Allegra Escorts Collective

Rising seas: 'Florida is about to be wiped off the map'

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,942
2,887
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
wattsupwiththat is the single worst denier site, if you're reading and believing that garbage you're confirmed to be pretty hopeless.
That means you believe in all kinds of weird conspiracy theories, possible aliens and really have no clue over what to believe.

By the way, do you know moviefan, I think you two would really get along.
wattsupwiththat get information from other sources.


http://www.eturbonews.com/44420/mount-kilimanjaro-glaciers-nowhere-near-extinction
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,679
21,825
113
Don't believe in alien!!
Don't believe Weird conspiracy theories!!! Don't believe 9/11 conspiracy .
Don't believe in Elvis is alive or Don't believe JFK conspiracy!!
Only believes that man made climate change ( aka global warming) has got the the science wrong!!
Only believe that Ontario cap & trade is a tax grab by liberal goverment!
Science is run on Facts and proof not on consensus . Noted that a proof is a proof
A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven.

I believe that hubris in majority of climate scientists like Mann ( hockey stick graph).Examples are poor science, biased scientific data to actual blatant data cherry-picking and data manipulation. These issues are known to those who have researched the subject but apparently not too well known to the public at large or even to most of the IPCC delegates.

Among other the inherent problems associated with computer models that have been used as “scientific data”, the important role of clouds and water vapor in negating the importance of anthropogenic carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and the importance of satellite data that do not show warming of the troposphere, just to name a few of the myriad of facts that are detailed. climate system are too complex and too chaotic and climatogist got the science wrong .


And man made climate change or so call global warming is not proven!!
Note is called a global warming theory until that is 100.00% proven then it is only a theory until is proven otherwise is only a theory.
HA HA ... Trump also killed Man made climate change.
Ha ha ...Doug Ford killed Cap & Trade !!
Alberta Jason Kenndy will kill Carbon tax or Cap & Trade next when he get elected next year !,
TRudeau will be next too!! He going to lose to the Supreme Court of Canada when comes to Cap & Trade or Carbon Tax. And he will lose on the next fed election!

Like usual your fool of shit!!
As proven by John Lauren on previous debate with you on man climate changes / global warming!!
Also proven by movie time that you lost your bet to movie time.
Anthony Watts, total clown.
Blogger Anthony Watts
Willard Anthony Watts (Anthony Watts) is a blogger, weathercaster and non-scientist, paid AGW denier who runs the website wattsupwiththat.com. He does not have a university qualification and has no climate credentials other than being a radio weather announcer. His website is parodied and debunked at the website wottsupwiththat.com Watts is on the payroll of the Heartland Institute, which itself is funded by polluting industries.[1]
He's paid by the Heartland Institute and is not a scientist.

You're better off reading this.
https://wottsupwiththat.com/
 

PornAddict

Active member
Aug 30, 2009
3,620
2
36
60
You're better off reading this.
https://wottsupwiththat.com/
This is a useless website !!

https://wottsupwiththatblog.wordpress.com/about/

About Me
For the moment, I’ve decided to remain anonymous. I don’t really know why. No particularly good reason and I certainly don’t intend to use my anonymity to attack those who are not. I am not a climate scientist, but am a professional and active scientist who teaches and carries out research at a university – regarded by some – as amongst the best in the world. The views I express here are my own and not those of my employer.

As far as the name of the blog is concerned, it was clearly chosen to indicate that a goal is to address climate science claims made on Anthony Watts’s Watts Up With That (WUWT) site. I say “address” because the goal isn’t to simply refute what is said on WUWT. I will happily acknowledge contributions there that add positive and realise that the name of this site is somewhat similar to that. Hopefully they will recognise imitation as being the sincerest form of flattery but, if not, they are welcome to let me know. If for some reason anyone would like to get in touch with me, I can be contacted on wottsupwiththatblog@gmail.com.

PS. An anonymous active scientists who receives funding from governments in term of miliions of dollar in grants money from governments ! Scientists in university receives or funded from government grant money from that obviously shows a biases !

Therefore your site is a useless piece of shits! This person chooses to remains anonymous not like Anthony watts who chosen to remain not anonymous and can be open himself to attack vs your useless site who hid behind anonymity so he cannot be attack! What a chicken shit this person is!
You should ponder this !! climate alarmists lose the battle and have to resort to copy successful skeptic websites.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,700
4,767
113
Its a website dedicated to showing how stupid Watts and his site is.
Of course you prefer some uneducated blogger to science posted at NASA or IPCC, you really don't know the difference, do you?
Frankie, are you saying NASA and IPCC can never be wrong about global warming??
Is that what you're saying?? They are 100% right on this??
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,183
7,808
113
Room 112
Anthony Watts, total clown.


He's paid by the Heartland Institute and is not a scientist.

You're better off reading this.
https://wottsupwiththat.com/
Stop with the alarmist propaganda nonsense. If he was paid by Heartland it would only have been to present at a conference. Looking at their 2015 financials total conference and seminar fees were a grand total of $437K. Given that there are literally dozens of speakers who present at the various conferences (they also have conferences related to healthcare, taxes, the economy and constitutional reform) the amount Watts would have been paid is negligible. More liberal obfuscation.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,679
21,825
113
Frankie, are you saying NASA and IPCC can never be wrong about global warming??
Is that what you're saying?? They are 100% right on this??
Don't be an idiot, Phil.

Nobody is 100% right (well, other then me).
Read the IPCC reports and you'll notes that projections are given with ranges and confidence levels.
Fortunately they've been working on this for many decades and you can read the most solid results filtered through peer assessments and finally the IPCC committees.

Compare that to wattsupwiththat, which is one oil funded blogger and a crowd of wingnuts.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
90,679
21,825
113
Stop with the alarmist propaganda nonsense. If he was paid by Heartland it would only have been to present at a conference. Looking at their 2015 financials total conference and seminar fees were a grand total of $437K. Given that there are literally dozens of speakers who present at the various conferences (they also have conferences related to healthcare, taxes, the economy and constitutional reform) the amount Watts would have been paid is negligible. More liberal obfuscation.

No, if Watts takes money from Heartland then he's taking money from the oil industry lobbyists.
Doesn't matter how much, if he takes any that marks him as a biased and paid lobbyist.
 

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,478
861
113
World's greatest sea level expert:


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment...sea-levels-is-the-greatest-lie-ever-told.html


Rise of sea levels is 'the greatest lie ever told'

The uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story, writes Christopher Booker.







Christopher Booker

6:25PM GMT 28 Mar 2009





If one thing more than any other is used to justify proposals that the world must spend tens of trillions of dollars on combating global warming, it is the belief that we face a disastrous rise in sea levels. The Antarctic and Greenland ice caps will melt, we are told, warming oceans will expand, and the result will be catastrophe.


Although the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) only predicts a sea level rise of 59cm (17 inches) by 2100, Al Gore in his Oscar-winning film An Inconvenient Truth went much further, talking of 20 feet, and showing computer graphics of cities such as Shanghai and San Francisco half under water. We all know the graphic showing central London in similar plight. As for tiny island nations such as the Maldives and Tuvalu, as Prince Charles likes to tell us and the Archbishop of Canterbury was again parroting last week, they are due to vanish.


But if there is one scientist who knows more about sea levels than anyone else in the world it is the Swedish geologist and physicist Nils-Axel Mörner, formerly chairman of the INQUA International Commission on Sea Level Change. And the uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner, who for 35 years has been using every known scientific method to study sea levels all over the globe, is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story.


Despite fluctuations down as well as up, "the sea is not rising," he says. "It hasn't risen in 50 years." If there is any rise this century it will "not be more than 10cm (four inches), with an uncertainty of plus or minus 10cm". And quite apart from examining the hard evidence, he says, the elementary laws of physics (latent heat needed to melt ice) tell us that the apocalypse conjured up by
Al Gore and Co could not possibly come about.


The reason why Dr Mörner, formerly a Stockholm professor, is so certain that these claims about sea level rise are 100 per cent wrong is that they are all based on computer model predictions, whereas his findings are based on "going into the field to observe what is actually happening in the real world".
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
27,183
7,808
113
Room 112

barnacler

Well-known member
May 13, 2013
1,478
861
113
Toronto Escorts