Children! Children! Please... All it takes is few waves of the wand and US Supreme Court can make anything immoral legal - including torture on US soil. And still create local jobs.Not a big mystery to wonder about. Guantanamo was not on US soil.
Children! Children! Please... All it takes is few waves of the wand and US Supreme Court can make anything immoral legal - including torture on US soil. And still create local jobs.Not a big mystery to wonder about. Guantanamo was not on US soil.
You are a character or a troll or just an ignorant twat LMAO. You do realize we send our young to war right. I'm safe either way as I'I'm too old to go to war and fairly young enough to beat COVID but that still makes you one of the 3 choices I laid out.You are all missing the real point: All Lives Aren't Equal. We all know that women of childbearing age are way more valuable than men of similar age. One man can impregnate as many women as presented to him. Whereas women have a finite number of children they can bear.
So with all this hysteria about masks saving lives, whose lives are we trying to save and whose do we not? Do we really think the lives of people over 65 are worth more than people's lives under 25? Do we think senior citizens are the future of humanity? Should we try to protect Boomers from looming death while traumatizing and stunting the growth of people under 25? I say, fuck the Boomers. We need to start living again. Heck, there will even be a glut of available real estate if this happens.
Clearly you are once again wrong. Since a male can sire multiple more children than a woman can bear, a male is much more valuable.You are all missing the real point: All Lives Aren't Equal. We all know that women of childbearing age are way more valuable than men of similar age. One man can impregnate as many women as presented to him. Whereas women have a finite number of children they can bear.
Facepalm.Clearly you are once again wrong. Since a male can sire multiple more children than a woman can bear, a male is much more valuable.
Math says that if creating more children is the goal and a man can sire hundreds of children but a woman can bear about a dozen at most, clearly the man is more valuable. Losing a woman means a dozen less children. Losing a man means a hundred less children.Facepalm.
Do the math. In terms of procreating, one man can easily replace 1000 men. But one woman cannot replace 1000 women.
It’s irrelevant whose life he thinks is more valuable and it has no bearing on if masks work or not, the subject of the thread, we live in an advanced society and protecting the elderly or those who are in high risk health categories is an example of the quality of life we all are afforded.Clearly you are once again wrong. Since a male can sire multiple more children than a woman can bear, a male is much more valuable.
Seriously, your posts are on the level of boob and hatch. I can't think of a worse diss.
Careful, hide your dad! 987 is probably on sniper duty looking to take out anyone who looks over the age of 70. Maybe we can send him to perch outside the Whitehouse?It’s irrelevant whose life he thinks is more valuable and it has no bearing on if masks work or not, the subject of the thread, we live in an advanced society and protecting the elderly or those who are in high risk health categories is an example of the quality of life we all are afforded.
It’s fully ignorant to try and argue otherwise like he attempted to do.
What’s an ignorant, selfish and uneducated argument to attempt to make is who we should gear our policies towards so they don’t have to take the smallest amount of caution in public.
Putting on a mask is not that difficult, If my almost 80 years old father with pre existing condition can wear one in public so can a 25 years old healthy person.
Selfish COVIDIOTS being what they are best at.
You simply don’t understand supply and demand and how value is determined.Math says that if creating more children is the goal and a man can sire hundreds of children but a woman can bear about a dozen at most, clearly the man is more valuable. Losing a woman means a dozen less children. Losing a man means a hundred less children.
Facepalm indeed. You are clueless.
ABCD amongst many things you also have very little understanding of the Coronavirus although it has been explained to 1,760,000,600 times.You simply don’t understand supply and demand and how value is determined.
Definitely done trying to explain it to you.
Hey, wait a minute. He's not in jail yet but hopefully soon since it's a federal charge. Maybe 987 is reallyABCD amongst many things you have very little understanding of the Coronavirus although it has been explained to 1,760,000,600 times.
Appreciate the compliment. 987 has a nice ring to it.Hey, wait a minute. He's not in jail yet but hopefully soon since it's a federal charge. Maybe 987 is really
![]()
UPDATE: Instagram photo with anti-mandatory masker subject of Toronto police standards probe
Chris Soccoccia, a.k.a. Chris Sky, was featured alongside smiling officers in @TPSNeighbourhoodWatch Instagram photowww.yorkregion.com
same arrogance. Plus if he knocks off his wealthy pops with COVID he stands to inherit a decent amount of wealth.
Keep on posting stupid crap.
LOL......yeah, putting a napkin over your face will stop us all from getting the virusKeep on posting stupid crap.
All masks including N95 filter airborne particles, they do not stop them. N95 by definition filters 95% of particles. Wearing masks (like vaccines) is about REDUCING the chances of infection spreading. Even wearing a paper napkin over your face will REDUCE the chances of catching or spreading the virus
If you knew anything about virology you'd know that antibodies arent the only marker by which you can measure someone's immunity.And sadly at the same time that you mask haters complain that masks aren't worthwhile because they don't completely stop the virus from spreading are often the same people claiming 20% of people having antibodies will give society herd immunity
Yes Putting any sort of a face covering over ones nose and mouth will significantly reduce one’s exposure to the Coronavirus.LOL......yeah, putting a napkin over your face will stop us all from getting the virus
Sweden is nowhere near reaching immunity. First you falsely tried to equate herd immunity with the relevance of the reduced numbers of death, which has no bearing on reaching herd immunity.If you knew anything about virology you'd know that antibodies arent the only marker by which you can measure someone's immunity.
There is also T-cell mediated immunity. And there's growing evidence Sweden might now have reached that point.
Here you go doggy, read and learn something: https://news.ki.se/immunity-to-covid-19-is-probably-higher-than-tests-have-shown
Just admit there's something in addition to antibodies called T-cell mediated immunity, which you didnt know.Yes Putting any sort of a face covering over ones nose and mouth will significantly reduce one’s exposure to the Coronavirus.
Sweden is nowhere near reaching immunity. First you falsely tried to equate herd immunity with the relevance of the reduced numbers of death, which has no bearing on reaching herd immunity.
Only someone who lacks knowledge in the subject would try to equate the two.
Herd immunity has to do with if the virus is still replicating and in Sweden it still is at a significant high level, and the rate it’s replicating at has been going higher.
In the last 3 days Sweden had 569 cases yesterday, 786 on October 6 and 375 cases on October 5th.
Their 7 day average has increased from 162 on September 1st to a whopping 528 as of yesterday October 7th.
Tell me again how close to herd immunity they are based on your non factual opinions.
Over 90% of Portuguese always wear a mask
Portugal reports more than 1,000 new coronavirus infections in 24 hours for first time in 6 months