Toronto Passions

Rising seas: 'Florida is about to be wiped off the map'

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Rising seas: 'Florida is about to be wiped off the map'

Sea level rises are not some distant threat; for many Americans they are very real. In an extract from her chilling new book, Rising, Elizabeth Rush details how the US coastline will be radically transformed in the coming years

Elizabeth Rush

Tue 26 Jun 2018 12.37 BST

Last modified on Wed 27 Jun 2018 00.52 BST

In 1890, just over six thousand people lived in the damp lowlands of south Florida. Since then the wetlands that covered half the state have been largely drained, strip malls have replaced Seminole camps, and the population has increased a thousandfold. Over roughly the same amount of time the number of black college degree holders in the United States also increased a thousandfold, as did the speed at which we fly, the combined carbon emissions of the Middle East, and the entire population of Thailand.

About 60 of the region’s more than 6 million residents have gathered in the Cox Science Building at the University of Miami on a sunny Saturday morning in 2016 to hear Harold Wanless, or Hal, chair of the geology department, speak about sea level rise. “Only 7% of the heat being trapped by greenhouse gases is stored in the atmosphere,” Hal begins. “Do you know where the other 93% lives?”

A teenager, wrists lined in aquamarine beaded bracelets, rubs sleep from her eyes. Returns her head to its resting position in her palm. The man seated behind me roots around in his briefcase for a breakfast bar. No one raises a hand.

“In the ocean,” Hal continues. “That heat is expanding the ocean, which is contributing to sea level rise, and it is also, more importantly, creating the setting for something we really don’t want to have happen: rapid melt of ice.”

A woman wearing a sequined teal top opens her Five Star notebook and starts writing things down. The guy behind her shovels spoonfuls of passionfruit–flavored Chobani yogurt into his tiny mouth. Hal’s three sons are perched in the next row back. One has a ponytail, one is in a suit, and the third crosses and uncrosses his gray street sneakers. The one with the ponytail brought a water bottle; the other two sip Starbucks. And behind the rows and rows of sparsely occupied seats, at the very back of the amphitheater, an older woman with a gold brocade bear on her top paces back and forth.

A real estate developer interrupts Hal to ask: “Is someone recording this?”

“Yes.” The cameraman coughs. “Besides,” Hal adds, “I say the same damn thing at least five times a week.” Hal, who is in his early seventies and has been studying sea level rise for over 40 years, pulls at his Burt Reynolds moustache, readjusts his taupe corduroy suit, and continues. On the screen above his head clips from a documentary on climate change show glacial tongues of ice the size of Manhattan tumbling into the sea. “The big story in Greenland and Antarctica is that the warming ocean is working its way in, deep under the ice sheets, causing the ice to collapse faster than anyone predicted, which in turn will cause sea levels to rise faster than anyone predicted.”

According to Marco Rubio, the junior senator from Florida, rising sea levels are uncertain, their connection to human activity tenuous. And yet the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change expects roughly two feet of rise by century’s end. The United Nations predicts three feet. And the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration estimates an upper limit of six and a half feet.

Take the 6 million people who live in south Florida today and divide them into two groups: those who live less than six and a half feet above the current high tide line, and everybody else. The numbers slice nearly evenly. Heads or tails: call it in the air. If you live here, all you can do is hope that when you put down roots your choice was somehow prophetic.

But Hal says it doesn’t matter whether you live six feet above sea level or sixty-five, because he, like James Hansen, believes that all of these predictions are, to put it mildly, very, very low. “The rate of sea level rise is currently doubling every seven years, and if it were to continue in this manner, Ponzi scheme style, we would have 205 feet of sea level rise by 2095,” he says. “And while I don’t think we are going to get that much water by the end of the century, I do think we have to take seriously the possibility that we could have something like 15 feet by then.”

It’s a little after nine o’clock. Hal’s sons stop sipping their lattes and the oceanographic scientist behind me puts down his handful of M&M’s. If Hal Wanless is right, every single object I have seen over the past 72 hours – the periodic table of elements hanging above his left shoulder, the buffet currently loaded with refreshments, the smoothie stand at my seaside hotel, the beach umbrellas and oxygen bars, the Johnny Rockets and seashell shop, the lecture hall with its hundreds of mostly empty teal swivel chairs – will all be underwater in the not-so-distant future.

One of the few stories I remember from the Bible vividly depicts the natural and social world in crisis. It is the apocalyptic narrative par excellence – Noah’s flood. When I look it up again, however, I am surprised to find that it does not start with a rainstorm or an ark, but earlier, with unprecedented population growth and God’s scorn. It begins: “When human beings began to increase in number on the earth.” I read this line and think about the 6,000 inhabitants of south Florida turning into 6 million in 120 short years. “The LORD saw how great the wickedness of the human race had become.” I think about the exponential increase in M&M’s, Chobani yogurt cups and grande lattes consumed over that same span of time. The dizzying supply chains, cheap labor and indestructible plastic. “So God said to Noah, ‘I am going to put an end to all people, for the earth is filled with violence because of them.’” And then the rain began.

I do not believe in a vengeful God – if God exists at all – so I do not think of the flood as punishment for human sin. What interests me most is what happens to the story when I remove it from its religious framework: Noah’s flood is one of the most fully developed accounts of environmental change in ancient history. It tries to make sense of a cataclysmic earthbound event that happened long ago, before written language, before the domestication of horses, before the first Egyptian mummies and the rise of civilization in Crete. An event for which the teller clearly held humans responsible.

Dig into geologic history and you discover this: when sea levels have risen in the past, they have usually not done so gradually, but rather in rapid surges, jumping as much as 50 feet over a short three centuries. Scientists call these events “meltwater pulses” because the near-biblical rise in the height of the ocean is directly correlated to the melting of ice and the process of deglaciation, the very events featured in the documentary footage Hal has got running on a screen above his head.

He shows us a clip of the largest glacial calving event ever recorded. It starts with a chunk of ice the size of Miami’s tallest building tumbling, head over tail, off the tip of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Then the Southeast Financial Center goes, displaying its cool blue underbelly. It is a coltish thing, smooth and oddly muscular. The ground between the two turns to arctic ice dust and the ocean roils up. Next, chunks of ice the size of the Marquis Residences crash away; then the Wells Fargo Center falls, and with it goes 900 Biscayne Bay. Suddenly everything between the Brickell neighborhood and Park West is gone.

The clip begins again and I watch in awe as a section of the Jakobshavn Glacier half the size of all Miami falls into the sea.

“Greenland is currently calving chunks of ice so massive they produce earthquakes up to six and seven on the Richter scale,” Hal says as the city of ice breaks apart. “There was not much noticeable ice melt before the nineties. But now it accelerates every year, exceeding all predictions. It will likely cause a pulse of meltwater into the oceans.”

In medicine, a pulse is something regular – a predictable throb of blood through veins, produced by a beating heart. It is so reliable, so steady, so definite that lack of a pulse is sometimes considered synonymous with death. A healthy adult will have a resting heart rate of 60 to 100 beats per minute, every day, until they don’t. But a meltwater pulse is the opposite. It is an anomaly. The exception to the 15,000-year rule.

From 1900 to 2000 the glacier on the screen retreated inward eight miles. From 2001 to 2010 it pulled back nine more; over a single decade the Jakobshavn glacier lost more ice than it had during the previous century. And then there is this film clip, recorded over 70 minutes, in which the glacier retreats a full mile across a calving face three miles wide. “This is why I believe we are witnessing the beginning of the largest meltwater pulse in modern human history,” Hal says.

As the ice sheets above Hal’s head fall away and the snacks on the buffet disappear, topography is transformed from a backwater physical science into the single most important factor determining the longevity of the Sunshine State. The man seated next to me leans over. “If what he says is even half true,” he whispers, “Florida is about to be wiped off the map.”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jun/26/rising-seas-florida-climate-change-elizabeth-rush
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,697
21
38
That's what you get for building on swamp land.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,555
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com

managee

Banned
Jun 19, 2013
1,731
3
0
“About to be wiped off the map” is probably only apt from a geological “time” perspective. I might even say it’s alarmist. You’re probably still safe for a few decades if the property you have your eyes is actually abutting the ocean. But that’s well out of my price range.

As the article pointed out, what’s difficult to predict is the massive influxes in (northern) ice cap melt. Some years it’s only a little, most it’s more than predicted. Ice sheets may even increase in size, but that doesn’t do much to stem the annual

With certainty, unless manmade obstacles are created to prevent oceanic rise, that $22 million is probably a relatively a short-term investment. The assumption that the best indicator of economic (let alone environmental) impact of climate change is real estate pricing is absurd, and probably the fantasy of unscrupulous speculation.

I’ve spent weeks living on two different islands that have disappeared in the past 10 years - Islands that have been habitated for at-least 200 years (one was 600 years). Storm surge severity, and increasing frequency wiped them out, no-doubt a phenomena that Florida Keys residents are keenly aware of.

It’s no longer a question of “if” but “when.”
 

Insidious Von

My head is my home
Sep 12, 2007
39,725
7,250
113
Miami could be more vulnerable than New Orleans.

Large scale fracking will slow down the flow of Mississippi River, that could be a saving grace for New Orleans. After Hurricane Katrina they stopped building on the Bayou Peninsula. They are attempting to return the area to it's natural state but mangrove forests are slow growth. Whether they'll provide enough protection to the city against future storms remains to be seen. Miami Beach is almost completely developed, which means they'll have to build dykes around it to stop it from going underwater. Buildings are not good buffers, a hurricane that hits it square will do more damage than NYC/NJ. Even worse if a Houston type hurricane hits. So far only Virginia Key has been left wild, it sits parallel to downtown Miami. It may not provide enough protection if a hurricane hits bull's eye.

https://therealdeal.com/miami/2016/04/07/miami-beach-property-values-may-fall-as-sea-levels-rise-experts/
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,840
113
Yep, Florida will suffer the faith of Manhattan. It too will disappear under the waves.
 

1.8t

Member
Aug 22, 2009
44
2
8
North Pole ice cap melting will not increase sea level. The ice is already floating on the sea.
 

dickydoem

Area 51 Escapee
Apr 15, 2003
1,179
65
48
Stuck in Lodi again
I think that there are many factors involved in climate change, but if indeed carbon is a prime factor then the people of Florida have contributed greatly to their own state's demise. Swamps and wetlands are considered carbon sinks and by draining and filling in vast areas of these, huge amounts of carbon have been released into the atmosphere as well as future storage potential has vanished. Actions have consequences.
 

renuck

New member
May 12, 2017
374
2
0
“About to be wiped off the map” is probably only apt from a geological “time” perspective. I might even say it’s alarmist. You’re probably still safe for a few decades if the property you have your eyes is actually abutting the ocean. But that’s well out of my price range.
Yup. Florida is going down. The entire pacific rim is going to sink. The New England states are going to be an active volcano range. Australia is on a collision course with Japan. Looks like we might even have a Pangaea II. Just normal plate tectonics, been going on long before we got here. Nothing we need to worry about in our life time.
 

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,489
11
38
Yup. Florida is going down. The entire pacific rim is going to sink. The New England states are going to be an active volcano range. Australia is on a collision course with Japan. Looks like we might even have a Pangaea II. Just normal plate tectonics, been going on long before we got here. Nothing we need to worry about in our life time.
However, water rises a lot faster than that, and they'll already be re-drawing the maps by the time the waves are merely threatening I95, even if taking the whole state off the map is still decades away.

Anyway, as to that, it has already shrunk a lot, due to ice-melt, since the first snowbirds started visiting.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,679
21,825
113
However, water rises a lot faster than that, and they'll already be re-drawing the maps by the time the waves are merely threatening I95, even if taking the whole state off the map is still decades away.

Anyway, as to that, it has already shrunk a lot, due to ice-melt, since the first snowbirds started visiting.

Nice map, though Phil will say its not accurate since it depicts times older then 100 years.
Just saw this, a live ticker on CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere.



Almost as scary as the one that details the amount of CO2 we've put into the atmosphere.

 

Occasionally

Active member
May 22, 2011
2,928
7
38
Coastal cities will be wiped out...... in the year 1,000,000.

I'm still waiting for all those articles from decades ago about that Pacific Rim thing where all the ocean floor volcanos are supposed to erupt wrecking havoc on Tokyo and San Francisco.
 

nobody123

serial onanist
Feb 1, 2012
3,568
5
38
nowhere
Coastal cities will be wiped out...... in the year 1,000,000.

I'm still waiting for all those articles from decades ago about that Pacific Rim thing where all the ocean floor volcanos are supposed to erupt wrecking havoc on Tokyo and San Francisco.
It's the sensationalist crap that people remember and sink their teeth into. The more or less universal scientific consensus (using rigorous, repeatable, and peer-reviewed research & analysis) that we are slowly, inexorably facing some major fucking hard times that are still decades away isn't sexy and won't sell papers, but should worry the shit out of rational people none the less. We're the frog in the pot, and the water feels just fine, doughnut?
 

kkelso

Well-known member
Apr 27, 2003
2,470
28
48
It's the sensationalist crap that people remember and sink their teeth into. The more or less universal scientific consensus (using rigorous, repeatable, and peer-reviewed research & analysis) that we are slowly, inexorably facing some major fucking hard times that are still decades away isn't sexy and won't sell papers, but should worry the shit out of rational people none the less. We're the frog in the pot, and the water feels just fine, doughnut?
The boiling frog is a myth. Along with lots of other stuff.

KK
 

kkelso

Well-known member
Apr 27, 2003
2,470
28
48
Way to take a metaphor literally. Bravo.
I understand the metaphor perfectly, thank you. My point, and I suppose I should make it more clearly, is that like the "boiling frog" myth (that I used to believe btw) there are a great many things that get said over and over again that we accept as true, but that aren't.

I interviewed a woman last week who had just graduated with a Masters from Columbia. During the interview we got to chatting about environmentalism and the actions that a company could take to be more environmentally responsible. She's very bright, well-spoken, and passionate - it was a delightful conversation.

During the talk she kept returning to the topic of "an island of garbage the size of Texas floating in the Pacific ocean". She said that you could walk on it, and that there were videos of the island taken from aircraft.

I'd never heard of an island made of garbage, and was disgusted and concerned at what she had told me, so naturally I searched on it later that day. Turns out it doesn't exist.

https://response.restoration.noaa.g...at-pacific-garbage-patch-science-vs-myth.html

There are zones where garbage tends to collect, plastics break down into micro-particles, and that's an issue. But to say "there's an island of garbage the size of Texas" is at best a 100x misinterpretation of the facts, and at worst a useful lie.

The thing is, this smart young woman had heard the lie stated as fact so often and consistently that she treated it as the truth. In a debate about environment, statements like 'Florida is about to be wiped off the map' don't help solve the problem. They make environmentalists look stupid, and give more ammunition to deniers.

KK
 

nobody123

serial onanist
Feb 1, 2012
3,568
5
38
nowhere
In a debate about environment, statements like 'Florida is about to be wiped off the map' don't help solve the problem. They make environmentalists look stupid, and give more ammunition to deniers
...which is PRECISELY why I pointed out that the sensationalist crap is crap, and that change is occurring on a subjectively gradual timescale. You know, like a frog in a .... oh nevermind!
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts