The election litigation thread
- Thread starter Dutch Oven
- Start date
Ok, S, I'll bite.
What merits did all 60 judges miss that your superior legal expertise thinks would have won those 60 cases?
I sure hope its not just your theory of fact and law that appears rational......
Bingo! There's your problem right there. I'm going to leave you to figure that out on you own. You should be able to do it.
Powell is a lawyer representing clients. It's not whether she, as a person, is credible, it's whether the claims her clients are advancing (through her) are credible. I could give you a few reasons why the Guiliani team wanted her cases to proceed independently (and I already have), but I don't think that will help you much, because you're still focused on her as a person, instead of on what she is saying.
That assessment came from CISA, not the FBI. You are too much work. You had no trouble believing the outlandish theory behind Russian meddling in the 2016 election (which has, at least, been fully investigated by the FBI), but you can't conceive of any way domestic actors might take advantage of election security vulnerabilities in 2020? Your reasoning is inconsistent and appears to be entirely results driven.
Some abbreviations are to save keystrokes (ROFLMAO), some are to avoid vulgarity (DT, HJ, BBBJ). Your OIC accomplishes neither. What is it's purpose?
Last edited:
I didn't think you could find any real reason that all 60 judges were wrong and you are right.
First you admit that she's not credible then you try to argue that despite that you should still listen to her? Yet when I post articles showing that her claims aren't credible you only can reply with your S signature.
Next you'll say we should pay attention to johnlarue's scientific ramblings.
Now that you admit that Powell is not credible you're left with Rudy Giuliani as the leader of your legal arguments.
Do you think Rudy is credible, S?
Gentlemen of this thread,
Remember, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink…
The “rule” has always been that anything written here is open to comment by anyone else. You cannot “privatize” what you write, so to speak. No exceptions. To privatize, use PM.
And to infer from our strong, collective disagreement with him that we are either one and the same person, or we are involved in some kind of conspiracy against him…
All I can say is WOW!
Some logic!
Wisdom is not Dutchie’s strong suit.
Trolling may very well be: "I freely admit that posting here on TERB is an unjustifiable waste of time, but a guilty pleasure."
BTW... this post is not intended for Dutchie...
Perry
Remember, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink…
The “rule” has always been that anything written here is open to comment by anyone else. You cannot “privatize” what you write, so to speak. No exceptions. To privatize, use PM.
And to infer from our strong, collective disagreement with him that we are either one and the same person, or we are involved in some kind of conspiracy against him…
All I can say is WOW!
Some logic!
Wisdom is not Dutchie’s strong suit.
Trolling may very well be: "I freely admit that posting here on TERB is an unjustifiable waste of time, but a guilty pleasure."
BTW... this post is not intended for Dutchie...
Perry
Last edited:
my passive aggressive answer to you is
Hilarious lack of knowledge and reality! Please, more!
PS.......S
Gentlemen of this thread,
Remember, you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink…
The “rule” has always been that anything written here is open to comment by anyone else. You cannot “privatize” what you write, so to speak. No exceptions. To privatize, use PM.
And to infer from our strong, collective disagreement with him that we are either one and the same person, or we are involved in some kind of conspiracy against him…
All I can say is WOW!
Some logic!
Wisdom is not Dutchie’s strong suit.
Trolling may very well be: "I freely admit that posting here on TERB is an unjustifiable waste of time, but a guilty pleasure."
BTW... this post is not intended for Dutchie...
Perry
The Electoral College has voted Ridin' Joe Biden the 46th president of the USA. The election is over and the winner has won and the loser has lost.
Dutch Oven...... He had a Big Dream. A Large Dream. A More Sizeable than Average Dream. But it was a Dream that wouldn't be what it could be. And a Dream that couldn't be what it would be.
Now that Big Dream, that Large Dream is over. Trump is a Loser and Biden is a Winner. It's time for Dutch to get his big winter coat and his little fluffy winter hat and go home to his loved ones. I guess maybe they miss him. Or possibly not. He gave what he gave and it was a giving time for him. But that too is now past. His giving has been given and he gave it.
Dutch Oven...... He had a Big Dream. A Large Dream. A More Sizeable than Average Dream. But it was a Dream that wouldn't be what it could be. And a Dream that couldn't be what it would be.
Now that Big Dream, that Large Dream is over. Trump is a Loser and Biden is a Winner. It's time for Dutch to get his big winter coat and his little fluffy winter hat and go home to his loved ones. I guess maybe they miss him. Or possibly not. He gave what he gave and it was a giving time for him. But that too is now past. His giving has been given and he gave it.
Obviously when you are cornered that is the best that you can come up with!!
Do not need your explanation as to why Giuliani wanted her to proceed "independently". We all know that she came up with statements that were too outrageous for even Giuliani's team to try and justify. Especially after she claimed on Newsmax that she was part of Trump's legal team:
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?
www.bloomberg.com
You just want to believe what you want to believe, period and not the full facts!! CISA came up with the assessment but in conjunction with the CIA and FBI. So read this :
FBI, NSA confident in election: 'Security of your vote has never been higher,' says cyber security agency
William Evanina,\u00a0director of the National Counterintelligence and Security\u00a0Center said the \
www.usatoday.com
Obviously you cannot comprehend that following the Mueller investigation, it was clear that Russia was complicit in the interference in the 2016 elections!!
You are making a clown out of yourself:
What does oic mean? oic Definition. Meaning of oic. OnlineSlangDictionary.com
This Slang page is designed to explain what the meaning of oic is. The slang word / phrase / acronym oic means... . Online Slang Dictionary. A list of slang words and phrases, idioms, jargon, acronyms, and abbreviations.
onlineslangdictionary.com
Biden has hit 302 votes at the electoral college.
Trump is done.
Someone is as big a loser as this letter.
Trump is done.
Someone is as big a loser as this letter.
Dutchie,
There are several million lawyers out there...
That you consider me the 2nd best of all is quite an honor... thank you!
What about you? Are you designating yourself #1? Or are you conceding that you are inferior to me?
Perry
There are several million lawyers out there...
That you consider me the 2nd best of all is quite an honor... thank you!
What about you? Are you designating yourself #1? Or are you conceding that you are inferior to me?
Perry
Last edited:
