Lockdowns will cause 10 times more harm to human health than COVID-19 itself, says infectious disease expert

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,207
9,891
113
Toronto
I just saw a poll of 20,000 Americans who were asked if they felt that the negative effects of a lockdown were worse than the negative effects of the virus.

85% said, NO. Just sayin'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doggystyle99

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
I just saw a poll of 20,000 Americans who were asked if they felt that the negative effects of a lockdown were worse than the negative effects of the virus.

85% said, NO. Just sayin'.
Ok. Turn off the government cash tap and ask them again in a couple of weeks. Repeat the exercise in Canada, just for shit and giggles.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,291
6,661
113
  • Like
Reactions: lenny2

sp free

Well-known member
May 31, 2003
2,094
590
113
What difference does it make about their “neighbours?”

Has anyone here ever been to Norway? It’s freaking deserted.

Every country or state counts differently and none of them are accurate.

There’s no one way of doing things that’s been proven to be any more effective than any other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheeta

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,207
9,891
113
Toronto
Ok. Turn off the government cash tap and ask them again in a couple of weeks. Repeat the exercise in Canada, just for shit and giggles.
In the meantime, this is the current reality. Speculate all you want.
 

HungSowel

Well-known member
Mar 3, 2017
2,819
1,709
113
Ok. Turn off the government cash tap and ask them again in a couple of weeks. Repeat the exercise in Canada, just for shit and giggles.
The US gave out ~$1200 one time for the past 7 months, or about $200 a month. It is not the gravy train you make it out to be.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
20,422
14,933
113
What difference does it make about their “neighbours?”

Has anyone here ever been to Norway? It’s freaking deserted.

Every country or state counts differently and none of them are accurate.

There’s no one way of doing things that’s been proven to be any more effective than any other.

You obviously do not get laid often by different women from different countries. Norway has some hot toned blondes. You need to get out more. It doesn't matter if you're wearing your CM hat, Decoy hat or SPFree hat, just get out there and get laid a little. It will help with the conspiracy absorption you feel you need to consume to survive.
 

sp free

Well-known member
May 31, 2003
2,094
590
113
You obviously do not get laid often by different women from different countries. Norway has some hot toned blondes. You need to get out more. It doesn't matter if you're wearing your CM hat, Decoy hat or SPFree hat, just get out there and get laid a little. It will help with the conspiracy absorption you feel you need to consume to survive.
I’ll compare resumes any time chum.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,701
4,767
113
And higher than much of Europe.

Is being only 4th worst supposed to prove something?
It proves that the Swedish model worked better than some countries which mandated masks
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,701
4,767
113
Stating something repeatedly like a self hypnotizing brainwashing mantra does not make it true, let alone convince the intelligent, or address my reply:

https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/loc...nfectious-disease-expert.727689/#post-6842941

https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/why-most-masks-dont-work.726027/page-14#post-6844161

Sweden's deaths per capita are lower than UK, Spain, Italy and Belgium
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,701
4,767
113
The US gave out ~$1200 one time for the past 7 months, or about $200 a month. It is not the gravy train you make it out to be.
You're forgetting about the millions of people in the US who are currently on unemployment insurance.
That money will eventually run out because UI has a limited time frame
 

lenny2

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2012
3,574
729
113
Sweden " recorded its highest tally of deaths in the first half of 2020 for 150 years, the Statistics Office said on Wednesday."


"... COVID-19 meant that deaths were some 10 percent higher than the average for the period over the last five years, the Statistics Office said. In April the number of deaths was almost 40% higher than average due to a surge in COVID-related fatalities.


"... The economy of Finland also outperformed its larger neighbour (=Sweden) in the second quarter, despite a tougher lockdown. Finland’s gross domestic product shrank around 5% against an 8.6% contraction in Sweden from the previous three-month period.


 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,701
4,767
113
Sweden " recorded its highest tally of deaths in the first half of 2020 for 150 years, the Statistics Office said on Wednesday."


"... COVID-19 meant that deaths were some 10 percent higher than the average for the period over the last five years, the Statistics Office said. In April the number of deaths was almost 40% higher than average due to a surge in COVID-related fatalities.


"... The economy of Finland also outperformed its larger neighbour (=Sweden) in the second quarter, despite a tougher lockdown. Finland’s gross domestic product shrank around 5% against an 8.6% contraction in Sweden from the previous three-month period.


You're overlooking one thing. If by the end of this year Sweden's total deaths arent much over the 91,000 median number, then all those people who died from coronavirus were probably gonna die from natural causes anyways. I am going to revisit that statista site in January of 2021 to see if Sweden had drastically more deaths in 2020 then they usually have (which is between 90,500 and 91,000 annually).

So far they're on course to have about 4,000 more deaths, but their monthly death rate has fallen by quite a bit over the last 4 months, so it looks like they wont be much over 91,000.

Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/525353/sweden-number-of-deaths/

 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr.Know-It-All

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,701
4,767
113
I just saw a poll of 20,000 Americans who were asked if they felt that the negative effects of a lockdown were worse than the negative effects of the virus.

85% said, NO. Just sayin'.
Please post the link of this poll. I wanna have a look at their data
 

lenny2

Well-known member
Jan 18, 2012
3,574
729
113
You're overlooking one thing. If by the end of this year Sweden's total deaths arent much over the 91,000 median number, then all those people who died from coronavirus were probably gonna die from natural causes anyways. I am going to revisit that statista site in January of 2021 to see if Sweden had drastically more deaths in 2020 then they usually have (which is between 90,500 and 91,000 annually).

So far they're on course to have about 4,000 more deaths, but their monthly death rate has fallen by quite a bit over the last 4 months, so it looks like they wont be much over 91,000.

Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/525353/sweden-number-of-deaths/
Regardless with the 40% increase in deaths in Sweden in April, that means Swedes are dying before their time relative to the average.

Sweden is on pace for about 95,000 deaths this year, more than 6000 above 2019.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doggystyle99

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
51,207
9,891
113
Toronto
Are the harms of lockdown worse than the virus itself? (Percentage of 27,599 votes)
10.23.20

  • Yes 17%
  • No 83%
That's all I can get. It was an informal poll where TV viewers had an hour to vote.
 

sp free

Well-known member
May 31, 2003
2,094
590
113
Regardless with the 40% increase in deaths in Sweden in April, that means Swedes are dying before their time relative to the average.

Sweden is on pace for about 95,000 deaths this year, more than 6000 above 2019.
And the lockdown countries?
 
Toronto Escorts