883
113
Toronto
How about the broken windows approach? If you do it, you're off to the penalty box, every time - BEFORE anyone feels compelled to respond in kind.

Of course, you'd also have to crack down on trolling and all the other tactics that lead to the insults.
One can insult without profanity and blatant name calling. Trolling, etc. is no justification.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts