I see, so your model of peace talks is capitulation and surrender, then talks.Until Hamas lay down their arms and try to find a peaceful solution, then yes I am
And until then apartheid.
That would make you possibly worse then Hamas.
I see, so your model of peace talks is capitulation and surrender, then talks.Until Hamas lay down their arms and try to find a peaceful solution, then yes I am
I don't careI see, so your model of peace talks is capitulation and surrender, then talks.
And until then apartheid.
That would make you possibly worse then Hamas
Until I call you an evil racist for supporting apartheid and being perhaps more evil then Hamas.I don't care
I think you're an anti-semite masquerading as some champion of Palestinian rights, which everyone on this forum knows is total bullshitUntil I call you an evil racist for supporting apartheid and being perhaps more evil then Hamas.
Then you went and tried to call in the mods, who apparently didn't find anything wrong with me calling you evil for supporting apartheid
Of coarse the goal has nothing to do with Palestinian rights,... but simply the destruction of Israel.I think you're an anti-semite masquerading as some champion of Palestinian rights, which everyone on this forum knows is total bullshit
Tell that to IJV.I think you're an anti-semite masquerading as some champion of Palestinian rights, which everyone on this forum knows is total bullshit
Self defense means stopping people who are actively trying to harm you. It does not include attacking random people because of their religion and it doesn't even include attacking police.Are you trying to claim that Palestinians don't have a right to self defence...
Except I have never justified attacking all Palestinians because some Palestinians are terrorists. I only support stopping or arresting the actual terrorists. The problem is your definition of what constitutes terrorism is different for Jews and Arabs. You have described settlers throwing stones at Palestinian civilians as terrorism (and I agree with you) but when Palestinians throw stones at Jewish civilians you claim it is "self defence".I did use exactly this question to you, as you justify the killing of Palestinians based on your claims that they might be terrorists.
It was used in order to highlight your own hypocrisy, for your refusal to apply the same standard to all races.
Under Canadian law, you have absolutely zero right of self defence against a burglar for simply being in your house just like the Palestinians have absolutely zero right to attack Jews for being in the West Bank. The only exception would be if you are "under a reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the person assaulted".If you come home and find someone robbing your house, do they have a right to self defence against your attack?
Actually the UN says that the status of the land can only be settled by negotiations in for two states.You've got two sides claiming the same land, true.
But one side also has numerous UN resolutions backing that claim,...
Yes, any peace deal means that non-state militias like Hamas must be disarmed before the PA can implement any peace deal.I see, so your model of peace talks is capitulation and surrender, then talks.
And until then apartheid.
That would make you possibly worse then Hamas.
Bullshit.Except I have never justified attacking all Palestinians because some Palestinians are terrorists. .
Desperate crap from you as usual especially since you openly back attacks on Jews in the west bank.Bullshit.
You justified the attacks on Gaza because you say Hamas are terrorists, but that was an attack on all Palestinians in Gaza.
You justify the blockade, because of 'terrorists'.
You justify the shooting of protesters because of 'terrorists'.
The reports say that settlers are way more violent the Palestinians in the West Bank.Desperate crap from you as usual especially since you openly back attacks on Jews in the west bank.
Keep making things up. There are hundreds of attacks by Palestinians on Jewish civilians every month but you refuse to listen because they are reported on bynisareli sources.The reports say that settlers are way more violent the Palestinians in the West Bank.
You are supporting the cause of the violence, the illegal occupation.
You are the one making things up.Keep making things up. There are hundreds of attacks by Palestinians on Jewish civilians every month but you refuse to listen because they are reported on bynisareli sources.
I'll take it by this that you admit that the stats show you are backing the majority cause of the violence.Blah blah blah.
https://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=779814BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) -- Israeli settlers reportedly assaulted Palestinians and journalists during a sit-in protest in solidarity with child prisoners in the southern occupied West Bank city of Hebron, according to official Palestinian Authority (PA)-owned Wafa news agency.
Wafa reported that under the protection of Israeli forces, dozens of Israeli settlers from nearby settlement physically and verbally assaulted residents, journalists and children during the sit-in.
Between 500,000 and 600,000 Israelis live in Jewish-only settlements across occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank in violation of international law.
The Palestinian government has no jurisdiction over Israelis in the West Bank, and acts carried out by Israeli settlers often occur in the presence of Israeli military forces who rarely act to protect Palestinian residents.
The majority of settler attacks committed against Palestinians are met with impunity, with Israelis rarely facing consequences for such thefts.
Only 1.9 percent of complaints submitted by Palestinians against Israeli settler attacks or theft result in a conviction.
Yesh Din, along with Israeli rights group B’Tselem, have previously condemned Israeli authorities for failing to protect Palestinians from settlers violence or investigate attacks.