Asian Sexy Babe
Toronto Escorts

Only Three Months Left For Planet Earth( and other false doomsday predictions)

Ginomore

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2011
967
381
63
The link states that they are working on the premise that it may have deliberately been started. There is no proof that it was started, and we have to wait and see. However, most fires are started by persons being dummies to throw their cigarette butts etc that then starts the fires. But fires are then brought under control irrespective with how they are started, and within a certain window of time. These Australians fires are unprecedented in the manner in which they have spread and the bone dry and very hot temperatures. They have spread at an alarming rate with no respite from the weather. There is absolutely zero proof that it is not due to the Climate Change, as it has been announced that these are the worst bush fires ever recorded and at this time of the year.

Australia broke its all-time temperature record twice in December. An average maximum of 40.9C was recorded on 17 December, broken a day later by 41.9C, both beating 2013's record of 40.3C.
By the end of the month every state had measured temperatures above 40C - including Tasmania, which is usually much cooler than the mainland.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J28cnAcPGXA
Your graph shows average temperature is calculated from 1961-1990.
That is the definition of cherry picking data.
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
; said:
The link states that they are working on the premise that it may have deliberately been started. There is no proof that it was started, and we have to wait and see. However, most fires are started by persons being dummies to throw their cigarette butts etc that then starts the fires. But fires are then brought under control irrespective with how they are started, and within a certain window of time. These Australians fires are unprecedented in the manner in which they have spread and the bone dry and very hot temperatures. They have spread at an alarming rate with no respite from the weather. There is absolutely zero proof that it is not due to the Climate Change, as it has been announced that these are the worst bush fires ever recorded and at this time of the year.

Australia broke its all-time temperature record twice in December. An average maximum of 40.9C was recorded on 17 December, broken a day later by 41.9C, both beating 2013's record of 40.3C.
By the end of the month every state had measured temperatures above 40C - including Tasmania, which is usually much cooler than the mainland.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J28cnAcPGXA

Your graph shows average temperature is calculated from 1961-1990.
That is the definition of cherry picking data.
Nice catch Ginomore on bever_hunter posting. Like usual climate alarmist are full of shit!
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,483
2,718
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Sydney police hunt arsonists who deliberately started bushfires threatening 100 homes on the city's hottest day ever as the mercury hit 49C

A manhunt is underway for vile arsonists who started several fires on Saturday
Fires at Georges Hall and Badgerys Creek in Sydney were started deliberately
The flames risked destroying more than 100 homes on the city's hottest day ever
A special strike force has since been set up to investigate and find the culprits

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-western-Sydney-hit-suburban-areas-TODAY.html
 

Gooseifur

Well-known member
Aug 13, 2019
3,812
430
83
Its not ozone, as even you note that fixing the ozone only resulted in .05 to .08ºC.
And we're still warming way faster than that, with 1.2ºC warming already.
So you're saying the ozone layer depletion has nothing to due with climate change?
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,711
3,869
113
In one post Frankie says earth has warmed 0.89 degrees Celsius, in the next he says its 1.2ºC.

And he wonders why people dont take him seriously :spit:
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
83,918
19,062
113
Your graph shows average temperature is calculated from 1961-1990.
That is the definition of cherry picking data.
That's not cherry picking, you totally don't understand the concept of cherry picking.
The has 110 years of temp data on it.
If the average temp was calculated from pre-industrial times or even just from 1910 at the start, it would show 1.5ºC warming.

How is that cherry picking?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
83,918
19,062
113
In one post Frankie says earth has warmed 0.89 degrees Celsius, in the next he says its 1.2ºC.

And he wonders why people dont take him seriously :spit:
WRONG!!!!!

I didn't use the number 0.89, phool.
As usual you can't even follow or understand the conversation and instead just made a phool of yourself again.
Phool.

:yo:


The question Canada Man refuses or can't answer:



In the 80's both Exxon and Shell's own internal scientists did their own oil funded research and they came up with the same predictions as the IPCC.
So how can those findings be biased?


Shell and Exxon's secret 1980s climate change warnings

Newly found documents from the 1980s show that fossil fuel companies privately predicted the global damage that would be caused by their products.

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...d-exxons-secret-1980s-climate-change-warnings

 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,483
2,718
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
The History Of The Arctic


In the distant past, palm trees grew in Greenland.




The Arctic Ocean is believed to have been ice-free around the time Stonehenge was built, with atmospheric CO2 at pre-industrial levels.

Less Ice In Arctic Ocean 6000-7000 Years Ago

Date:
October 20, 2008
Source:
Geological Survey of Norway
Summary:
Recent mapping of a number of raised beach ridges on the north coast of Greenland suggests that the ice cover in the Arctic Ocean was greatly reduced some 6000-7000 years ago. The Arctic Ocean may have been periodically ice free.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081020095850.htm


Hannibal took elephants across the Alps in 181 BC.


It is also known that the Arctic was much warmer one thousand years ago, with atmospheric CO2 at pre-industrial levels. Then the Arctic got much colder and the Vikings in Greenland froze to death.



https://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F20A12F63F5D167A93C0AB178AD85F408385F9

The 1990 IPCC report recognized the warmth of 1,000 years ago, and subsequent cooling into the 17th century. This was called the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age.


photo signature free

https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/far/wg_I/ipcc_far_wg_I_chapter_07.pdf

Glaciers in the Aps were either small or non-existent one thousand years ago.


photo signature free

https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/94383187/8944831
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
83,918
19,062
113
The History Of The Arctic


In the distant past, palm trees grew in Greenland.
Yes, that's what happened when the planet hit a thermal maximum previously.
So why do you keep pushing for another one?

The question Canada Man refuses or can't answer:



In the 80's both Exxon and Shell's own internal scientists did their own oil funded research and they came up with the same predictions as the IPCC.
So how can those findings be biased?


Shell and Exxon's secret 1980s climate change warnings

Newly found documents from the 1980s show that fossil fuel companies privately predicted the global damage that would be caused by their products.

https://www.theguardian.com/environ...d-exxons-secret-1980s-climate-change-warnings

 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,483
2,718
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
83,918
19,062
113
Elderly man, 79, is charged with intentionally lighting blazes as Australia grapples with bushfire crisis
]
Sydney was the hottest place on earth at 48.9ºC.
You think an old man was more responsible for the rash of fires?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,713
5,848
113
Your graph shows average temperature is calculated from 1961-1990.
That is the definition of cherry picking data.
This is not my "Cherry Picking", as it is an official graph from the Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology, okay?? So let's say that you want to work out the average from 1910, then think about it. That will make the average temperatures even LOWER, so that the warm up will look even worse. Okay!!

I know that you are nitpicking to try and help the ones like pornaddict who just uses online Climate Change Deniers Fake Data on a constant 24/7 basis!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,713
5,848
113
That's not cherry picking, you totally don't understand the concept of cherry picking.
The has 110 years of temp data on it.
If the average temp was calculated from pre-industrial times or even just from 1910 at the start, it would show 1.5ºC warming.

How is that cherry picking?
Absolutely true, and then pornaddict who really is brainwashed with all these online Climate Change Deniers Conspiracy Theories then throws his two cents in without even thinking about the mathematics behind that statement of his!!
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
As usual you are full of crap, and that is all you offer being a Climate Change Denier!!
As usual your full of shit!! Your the one brainwash in pseudoscience of climate change ( aka global warming), I look it the pro and cons of global warming ( rebranded as climate change) and realized in all pseudoscience. I used to believe passionately about global warming until ... I looked at both pro and cons of global warming and came to a conclusion is pseudoscience.
Just like this famous Nobel prize winning scientist also came to the same conclusion also, Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is "Dead Wrong".
This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.
The 2015 speech by Prof Giaever is here
Here the link -->. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM

All the the computer model of climate change have been incorrectly wrong or been cherry picked and or adjusted to fit the model. All the climate change prediction like Arctic ice cap will be ice free in the summer by 2013 then moved the goal post 2014 or part of Manhattan will be underwater by 2015 or Maldives island will be underwater by 2018 . All their prediction is incorrect and none of it come true.


Climate alarmist always moved the goal post when none of their prediction come true.
Like above post world will come to end on 2020 and now they moved the goal post to 2030.. Then when that predict don't come true they will moved the goal post further in the future.
So have the Arctic Ocean ( North Pole ) became ice free yet!!!

You are full of shit! Open your eyes!! Look at the pro & cons and then make up your own mind!!
Hubris of climate alarmist scientists will destroy mankind trust in science. Science is base on facts not cherry picking or pseudoscience like this famous Nobel scientist ( "Professor Ivar Giaever") said.




PS. In the past I learned how Wall Street lies & and bond agencies helped created fraud they rated mortage as AAA and bank lend money/ mortage to people who had no jobs or income which caused the last Great Recession in 2008 in USA and crashed the housing. That why I always look at the pro and cons of both arguments and then make my conclusion.

PPS Are you fucking blinded by the politics !!! Left vs right politics! I think it very sad and extremely disturbing that science have been hijacked by politics!!
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
83,918
19,062
113
As usual your full of shit!! Your the one brainwash in pseudoscience of climate change ( aka global warming), I look it the pro and cons of global warming ( rebranded as climate change) and realized in all pseudoscience. I used to believe passionately about global warming until ... I looked at both pro and cons of global warming and came to a conclusion is pseudoscience.
!
Do you and Canada Man get special hats for your anti-science cult meetings?
Do you compare who to see who can find the one crackpot source that's never seen the light of day?

Have you convinced Canada Man to never use vaccines?
Has Canada Man convinced you that only he knows the 9/11 true story?
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
0
36
60
Do you and Canada Man get special hats for your anti-science cult meetings?
Do you compare who to see who can find the one crackpot source that's never seen the light of day?

Have you convinced Canada Man to never use vaccines?
Has Canada Man convinced you that only he knows the 9/11 true story?
You are full of shit! I begin to believe that you have a conflict of interest when come to global warming.
I believe in the science of vaccines!
I believe that Iraq war by Bush / mainstream media was wrong and help pushed the fake WMD lied to the public and help shaped the public opinion for the war in IRaQ.
9/11 was caused and plan by Osama bin laden and he even told credit for it!
I believe when IRan when elected democratic by the people IRAN in 1953 and then the CIA overthrow the elected democratic government and help install shah of Iran was wrong !!! Also believed the present day IRan government is evil also!
Also believe Israel and PLO parties both have blood in their hand and both parties are arch enemy of each other and will both never make peace! The only way the PLO and Israel will have peace is when one of them kill all of them of!! That the sad truth !!

Unfortunately in today world whoever is stronger will always be right and that If the shoe happen the to be the end each parties will treated each no different to each other. Might make is right" .


The first commonly quoted use of “might makes right” in English was in 1846 by the American pacifist and abolitionist Adin Ballou (1803–1890), who wrote, "But now, instead of discussion and argument, brute force rises up to the rescue of discomfited error, and crushes truth and right into the dust.

The old saying " MIght is right " make it that that the flaw of human nature.

PS i believe you also hate the Israel/ Jews and the USA ... which you may have a valid reason for your hatred!
and you support palestine's right but you also will have no compassion if Israel was push into the sea and cease to exists if they had lost war with Egypt ( Arab world) also.

PPS Both Jew & Muslim parties have blood in their hands!! Their historic conflict will always influence the present and the future and that war will never end until one parties is dead!
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,483
2,718
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Bushfires: Firebugs fuelling crisis as arson arrest toll hits 183

More than 180 alleged arsonists have been arrested since the start of the bushfire season, with 29 blazes deliberately lit in the Shoalhaven region of southeast NSW in just three months.

The Shoalhaven fires were lit between July and September last year, with Kempsey recording 27 deliberately lit fires, NSW Bureau of Crime and Statistics and Research data shows.

Police arrested 183 people for lighting bushfires across Queensland, NSW, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania in the past few months. NSW police data shows 183 people have been charged or cautioned for bushfire-related offences since November 8, and 24 arrested for deliberately starting bushfires.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/na...3/news-story/52536dc9ca9bb87b7c76d36ed1acf53f
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts