I really wish I hadn't used BBBJ as an example, it seems the focus on menu/YMMV cannot be shaken. What if I want to know if you're open to dancing with me to set the mood....no dancing, no booking as I would like to dance. Am I still a disgusting menu-seeking women-objectifying misogynist that can't see women as people? You know, despite the fact I was raised solely by women and have a daughter of my own....For the OP I believe some of the ladies ads or websites he has come across probably aren't marketing to his type of expectations or demeanour. Some guys really don't get that we are not a car wash that every single person who contacts us is entitled to the same service for a set price. There are all kinds of providers who offer all kinds of services and market in all kinds of ways.
If you truly expect to be paying for services only and demand said services - then simply book providers who advertise such services and consistently have the same services mentioned in reviews.
Some ad boards after C36 refused to let escorts advertise if they had any sexual menus on their website. It's not AS strictly enforced maybe now, but still some of us adhere to it and don't mention every single menu item for that reason. Some of us also don't mention a menu because we hate being asked "hey babe what's the menu" and talked to in such terms. I really don't want to see any client who thinks he's seeing me for my services only and not to spend time with me. Some of you are kidding yourselves if you think no guy is wanting to see us just to talk, or get a massage, or just cuddle us, or take us to dinner or a museum. Some of us really are companions and are not just sex dolls so when we say we are being paid for time and companionship only we mean it. Some of my clients really do just book social time, some want some attention/affection but don't want to cheat or are simply terrified of STDs so they don't engage in any oral or full service.
I am not a YMMV provider personally, despite some gents having ok or pretty bad hygiene I still treat them with respect and attempt to be consistent with everyone because that's just me. I don't like to chastise a client and threaten or throw them out, and I do a pretty good job of only taking on bookings where I think the client and I will get on well. Some people naturally just have an aroma, some don't know how to clean in their foreskin. Some of the hobbyists who are big time reviewers you would laugh if you found out how bad their hygiene is. Some of the guys on here swear up and down they are always fresh and don't get whey they don't get a BBBJ. Many think they are fresh and simply are not - I'm sure the same goes for some SPs. The perception and the reality is quite different.
Personally I'm not interested in booking clients who are menu oriented and absolutely insist that I painstakingly list every single thing I do and will not do - this is a buzz kill and doesn't make me want to see them. If someone sends me a polite inquiry WITH screening info and asks I just wanted to know is bbbj something you offer? Then yes I will be inclined to politely respond yes. The approach really matters, and if you have multiple menu item demands, high expectations or any entitlement you will find some of the SPs you contact simply aren't interested. For example one terb guy contacted me and said after several emails he wanted to be sure I was "true gfe" I asked what that meant and he said "True GFE" is when you swallow, my gf has always done that and I only book escorts who swallow or that's not true gfe. I laughed and said no and he wasn't interested. No loss for me.
Everyone has things they're looking for in their session with an SP, and you will likely find someone who offers what you want. But there's no sense in trying to shit all over people who say they offer companionship only or don't have a menu. They're not for you and don't want your particular business and design their website/ad in that way. Move on. You're a time waster when you knowingly contact a lady to push and pry for info with no real intention of booking, or annoy her to the point she doesn't want to see you anymore with many or rude questions.
To the op Cristy and Sweetiepie are 2 completely different people. Cristy is a Caerf member and on twitter and doesn't talk here as far as I know.
Yeah, I agree, some guys do book for non-sexual reasons, but if that were the vast majority of cases then I doubt LE would be a concern, and I highly, highly doubt those who only want companionship are anywhere near the majority of bookings, could be wrong of course but I doubt it. However, even for those guys who don't partake in the sexual services, if they paid the price, they could have, so it was still on offer and technically part of the agreement, so it was paid for, and not just your time....but that doesn't preclude your right to refuse any services that were on offer prior to meeting. YMMV as always.
This is just in general, not directed at your Charlotte, but it seems I've been pegged as someone who only wants a menu.....funny as I've not partaken in anything extra except for SW when seeing girls who have quite extensive menus. I didn't even do greek when it was "on the house"......but yeah, just after a menu. I also care about your intellectual capacity and conversational skills because it's all about the menu. I book 1.5hours and am sexual for maybe 45mins-1hr, but yeah, just about the menu, not the connection. When asked what I want/like, I just shrug and say whatever you'd like to do, but just a menu seeker. I wonder....if it's really just about services or a menu, then shouldn't every girl who performs the service I want be an automatic regular? I've not repeated once, so I guess other things do matter, like the genuine connection we have. I'm about to respond to Amber but I'll still throw this in here, her sexual skills are/were top notch, but age gap made the connection meh, not horrible just not good. Would I have eventually repeated? Yeah, sure (obviously not anymore). But would she have ever been a regular? No. On the contrary, another lady whose sexual skills weren't as good as Amber's (but still great), but the connection was there, I plan to repeat if I'm not ostracized because of this thread lolol. I could continue but at this point it seems quite futile.
Thanks for your response Charlotte, seriously. I wonder if perhaps you will respond with the dancing example in mind, if that changes anything for you. If not, so be it, I'll take your answer as don't ask just wait and see - simply because I don't trust reviews to be gospel and am taking a huge risk by asking anything, about anything, from anyone.
For what it's worth, the questions I want to ask are simply how many shots in the time, and do you like to dance (honestly). I also like to tell the lady to take the lead, I like confident assertive women at first and once we're comfortable with each other I'm willing to become more dominant, but I want her to lead and initiate the activities. If I remember correctly, when booking with Candy Cane and discussing FF DT and Greek, I said, "these are some things I would like to do but when, how, or if they happen is upto you", verbatim......what a monster, I'm such a demon....